Use dex directly for all commands:
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiondex-planExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches dex-plan from dcramer/dex and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate dex-plan. Access via /dex-plan in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
226
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
226
stars
Use dex directly for all commands:
dex <command>
If dex is not on PATH, use npx @zeeg/dex <command> instead. Check once at the start:
command -v dex &>/dev/null && echo "use: dex" || echo "use: npx @zeeg/dex"
Use /dex-plan to convert any markdown planning document into a trackable dex task.
Any markdown file containing planning or design content:
~/.claude/plans/*.md)SPEC.md, REQUIREMENTS.md)DESIGN.md, ARCHITECTURE.md)ROADMAP.md)/dex-plan <markdown-file-path>
From plan mode:
/dex-plan /home/user/.claude/plans/moonlit-brewing-lynx.md
From specification document:
/dex-plan @SPEC.md
From design document:
/dex-plan docs/AUTHENTICATION_DESIGN.md
From roadmap:
/dex-plan ROADMAP.md
# heading (or uses filename as fallback)From plan mode file:
# Plan: Add JWT Authentication
## Summary
...
→ Task description: "Add JWT Authentication" (note: "Plan: " prefix stripped)
From specification document:
# User Authentication Specification
## Requirements
...
→ Task description: "User Authentication Specification"
After creating the main task, the skill analyzes the plan structure to determine if breaking it into subtasks adds value.
The skill supports up to 3 levels (maximum depth enforced by dex):
| Level | Name | Example |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Epic | "Add user authentication system" |
| L1 | Task | "Implement JWT middleware" |
| L2 | Subtask | "Add token verification function" |
The skill creates subtasks when the plan has:
Epic-level breakdown (creates tasks, not subtasks) when:
The skill keeps a single task when:
When breakdown occurs, each subtask includes:
--parentInput plan (auth-plan.md):
# Plan: Add Authentication System
## Implementation
1. Create database schema for users/tokens
2. Implement auth controller with endpoints
3. Add JWT middleware for route protection
4. Build frontend login/register forms
5. Add integration tests
Output:
Created task abc123 from plan
Analyzed plan structure: Found 5 distinct implementation steps
Created 5 subtasks:
- abc124: Create database schema for users/tokens
- abc125: Implement auth controller with endpoints
- abc126: Add JWT middleware for route protection
- abc127: Build frontend login/register forms
- abc128: Add integration tests
View full structure: dex show abc123
Input plan (bugfix-plan.md):
# Plan: Fix Login Validation Bug
## Problem
Login fails when username has spaces
## Solution
Update validation regex in auth.ts line 42 to allow spaces
Output:
Created task xyz789 from plan
Plan describes a cohesive single task. No subtask breakdown needed.
View task: dex show xyz789
Input plan (full-auth-plan.md):
# Plan: Complete User Authentication System
## Phase 1: Backend Infrastructure
1. Create database schema for users and sessions
2. Implement password hashing with bcrypt
3. Add JWT token generation and validation
## Phase 2: API Endpoints
1. POST /auth/register - User registration
2. POST /auth/login - User login
3. POST /auth/logout - Session invalidation
4. POST /auth/reset-password - Password reset flow
## Phase 3: Frontend Integration
1. Login/register forms with validation
2. Protected route components
3. Session persistence with refresh tokens
Output:
Created epic abc123 from plan
Analyzed plan structure: Found 3 major phases with sub-items
Created as epic with 3 tasks:
- def456: Backend Infrastructure (3 subtasks)
- ghi789: API Endpoints (4 subtasks)
- jkl012: Frontend Integration (3 subtasks)
View full structure: dex list abc123
/dex-plan <file> --priority 2 # Set priority
/dex-plan <file> --parent abc123 # Create as subtask
Once created, you can:
dex show <task-id>dex create "..." --parent <task-id> --description "..."dex complete <task-id> --result "..."Run dex show <task-id> to see the full task structure including any automatically created subtasks.
These instructions are for the skill agent executing /dex-plan. Follow this workflow exactly:
Execute the dex plan command with the provided markdown file:
dex plan <markdown-file> [options]
This creates the parent task and returns its ID. Capture this ID for subsequent steps.
After creating the main task, read it back to analyze its structure:
dex show <task-id>
Examine the context field (which contains the full markdown) for breakdown potential.
Analyze the plan structure and decide: Should this be broken down into subtasks?
Numbered or bulleted implementation lists (3-7 items):
## Implementation
1. Create database schema → SUBTASK
2. Build API endpoints → SUBTASK
3. Add frontend components → SUBTASK
Clear subsections under implementation/tasks/steps:
### 1. Backend Changes
- Modify server.ts
- Add authentication
→ SUBTASK: "Backend Changes" with this context
### 2. Frontend Updates
- Update login form
- Add error handling
→ SUBTASK: "Frontend Updates" with this context
File-specific sections:
### `src/auth.ts` - Add JWT validation
[Details about changes]
→ SUBTASK: "Add JWT validation to auth.ts"
### `src/middleware.ts` - Create auth middleware
[Details about changes]
→ SUBTASK: "Create auth middleware"
Sequential phases:
## Implementation Sequence
**Phase 1: Database Layer**
[Details] → SUBTASK
**Phase 2: API Layer**
[Details] → SUBTASK
**Phase 3: Frontend Layer**
[Details] → SUBTASK
For each identified subtask:
Extract description: Use the list item text, heading, or section title
Extract context: Include relevant details from that section
Create the subtask:
dex create "<subtask-description>" \
--parent <parent-task-id> \
--description "<extracted-context-with-parent-reference>"
If subtasks were created:
Created task <id> from plan
Analyzed plan structure: Found <N> distinct implementation steps
Created <N> subtasks:
- <subtask-id-1>: <description-1>
- <subtask-id-2>: <description-2>
- <subtask-id-3>: <description-3>
...
View full structure: dex show <parent-id>
If no breakdown occurred:
Created task <id> from plan
Plan describes a cohesive single task. No subtask breakdown needed.
View task: dex show <id>
Example 1: Numbered list
## Implementation Steps
1. Create User model with email, password fields
2. Add POST /api/auth/register endpoint
3. Implement JWT token generation
Extracted subtasks:
dex create "Create User model with email, password fields" \
--parent abc123 \
--description "Create a User model with email and password fields. This is part of 'Add Authentication System'."
dex create "Add POST /api/auth/register endpoint" \
--parent abc123 \
--description "Add POST /api/auth/register endpoint to handle user registration. This is part of 'Add Authentication System'."
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
dex-plan fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend dex-plan for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in dex-plan — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
dex-plan fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
dex-plan has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
dex-plan is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: dex-plan is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
dex-plan reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for dex-plan matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
dex-plan is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 43