openspec-archiving

forztf/open-skilled-sdd · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/forztf/open-skilled-sdd --skill openspec-archiving
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Archives completed change proposals and merges their spec deltas into the living specification documentation.

skill.md

Specification Archiving

Archives completed change proposals and merges their spec deltas into the living specification documentation.

Quick Start

Archiving involves two main operations:

  1. Move change folder to archive with timestamp
  2. Merge spec deltas into living specs (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED operations)

Critical rule: Verify all tasks are complete before archiving. Archiving signifies deployment and completion.

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track progress:

Archive Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Verify implementation is complete
- [ ] Step 2: Review spec deltas to merge
- [ ] Step 3: Create timestamped archive directory
- [ ] Step 4: Merge ADDED requirements into living specs
- [ ] Step 5: Merge MODIFIED requirements into living specs
- [ ] Step 6: Merge REMOVED requirements into living specs
- [ ] Step 7: Move change folder to archive
- [ ] Step 8: Validate living spec structure

Step 1: Verify implementation is complete

Before archiving, confirm all work is done:

# Check for IMPLEMENTED marker
test -f spec/changes/{change-id}/IMPLEMENTED && echo "✓ Implemented" || echo "✗ Not implemented"

# Review tasks
cat spec/changes/{change-id}/tasks.md

# Check git status for uncommitted work
git status

Ask the user:

Are all tasks complete and tested?
Has this change been deployed to production?
Should I proceed with archiving?

Step 2: Review spec deltas to merge

Understand what will be merged:

# List all spec delta files
find spec/changes/{change-id}/specs -name "*.md" -type f

# Read each delta
for file in spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/**/*.md; do
    echo "=== $file ==="
    cat "$file"
done

Identify:

  • Which capabilities are affected
  • How many requirements are ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED
  • Where in living specs these changes belong

Step 3: Create timestamped archive directory

# Create archive with today's date
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
mkdir -p spec/archive/${TIMESTAMP}-{change-id}

Example:

# For change "add-user-auth" archived on Oct 26, 2025
mkdir -p spec/archive/2025-10-26-add-user-auth

Step 4: Merge ADDED requirements into living specs

For each ## ADDED Requirements section:

Process:

  1. Locate the target living spec file
  2. Append the new requirements to the end of the file
  3. Maintain proper markdown formatting

Example:

Source (spec/changes/add-user-auth/specs/authentication/spec-delta.md):

## ADDED Requirements

### Requirement: User Login
WHEN a user submits valid credentials,
the system SHALL authenticate the user and create a session.

#### Scenario: Successful Login
GIVEN valid credentials
WHEN user submits login form
THEN system creates session

Target (spec/specs/authentication/spec.md):

# Append to living spec
cat >> spec/specs/authentication/spec.md << 'EOF'

### Requirement: User Login
WHEN a user submits valid credentials,
the system SHALL authenticate the user and create a session.

#### Scenario: Successful Login
GIVEN valid credentials
WHEN user submits login form
THEN system creates session
EOF

Step 5: Merge MODIFIED requirements into living specs

For each ## MODIFIED Requirements section:

Process:

  1. Locate the existing requirement in the living spec
  2. Replace the ENTIRE requirement block (including all scenarios)
  3. Use the complete updated text from the delta

Example using sed:

# Find and replace requirement block
# This is conceptual - actual implementation depends on structure

# First, identify the line range of the old requirement
START_LINE=$(grep -n "### Requirement: User Login" spec/specs/authentication/spec.md | cut -d: -f1)

# Find the end (next requirement or end of file)
END_LINE=$(tail -n +$((START_LINE + 1)) spec/specs/authentication/spec.md | \
           grep -n "^### Requirement:" | head -1 | cut -d: -f1)

# Delete old requirement
sed -i "${START_LINE},${END_LINE}d" spec/specs/authentication/spec.md

# Insert new requirement at same position
# (Extract from delta and insert)

Manual approach (recommended for safety):

1. Open living spec in editor
2. Find the requirement by name
3. Delete entire block (requirement + all scenarios)
4. Paste updated requirement from delta
5. Save

Step 6: Merge REMOVED requirements into living specs

For each ## REMOVED Requirements section:

Process:

  1. Locate the requirement in the living spec
  2. Delete the entire requirement block
  3. Add a comment documenting the removal

Example:

# Option 1: Delete with comment
# Manually edit spec/specs/authentication/spec.md

# Add deprecation comment
echo "<!-- Requirement 'Legacy Password Reset' removed $(date +%Y-%m-%d) -->" >> spec/specs/authentication/spec.md

# Delete the requirement block manually or with sed

Pattern:

<!-- Removed 2025-10-26: User must use email-based password reset -->
~~### Requirement: SMS Password Reset~~

Step 7: Move change folder to archive

After all deltas are merged:

# Move entire change folder to archive
mv spec/changes/{change-id} spec/archive/${TIMESTAMP}-{change-id}

Verify move succeeded:

# Check archive exists
ls -la spec/archive/${TIMESTAMP}-{change-id}

# Check changes directory is clean
ls spec/changes/ | grep "{change-id}"  # Should return nothing

Step 8: Validate living spec structure

After merging, validate the living specs are well-formed:

# Check requirement format
grep -n "### Requirement:" spec/specs/**/*.md

# Check scenario format
grep -n "#### Scenario:" spec/specs/**/*.md

# Count requirements per spec
for spec in spec/specs/**/spec.md; do
    count=$(grep -c "### Requirement:" "$spec")
    echo "$spec: $count requirements"
done

Manual review:

  • Open each modified spec file
  • Verify markdown formatting is correct
  • Check requirements flow logically
  • Ensure no duplicate requirements exist

Merge Logic Reference

ADDED Operation

Action: Append to living spec
Location: End of file (before any footer/appendix)
Format: Copy requirement + all scenarios exactly as written

MODIFIED Operation

Action: Replace existing requirement
Location: Find by requirement name, replace entire block
Format: Use complete updated text from delta (don't merge, replace)
Note: Old version is preserved in archive

REMOVED Operation

Action: Delete requirement, add deprecation comment
Location: Find by requirement name
Format: Delete entire block, optionally add <!-- Removed YYYY-MM-DD: reason -->

RENAMED Operation (uncommon)

Action: Update requirement name, keep content
Location: Find by old name, update to new name
Format: Just change the header: ### Requirement: NewName
Note: Typically use MODIFIED instead

Best Practices

Pattern 1: Verify Before Moving

Always verify delta merges before moving to archive:

# After merging, check diff
git diff spec/specs/

# Review changes
git diff spec/specs/authentication/spec.md

# If correct, commit
git add spec/specs/
git commit -m "Merge spec deltas from add-user-auth"

# Then archive
mv spec/changes/add-user-auth spec/archive/2025-10-26-add-user-auth

Pattern 2: Atomic Archiving

Archive entire changes, not individual files:

Good:

# Move complete change folder
mv spec/changes/add-user-auth spec/archive/2025-10-26-add-user-auth

Bad:

# Don't cherry-pick files
mv spec/changes/add-user-auth/proposal.md spec/archive/
# (leaves orphaned files)

Pattern 3: Archive Preservation

The archive is a historical record. Never modify archived files:

❌ Don't: Edit files in spec/archive/
✓ Do: Treat archive as read-only history

Pattern 4: Git Commit Strategy

Recommended commit workflow:

# Commit 1: Merge deltas
git add spec/specs/
git commit -m "Merge spec deltas from add-user-auth

- Added User Login requirement
- Modified Password Policy requirement
- Removed Legacy Auth requirement"

# Commit 2: Archive change
git add spec/archive/ spec/changes/
git commit -m "Archive add-user-auth change"

Advanced Topics

For complex deltas: See reference/MERGE_LOGIC.md

Conflict resolution: If multiple changes modif

how to use openspec-archiving

How to use openspec-archiving on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add openspec-archiving
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/forztf/open-skilled-sdd --skill openspec-archiving

The skills CLI fetches openspec-archiving from GitHub repository forztf/open-skilled-sdd and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/openspec-archiving

Reload or restart Cursor to activate openspec-archiving. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /openspec-archiving) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.762 reviews
  • Li Reddy· Dec 28, 2024

    openspec-archiving is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Anaya Mehta· Dec 28, 2024

    We added openspec-archiving from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in openspec-archiving — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Anaya Menon· Dec 16, 2024

    openspec-archiving has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024

    openspec-archiving fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Aditi Martinez· Dec 12, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: openspec-archiving is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Kwame Verma· Nov 19, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: openspec-archiving is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Anaya Ghosh· Nov 19, 2024

    openspec-archiving reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kwame Smith· Nov 7, 2024

    Keeps context tight: openspec-archiving is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 3, 2024

    Registry listing for openspec-archiving matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 62

1 / 7