swift-testing

dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill swift-testing
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Modern Swift testing framework with @Test macros, parameterized tests, traits, and async support.

  • Write unit tests using @Test macros with #expect and #require assertions; prefer Swift Testing over XCTest for all new tests (Xcode 16+, Swift 6+)
  • Organize tests with @Suite for grouping, custom tags for filtering, and traits for conditional execution, time limits, and known issues
  • Support parameterized tests via arguments: with enum cases, ranges, or cartesian products; use confirmation
skill.md

Swift Testing

Swift Testing is the modern testing framework for Swift (Xcode 16+, Swift 6+). Prefer it over XCTest for all new unit tests. Use XCTest only for UI tests, performance benchmarks, and snapshot tests.

Contents


Basic Tests

import Testing

@Test("User can update their display name")
func updateDisplayName() {
    var user = User(name: "Alice")
    user.name = "Bob"
    #expect(user.name == "Bob")
}

@Test Traits

@Test("Validates email format")                                    // display name
@Test(.tags(.validation, .email))                                  // tags
@Test(.disabled("Server migration in progress"))                   // disabled
@Test(.enabled(if: ProcessInfo.processInfo.environment["CI"] != nil)) // conditional
@Test(.bug("https://github.com/org/repo/issues/42"))               // bug reference
@Test(.timeLimit(.minutes(1)))                                     // time limit
@Test("Timeout handling", .tags(.networking), .timeLimit(.seconds(30))) // combined

#expect and #require

// #expect records failure but continues execution
#expect(result == 42)
#expect(name.isEmpty == false)
#expect(items.count > 0, "Items should not be empty")

// #expect with error type checking
#expect(throws: ValidationError.self) {
    try validate(email: "not-an-email")
}

// #expect with specific error value
#expect {
    try validate(email: "")
} throws: { error in
    guard let err = error as? ValidationError else { return false }
    return err == .empty
}

// #require records failure AND stops test (like XCTUnwrap)
let user = try #require(await fetchUser(id: 1))
#expect(user.name == "Alice")

// #require for optionals -- unwraps or fails
let first = try #require(items.first)
#expect(first.isValid)

Rule: Use #require when subsequent assertions depend on the value. Use #expect for independent checks.

@Suite and Test Organization

See references/testing-patterns.md for suite organization, confirmation patterns, and known-issue handling.

Known Issues

Mark expected failures so they do not cause test failure:

withKnownIssue("Propane tank is empty") {
    #expect(truck.grill.isHeating)
}

// Intermittent / flaky failures
withKnownIssue(isIntermittent: true) {
    #expect(service.isReachable)
}

// Conditional known issue
withKnownIssue {
    #expect(foodTruck.grill.isHeating)
} when: {
    !hasPropane
}

If no known issues are recorded, Swift Testing records a distinct issue notifying you the problem may be resolved.

Additional Patterns

See references/testing-patterns.md for complete examples of:

  • TestScoping -- custom test lifecycle with setup/teardown consolidation
  • Mocking and Test Doubles -- protocol-based doubles and testable architecture
  • View Model Testing -- environment injection and dependency isolation
  • Async Patterns -- clock injection and error path testing
  • XCUITest -- page objects, performance testing, snapshot testing, and test file organization

Parameterized Tests In Depth

@Test with Arguments

Pass any Sendable & Collection to arguments:. Each element runs as an independent test case.

// Enum-based: runs one case per enum value
enum Environment: String, CaseIterable, Sendable {
    case development, staging, production
}

@Test("Base URL is valid for all environments", arguments: Environment.allCases)
func baseURLIsValid(env: Environment) throws {
    let url = try #require(URL(string: Config.baseURL(for: env)))
    #expect(url.scheme == "https")
}

Ranges as Arguments

@Test("Fibonacci is positive for small inputs", arguments: 1...20)
func fibonacciPositive(n: Int) {
    #expect(fibonacci(n) > 0)
}

Multiple Parameter Sources

Two argument collections produce a cartesian product (every combination):

@Test(arguments: ["light", "dark"], ["iPhone", "iPad"])
func snapshotTest(colorScheme: String, device: String) {
    // Runs 4 combinations: light+iPhone, light+iPad, dark+iPhone, dark+iPad
    let config = SnapshotConfig(colorScheme: colorScheme, device: device)
    #expect(config
how to use swift-testing

How to use swift-testing on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add swift-testing
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill swift-testing

The skills CLI fetches swift-testing from GitHub repository dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/swift-testing

Reload or restart Cursor to activate swift-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /swift-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.661 reviews
  • Harper Gupta· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for swift-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ira Thomas· Dec 20, 2024

    swift-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Li Abbas· Dec 20, 2024

    swift-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Neel Sethi· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend swift-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024

    We added swift-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 27, 2024

    swift-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Aditi Perez· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: swift-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Daniel Lopez· Nov 11, 2024

    We added swift-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Li Choi· Nov 11, 2024

    We added swift-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Daniel Gonzalez· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in swift-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 61

1 / 7