git-troubleshooting

geoffjay/claude-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/geoffjay/claude-plugins --skill git-troubleshooting
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

This skill provides comprehensive guidance on diagnosing and resolving git issues, recovering from mistakes, fixing corrupted repositories, and handling common error scenarios.

skill.md

Git Troubleshooting Skill

This skill provides comprehensive guidance on diagnosing and resolving git issues, recovering from mistakes, fixing corrupted repositories, and handling common error scenarios.

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  • Encountering git error messages
  • Recovering lost commits or branches
  • Fixing corrupted repositories
  • Resolving detached HEAD state
  • Handling botched merges or rebases
  • Diagnosing repository issues
  • Recovering from force push
  • Fixing authentication problems

Recovering Lost Commits

Using Reflog

# View reflog (local history of HEAD)
git reflog

# View reflog for specific branch
git reflog show branch-name

# Output example:
# abc123 HEAD@{0}: commit: feat: add authentication
# def456 HEAD@{1}: commit: fix: resolve bug
# ghi789 HEAD@{2}: reset: moving to HEAD~1

# Recover lost commit
git cherry-pick abc123

# Or create branch from lost commit
git branch recovered-branch abc123

# Or reset to lost commit
git reset --hard abc123

Finding Dangling Commits

# Find all unreachable objects
git fsck --lost-found

# Output:
# dangling commit abc123
# dangling blob def456

# View dangling commit
git show abc123

# Recover dangling commit
git branch recovered abc123

# Or merge it
git merge abc123

Recovering Deleted Branch

# Find branch commit in reflog
git reflog

# Look for branch deletion:
# abc123 HEAD@{5}: checkout: moving from feature-branch to main

# Recreate branch
git branch feature-branch abc123

# Or if branch was merged before deletion
git log --all --oneline | grep "feature"
git branch feature-branch def456

Recovering After Reset

# After accidental reset --hard
git reflog

# Find commit before reset:
# abc123 HEAD@{0}: reset: moving to HEAD~5
# def456 HEAD@{1}: commit: last good commit

# Restore to previous state
git reset --hard def456

# Or create recovery branch
git branch recovery def456

Resolving Detached HEAD

Understanding Detached HEAD

# Detached HEAD state occurs when:
git checkout abc123
git checkout v1.0.0
git checkout origin/main

# HEAD is not attached to any branch

Recovering from Detached HEAD

# Check current state
git status
# HEAD detached at abc123

# Option 1: Create new branch
git checkout -b new-branch-name

# Option 2: Return to previous branch
git checkout main

# Option 3: Reattach HEAD to branch
git checkout -b temp-branch
git checkout main
git merge temp-branch

# If you made commits in detached HEAD:
git reflog
# Find the commits
git branch recovery-branch abc123

Preventing Detached HEAD

# Instead of checking out tag directly
git checkout -b release-v1.0 v1.0.0

# Instead of checking out remote branch
git checkout -b local-feature origin/feature-branch

# Check if HEAD is detached
git symbolic-ref -q HEAD && echo "attached" || echo "detached"

Fixing Merge Conflicts

Understanding Conflict Markers

<<<<<<< HEAD (Current Change)
int result = add(a, b);
||||||| merged common ancestors (Base)
int result = sum(a, b);
=======
int sum = calculate(a, b);
>>>>>>> feature-branch (Incoming Change)

Basic Conflict Resolution

# When merge conflict occurs
git status
# both modified: file.go

# View conflict
cat file.go

# Option 1: Keep ours (current branch)
git checkout --ours file.go
git add file.go

# Option 2: Keep theirs (incoming branch)
git checkout --theirs file.go
git add file.go

# Option 3: Manual resolution
# Edit file.go to resolve conflicts
git add file.go

# Complete merge
git commit

Aborting Operations

# Abort merge
git merge --abort

# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort

# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort

# Abort revert
git revert --abort

# Abort am (apply mailbox)
git am --abort

Complex Conflict Resolution

# Use merge tool
git mergetool

# View three-way diff
git diff --ours
git diff --theirs
git diff --base

# Show conflicts with context
git diff --check

# List conflicted files
git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U

# After resolving all conflicts
git add .
git commit

Fixing Botched Rebase

Recovering from Failed Rebase

# Abort current rebase
git rebase --abort

# Find state before rebase
git reflog
# abc123 HEAD@{1}: rebase: checkout main

# Return to pre-rebase state
git reset --hard HEAD@{1}

# Alternative: use ORIG_HEAD
git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD

Rebase Conflicts

# During rebase conflict
git status
# both modified: file.go

# Resolve conflicts
# Edit file.go
git add file.go
git rebase --continue

# Skip problematic commit
git rebase --skip

# Edit commit during rebase
git commit --amend
git rebase --continue

Rebase onto Wrong Branch

# Find original branch point
git reflog

# Reset to before rebase
git reset --hard HEAD@{5}

# Rebase onto correct branch
git rebase correct-branch

Repository Corruption

Detecting Corruption

# Check repository integrity
git fsck --full

# Check connectivity
git fsck --connectivity-only

# Verify pack files
git verify-pack -v .git/objects/pack/*.idx

Fixing Corrupted Objects

# Remove corrupted object
rm .git/objects/ab/cd1234...

# Try to recover from remote
git fetch origin

# Rebuild object database
git gc --prune=now

# Aggressive cleanup
git gc --aggressive --prune=now

Fixing Index Corruption

# Remove corrupted index
rm .git/index

# Rebuild index
git reset

# Or reset to HEAD
git reset --hard HEAD

Recovering from Bad Pack File

# Unpack corrupted pack
git unpack-objects < .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack

# Remove corrupted pack
rm .git/objects/pack/pack-*

# Repack repository
git repack -a -d

# Verify integrity
git fsck --full

Fixing References

Corrupted Branch References

# View all references
git show-ref

# Manual reference fix
echo "abc123def456" > .git/refs/heads/branch-name

# Or use update-ref
git update-ref refs/heads/branch-name abc123

# Delete corrupted reference
how to use git-troubleshooting

How to use git-troubleshooting on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add git-troubleshooting
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/geoffjay/claude-plugins --skill git-troubleshooting

The skills CLI fetches git-troubleshooting from GitHub repository geoffjay/claude-plugins and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/git-troubleshooting

Reload or restart Cursor to activate git-troubleshooting. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /git-troubleshooting) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.561 reviews
  • Harper Gill· Dec 28, 2024

    git-troubleshooting reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Alexander Nasser· Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: git-troubleshooting is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Ava Rahman· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for git-troubleshooting matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ava Choi· Dec 24, 2024

    git-troubleshooting fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Mei Kim· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in git-troubleshooting — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Luis Khanna· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend git-troubleshooting for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Sophia Srinivasan· Nov 27, 2024

    git-troubleshooting fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in git-troubleshooting — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Naina Menon· Nov 19, 2024

    We added git-troubleshooting from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Mei Huang· Nov 19, 2024

    git-troubleshooting has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 61

1 / 7