pentest-checklist▌
davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Provide a comprehensive checklist for planning, executing, and following up on penetration tests. Ensure thorough preparation, proper scoping, and effective remediation of discovered vulnerabilities.
Pentest Checklist
Purpose
Provide a comprehensive checklist for planning, executing, and following up on penetration tests. Ensure thorough preparation, proper scoping, and effective remediation of discovered vulnerabilities.
Inputs/Prerequisites
- Clear business objectives for testing
- Target environment information
- Budget and timeline constraints
- Stakeholder contacts and authorization
- Legal agreements and scope documents
Outputs/Deliverables
- Defined pentest scope and objectives
- Prepared testing environment
- Security monitoring data
- Vulnerability findings report
- Remediation plan and verification
Core Workflow
Phase 1: Scope Definition
Define Objectives
- Clarify testing purpose - Determine goals (find vulnerabilities, compliance, customer assurance)
- Validate pentest necessity - Ensure penetration test is the right solution
- Align outcomes with objectives - Define success criteria
Reference Questions:
- Why are you doing this pentest?
- What specific outcomes do you expect?
- What will you do with the findings?
Know Your Test Types
| Type | Purpose | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| External Pentest | Assess external attack surface | Public-facing systems |
| Internal Pentest | Assess insider threat risk | Internal network |
| Web Application | Find application vulnerabilities | Specific applications |
| Social Engineering | Test human security | Employees, processes |
| Red Team | Full adversary simulation | Entire organization |
Enumerate Likely Threats
- Identify high-risk areas - Where could damage occur?
- Assess data sensitivity - What data could be compromised?
- Review legacy systems - Old systems often have vulnerabilities
- Map critical assets - Prioritize testing targets
Define Scope
- List in-scope systems - IPs, domains, applications
- Define out-of-scope items - Systems to avoid
- Set testing boundaries - What techniques are allowed?
- Document exclusions - Third-party systems, production data
Budget Planning
| Factor | Consideration |
|---|---|
| Asset Value | Higher value = higher investment |
| Complexity | More systems = more time |
| Depth Required | Thorough testing costs more |
| Reputation Value | Brand-name firms cost more |
Budget Reality Check:
- Cheap pentests often produce poor results
- Align budget with asset criticality
- Consider ongoing vs. one-time testing
Phase 2: Environment Preparation
Prepare Test Environment
- Production vs. staging decision - Determine where to test
- Set testing limits - No DoS on production
- Schedule testing window - Minimize business impact
- Create test accounts - Provide appropriate access levels
Environment Options:
Production - Realistic but risky
Staging - Safer but may differ from production
Clone - Ideal but resource-intensive
Run Preliminary Scans
- Execute vulnerability scanners - Find known issues first
- Fix obvious vulnerabilities - Don't waste pentest time
- Document existing issues - Share with testers
Common Pre-Scan Tools:
# Network vulnerability scan
nmap -sV --script vuln TARGET
# Web vulnerability scan
nikto -h http://TARGET
Review Security Policy
- Verify compliance requirements - GDPR, PCI-DSS, HIPAA
- Document data handling rules - Sensitive data procedures
- Confirm legal authorization - Get written permission
Notify Hosting Provider
- Check provider policies - What testing is allowed?
- Submit authorization requests - AWS, Azure, GCP requirements
- Document approvals - Keep records
Cloud Provider Policies:
- AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/security/penetration-testing/
- Azure: https://docs.microsoft.com/security/pentest
- GCP: https://cloud.google.com/security/overview
Freeze Developments
- Stop deployments during testing - Maintain consistent environment
- Document current versions - Record system states
- Avoid critical patches - Unless security emergency
Phase 3: Expertise Selection
Find Qualified Pentesters
- Seek recommendations - Ask trusted sources
- Verify credentials - OSCP, GPEN, CEH, CREST
- Check references - Talk to previous clients
- Match expertise to scope - Web, network, mobile specialists
Evaluation Criteria:
| Factor | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Experience | Years in field, similar projects |
| Methodology | OWASP, PTES, custom approach |
| Reporting | Sample reports, detail level |
| Communication | Availability, update frequency |
Define Methodology
- Select testing standard - PTES, OWASP, NIST
- Determine access level - Black box, gray box, white box
- Agree on techniques - Manual vs. automated testing
- Set communication schedule - Updates and escalation
Testing Approaches:
| Type | Access Level | Simulates |
|---|---|---|
| Black Box | No information | External attacker |
| Gray Box | Partial access | Insider with limited access |
| White Box | Full access | Insider/detailed audit |
Define Report Format
- Review sample reports - Ensure quality meets needs
- Specify required sections - Executive summary, technical details
- Request machine-readable output - CSV, XML for tracking
- Agree on risk ratings - CVSS, custom scale
Report Should Include:
- Executive summary for management
- Technical findings with evidence
- Risk ratings and prioritization
- Remediation recommendations
- Retesting guidance
Phase 4: Monitoring
Implement Security Monitoring
- Deploy IDS/IPS - Intrusion detection systems
- Enable logging - Comprehensive audit trails
- Configure SIEM - Centralized log analysis
- Set up alerting - Real-time notifications
Monitoring Tools:
# Check security logs
tail -f /var/log/auth.log
tail -f /var/log/apache2/access.log
# Monitor network
tcpdump -i eth0 -w capture.pcap
Configure Logging
- Centralize logs - Aggregate from all systems
- Set retention periods - Keep logs for analysis
- Enable detailed logging - Application and system level
- Test log collection - Verify all sources working
Key Logs to Monitor:
- Authentication events
- Application errors
- Network connections
- File access
- System changes
Monitor Exception Tools
- Track error rates - Unusual spikes indicate testing
- Brief operations team - Distinguish testing from attacks
- Document baseline - Normal vs. pentest activity
Watch Security Tools
- Review IDS alerts - Separate pentest from real attacks
- Monitor WAF logs - Track blocked attempts
- Check endpoint protection - Antivirus detections
Phase 5: Remediation
Ensure Backups
- Verify backup integrity - Test restoration
- Document recovery procedures - Know how to restore
- Separate backup access - Protect from testing
Reserve Remediation Time
- Allocate team availability - Post-pentest analysis
- Schedule fix implementation - Address findings
- Plan verification testing - Confirm fixes work
Patch During Testing Policy
- Generally avoid patching - Maintain consistent environment
- Exception for critical issues - Security emergencies only
- Communicate changes - Inform pentesters of any changes
Cleanup Procedure
- Remove test artifacts - Backdoors, scripts, files
- Delete test accounts - Remove pentester access
- Restore configurations - Return to original state
- Verify cleanup complete - Audit all changes
Schedule Next Pentest
- Determine frequency - Annual, quarterly, after changes
- Consider continuous testing - Bug bounty, ongoing assessments
- Budget for future tests - Plan ahead
Testing Frequency Factors:
- Release frequency
- Regulatory requirements
- Risk tolerance
- Past findings severity
Quick Reference
Pre-Pentest Checklist
□ Scope defined and documented
□ Authorization obtained
□ Environment prepared
□ Hosting provider notified
□ Team briefed
□ Monitoring enabled
□ Backups verified
Post-Pentest Checklist
□ Report received and reviewed
□ Findings prioritized
□ Remediation assigned
□ Fixes implemented
□ Verification testing scheduled
□ Environment cleaned up
□ Next test scheduled
Constraints
- Production testing carries inherent risks
- Budget limitations affect thoroughness
- Time constraints may limit coverage
- Tester expertise varies significantly
- Findings become stale quickly
Examples
Example 1: Quick Scope Definition
**Target:** Corporate web application (app.company.com)
**Type:** Gray box web application pentest
**Duration:** 5 business days
**Excluded:** DoS testing, production database access
**Access:** Standard user account provided
Example 2: Monitoring Setup
# Enable comprehensive logging
sudo systemctl restart rsyslog
sudo systemctl restart auditd
# Start packet capture
tcpdump -i eth0 -w /tmp/pentest_capture.pcap &
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Scope creep | Document and require change approval |
| Testing impacts production | Schedule off-hours, use staging |
| Findings disputed | Provide detailed evidence, retest |
| Remediation delayed | Prioritize by risk, set deadlines |
| Budget exceeded | Define clear scope, fixed-price contracts |
How to use pentest-checklist on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add pentest-checklist
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches pentest-checklist from GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate pentest-checklist. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /pentest-checklist) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★56 reviews- ★★★★★Harper Anderson· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pentest-checklist is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Harper Iyer· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend pentest-checklist for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Naina White· Dec 24, 2024
pentest-checklist has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Min Flores· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in pentest-checklist — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 16, 2024
pentest-checklist is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for pentest-checklist matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Daniel Torres· Nov 19, 2024
pentest-checklist has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Jin Thomas· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for pentest-checklist matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Naina Jackson· Nov 15, 2024
pentest-checklist fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Meera Sharma· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pentest-checklist is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 56