openspec-implementation

forztf/open-skilled-sdd · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/forztf/open-skilled-sdd --skill openspec-implementation
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Systematically implements approved spec proposals by executing tasks sequentially with proper testing and validation.

skill.md

Specification Implementation

Systematically implements approved spec proposals by executing tasks sequentially with proper testing and validation.

Quick Start

Implementation follows a read → execute → test → validate cycle for each task:

  1. Read the full proposal and task list
  2. Execute tasks one at a time, in order
  3. Test each completed task
  4. Mark complete only after verification

Critical rule: Use TodoWrite to track progress. Never skip tasks or mark incomplete work as done.

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track progress:

Implementation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Load and understand the proposal
- [ ] Step 2: Set up TodoWrite task tracking
- [ ] Step 3: Execute tasks sequentially
- [ ] Step 4: Test and validate each task
- [ ] Step 5: Update living specifications (if applicable)
- [ ] Step 6: Mark proposal as implementation-complete

Step 1: Load and understand the proposal

Before starting, read all context:

# Read the proposal
cat spec/changes/{change-id}/proposal.md

# Read all tasks
cat spec/changes/{change-id}/tasks.md

# Read spec deltas to understand requirements
find spec/changes/{change-id}/specs -name "*.md" -exec cat {} \;

Understand:

  • Why this change is needed (from proposal.md)
  • What the expected outcomes are
  • Which specs will be affected
  • What the acceptance criteria are (from scenarios)

Step 2: Set up TodoWrite task tracking

Load tasks from tasks.md into TodoWrite before starting work:

**Pattern**:
Read tasks.md → Extract numbered list → Create TodoWrite entries

**Example**:
If tasks.md contains:
1. Create database migration
2. Implement API endpoint
3. Add tests
4. Update documentation

Then create TodoWrite with:
- content: "Create database migration", status: "in_progress"
- content: "Implement API endpoint", status: "pending"
- content: "Add tests", status: "pending"
- content: "Update documentation", status: "pending"

Why this matters: TodoWrite gives the user visibility into progress and ensures nothing gets skipped.

Step 3: Execute tasks sequentially

Work through tasks one at a time, in order:

For each task:
1. Mark as "in_progress" in TodoWrite
2. Execute the work
3. Test the work
4. Only mark "completed" after verification

NEVER skip ahead or batch multiple tasks before testing.

Task execution pattern:

## Task: {Task Description}

**What**: [Brief explanation of what this task does]

**Implementation**:
[Code changes, file edits, commands run]

**Verification**:
[How to verify this task is complete]
- [ ] Code compiles/runs
- [ ] Tests pass
- [ ] Meets requirement scenarios

**Status**: ✓ Complete / ✗ Blocked / ⚠ Partial

Step 4: Test and validate each task

After each task, verify it works:

For code tasks:

# Run relevant tests
npm test # or pytest, cargo test, etc.

# Run linter
npm run lint

# Check types (if applicable)
npm run type-check

For database tasks:

# Verify migration runs
npm run db:migrate

# Check schema matches expected
npm run db:schema

For API tasks:

# Test endpoint manually
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/endpoint \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"test": "data"}'

# Or run integration tests
npm run test:integration

Only mark task complete after all verifications pass.

Step 5: Update living specifications (if applicable)

During implementation, if you discover the spec deltas need updates:

  1. Document the discovery in proposal.md or a notes file
  2. Do NOT modify spec deltas during implementation
  3. After implementation completes, consider whether spec needs adjustment

Note: Spec deltas are merged during archiving (Step 6), not during implementation.

Step 6: Mark proposal as implementation-complete

After all tasks are complete:

# Create a completion marker
echo "Implementation completed: $(date)" > spec/changes/{change-id}/IMPLEMENTED

Tell the user:

## Implementation Complete

**Change**: {change-id}
**Tasks completed**: {count}
**Tests**: All passing

**Next step**: Archive this change to merge spec deltas into living documentation.
Say "openspec archive {change-id}" or "archive this change" when ready.

Best Practices

Pattern 1: Blocked Tasks

If a task cannot be completed:

**Mark as blocked**:
- Keep status as "in_progress" (NOT "completed")
- Document the blocker clearly
- Create a new task for resolving the blocker
- Inform the user immediately

**Example**:
Task: "Implement payment processing"
Blocker: "Missing API credentials for payment gateway"
Action: Create new task "Obtain payment gateway credentials"

Pattern 2: Task Dependencies

If tasks have dependencies, verify prerequisites before starting:

# Example: Database migration must run before API code
# Check migration status
npm run db:status

# Only proceed with API task if migration succeeded

Pattern 3: Incremental Testing

Test incrementally, not at the end:

Good:

Task 1: Create model → Test model → Mark complete
Task 2: Create API → Test API → Mark complete
Task 3: Add validation → Test validation → Mark complete

Bad:

Task 1, 2, 3 → Implement all → Test everything → Debug failures

Pattern 4: Living Documentation

Keep README, API docs, and comments up to date as you go:

When adding a new API endpoint, also:
- Update API documentation
- Add example request/response
- Update OpenAPI/Swagger spec
- Add inline code comments

Advanced Topics

Parallel work: If tasks are truly independent (e.g., separate modules), you can work on them in parallel, but each must be tested independently.

Integration points: When task dependencies exist, use integration tests to verify the connection works.

Rollback strategy: For risky changes, create rollback tasks before deploying.

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Database + API + UI

Typical order:

  1. Database schema/migration
  2. Data access layer (models)
  3. Business logic layer (services)
  4. API endpoints (controllers)
  5. UI integration
  6. End-to-end tests

Pattern 2: Feature Flags

For gradual rollouts:

  1. Implement feature behind flag
  2. Test with flag enabled
  3. Deploy with flag disabled
  4. Enable flag incrementally
  5. Remove flag after full rollout

Pattern 3: Breaking Changes

For API breaking changes:

  1. Implement new version (v2)
  2. Keep old version (v1) working
  3. Add deprecation warnings to v1
  4. Migrate users to v2
  5. Remove v1 (separate task/proposal)

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Don't:

  • Skip testing individual tasks
  • Mark tasks complete before verification
  • Ignore failing tests ("I'll fix it later")
  • Batch multiple tasks before testing
  • Modify living specs during implementation
  • Work out of order (dependencies break)

Do:

  • Test each task immediately
  • Fix failing tests before proceeding
  • Update TodoWrite in real-time
  • Document blockers clearly
  • Communicate progress to user
  • Keep commits atomic and descriptive

Troubleshooting

Issue: Tests failing after task completion

Solution:

1. Do NOT mark task complete
2. Debug the failure
3. Fix the code
4. Re-run tests
5. Only mark complete after pass

Issue: Task is too large

Solution:

1. Break into subtasks
2. Update TodoWrite with subtasks
3. Complete subtasks sequentially
4. Mark parent task complete after all subtasks done

Issue: Dependency not met

Solution:

1. Pause current task
2. Complete dependency first
3. Test dependency
4. Resume original task

Reference Materials


Token budget: This SKILL.md is approximately 430 lines, under the 500-line recommended limit.

how to use openspec-implementation

How to use openspec-implementation on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add openspec-implementation
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/forztf/open-skilled-sdd --skill openspec-implementation

The skills CLI fetches openspec-implementation from GitHub repository forztf/open-skilled-sdd and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/openspec-implementation

Reload or restart Cursor to activate openspec-implementation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /openspec-implementation) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.674 reviews
  • Fatima Agarwal· Dec 24, 2024

    openspec-implementation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Luis Chen· Dec 16, 2024

    openspec-implementation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Anika Verma· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for openspec-implementation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in openspec-implementation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: openspec-implementation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Michael Shah· Dec 4, 2024

    We added openspec-implementation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 27, 2024

    openspec-implementation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Zaid Mensah· Nov 23, 2024

    openspec-implementation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sakura Sethi· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for openspec-implementation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Kofi Martin· Nov 7, 2024

    Registry listing for openspec-implementation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 74

1 / 8