spec-kit-skill▌
feiskyer/claude-code-settings · updated May 22, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Official GitHub Spec-Kit integration providing a 7-phase constitution-driven workflow for feature development.
Spec-Kit: Constitution-Based Spec-Driven Development
Official GitHub Spec-Kit integration providing a 7-phase constitution-driven workflow for feature development.
Quick Start
This skill works with the GitHub Spec-Kit CLI to guide you through structured feature development:
- Constitution → Establish governing principles
- Specify → Define functional requirements
- Clarify → Resolve ambiguities
- Plan → Create technical strategy
- Tasks → Generate actionable breakdown
- Analyze → Validate consistency
- Implement → Execute implementation
Storage: Creates files in .specify/specs/NNN-feature-name/ directory with numbered features
When to Use
- Setting up spec-kit in a project
- Creating constitution-based feature specifications
- Working with .specify/ directory
- Following GitHub spec-kit workflow
- Constitution-driven development
Prerequisites & Setup
Check CLI Installation
First, verify if spec-kit CLI is installed:
command -v specify || echo "Not installed"
Installation
If not installed:
# Persistent installation (recommended)
uv tool install specify-cli --from git+https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git
# One-time usage
uvx --from git+https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git specify init <PROJECT_NAME>
Requirements:
- Python 3.11+
- Git
- uv package manager (install uv)
Project Initialization
If CLI is installed but project not initialized:
# Initialize in current directory
specify init . --ai claude
# Initialize new project
specify init <project-name> --ai claude
# Options:
# --force: Overwrite non-empty directories
# --script ps: Generate PowerShell scripts (Windows)
# --no-git: Skip Git initialization
Detecting Project State
Before proceeding, always detect the current state:
1. CLI Installed?
if command -v specify &> /dev/null || [ -x "$HOME/.local/bin/specify" ]; then
echo "CLI installed"
else
echo "CLI not installed - guide user through installation"
fi
2. Project Initialized?
if [ -d ".specify" ] && [ -f ".specify/memory/constitution.md" ]; then
echo "Project initialized"
else
echo "Project not initialized - guide user through 'specify init'"
fi
3. Current Feature
# Get latest feature directory
LATEST=$(ls -d .specify/specs/[0-9]* 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)
echo "Latest feature: $LATEST"
4. Current Phase
Detect phase by checking file existence in latest feature:
FEATURE_DIR=".specify/specs/001-feature-name"
if [ ! -f ".specify/memory/constitution.md" ]; then
echo "Phase: constitution"
elif [ ! -d "$FEATURE_DIR" ]; then
echo "Phase: specify"
elif [ -f "$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md" ] && ! grep -q "## Clarifications" "$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md"; then
echo "Phase: clarify"
elif [ ! -f "$FEATURE_DIR/plan.md" ]; then
echo "Phase: plan"
elif [ ! -f "$FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md" ]; then
echo "Phase: tasks"
elif [ -f "$FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md" ] && grep -q "\\- \\[ \\]" "$FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md"; then
echo "Phase: implement"
else
echo "Phase: complete"
fi
Constitution Phase
Establish foundational principles that govern all development decisions.
Purpose
Create .specify/memory/constitution.md with:
- Project values and principles
- Technical standards
- Decision-making frameworks
- Code quality expectations
- Architecture guidelines
Process
-
Gather Context
- Understand project domain
- Identify key stakeholders
- Review existing standards (if any)
-
Draft Constitution
- Core values and principles
- Technical standards
- Quality expectations
- Decision criteria
-
Structure
# Project Constitution
## Core Values
1. **[Value Name]**: [Description and implications]
2. **[Value Name]**: [Description and implications]
## Technical Principles
### Architecture
- [Principle with rationale]
### Code Quality
- [Standards and expectations]
### Performance
- [Performance criteria]
## Decision Framework
When making technical decisions, consider:
1. [Criterion with priority]
2. [Criterion with priority]
- Versioning
- Constitution can evolve
- Track changes for governance
- Review periodically
Example Content
# Project Constitution
## Core Values
1. **Simplicity Over Cleverness**: Favor straightforward solutions that are easy to understand and maintain over clever optimizations.
2. **User Experience First**: Every technical decision should improve or maintain user experience.
## Technical Principles
### Architecture
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- Keep components loosely coupled
- Design for testability
### Code Quality
- Code reviews required for all changes
- Unit test coverage > 80%
- Documentation for public APIs
### Performance
- Page load < 3 seconds
- API response < 200ms
- Progressive enhancement for slower connections
## Decision Framework
When choosing between approaches:
1. Does it align with our core values?
2. Is it maintainable by the team?
3. Does it scale with our growth?
4. What's the long-term cost?
Specify Phase
Define what needs building and why, avoiding technology specifics.
Script Usage
# Create new feature
.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "feature-name"
# Expected JSON output:
# {"BRANCH_NAME": "001-feature-name", "SPEC_FILE": "/path/to/.specify/specs/001-feature-name/spec.md"}
Parse JSON: Extract BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE for subsequent operations.
Template Structure
Load .specify/templates/spec-template.md to understand required sections, then create specification at SPEC_FILE location.
Specification Content
Focus on functional requirements:
# Feature Specification: [Feature Name]
## Problem Statement
[What problem are we solving?]
## User Stories
### Story 1: [Title]
As a [role]
I want [capability]
So that [benefit]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion]
### Story 2: [Title]
[Continue...]
## Non-Functional Requirements
- Performance: [Specific metrics]
- Security: [Requirements]
- Accessibility: [Standards]
- Scalability: [Expectations]
## Success Metrics
- [Measurable outcome]
- [Measurable outcome]
## Out of Scope
[Explicitly state what's NOT included]
Key Principles
- Technology-agnostic: Don't specify "use React" or "MySQL"
- Outcome-focused: Describe what user achieves, not how
- Testable: Acceptance criteria must be verifiable
- Complete: Address edge cases and error scenarios
Git Integration
The script automatically:
- Creates new feature branch (e.g.,
001-feature-name) - Checks out the branch
- Initializes spec file
Clarify Phase
Resolve underspecified areas through targeted questioning.
Purpose
Before pla
How to use spec-kit-skill on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add spec-kit-skill
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches spec-kit-skill from GitHub repository feiskyer/claude-code-settings and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate spec-kit-skill. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /spec-kit-skill) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★61 reviews- ★★★★★Sophia Martinez· Dec 28, 2024
spec-kit-skill fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Aisha Khanna· Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: spec-kit-skill is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Yuki Torres· Dec 20, 2024
spec-kit-skill has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sophia Robinson· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: spec-kit-skill is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Layla Desai· Dec 8, 2024
spec-kit-skill is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024
spec-kit-skill has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Arjun Liu· Nov 27, 2024
spec-kit-skill reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: spec-kit-skill is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Zaid Robinson· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for spec-kit-skill matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sophia Torres· Nov 11, 2024
We added spec-kit-skill from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 61