langsmith-observability▌
davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Development platform for debugging, evaluating, and monitoring language models and AI applications.
LangSmith - LLM Observability Platform
Development platform for debugging, evaluating, and monitoring language models and AI applications.
When to use LangSmith
Use LangSmith when:
- Debugging LLM application issues (prompts, chains, agents)
- Evaluating model outputs systematically against datasets
- Monitoring production LLM systems
- Building regression testing for AI features
- Analyzing latency, token usage, and costs
- Collaborating on prompt engineering
Key features:
- Tracing: Capture inputs, outputs, latency for all LLM calls
- Evaluation: Systematic testing with built-in and custom evaluators
- Datasets: Create test sets from production traces or manually
- Monitoring: Track metrics, errors, and costs in production
- Integrations: Works with OpenAI, Anthropic, LangChain, LlamaIndex
Use alternatives instead:
- Weights & Biases: Deep learning experiment tracking, model training
- MLflow: General ML lifecycle, model registry focus
- Arize/WhyLabs: ML monitoring, data drift detection
Quick start
Installation
pip install langsmith
# Set environment variables
export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your-api-key"
export LANGSMITH_TRACING=true
Basic tracing with @traceable
from langsmith import traceable
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
@traceable
def generate_response(prompt: str) -> str:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
# Automatically traced to LangSmith
result = generate_response("What is machine learning?")
OpenAI wrapper (automatic tracing)
from langsmith.wrappers import wrap_openai
from openai import OpenAI
# Wrap client for automatic tracing
client = wrap_openai(OpenAI())
# All calls automatically traced
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
Core concepts
Runs and traces
A run is a single execution unit (LLM call, chain, tool). Runs form hierarchical traces showing the full execution flow.
from langsmith import traceable
@traceable(run_type="chain")
def process_query(query: str) -> str:
# Parent run
context = retrieve_context(query) # Child run
response = generate_answer(query, context) # Child run
return response
@traceable(run_type="retriever")
def retrieve_context(query: str) -> list:
return vector_store.search(query)
@traceable(run_type="llm")
def generate_answer(query: str, context: list) -> str:
return llm.invoke(f"Context: {context}\n\nQuestion: {query}")
Projects
Projects organize related runs. Set via environment or code:
import os
os.environ["LANGSMITH_PROJECT"] = "my-project"
# Or per-function
@traceable(project_name="my-project")
def my_function():
pass
Client API
from langsmith import Client
client = Client()
# List runs
runs = list(client.list_runs(
project_name="my-project",
filter='eq(status, "success")',
limit=100
))
# Get run details
run = client.read_run(run_id="...")
# Create feedback
client.create_feedback(
run_id="...",
key="correctness",
score=0.9,
comment="Good answer"
)
Datasets and evaluation
Create dataset
from langsmith import Client
client = Client()
# Create dataset
dataset = client.create_dataset("qa-test-set", description="QA evaluation")
# Add examples
client.create_examples(
inputs=[
{"question": "What is Python?"},
{"question": "What is ML?"}
],
outputs=[
{"answer": "A programming language"},
{"answer": "Machine learning"}
],
dataset_id=dataset.id
)
Run evaluation
from langsmith import evaluate
def my_model(inputs: dict) -> dict:
# Your model logic
return {"answer": generate_answer(inputs["question"])}
def correctness_evaluator(run, example):
prediction = run.outputs["answer"]
reference = example.outputs["answer"]
score = 1.0 if reference.lower() in prediction.lower() else 0.0
return {"key": "correctness", "score": score}
results = evaluate(
my_model,
data="qa-test-set",
evaluators=[correctness_evaluator],
experiment_prefix="v1"
)
print(f"Average score: {results.aggregate_metrics['correctness']}")
Built-in evaluators
from langsmith.evaluation import LangChainStringEvaluator
# Use LangChain evaluators
results = evaluate(
my_model,
data="qa-test-set",
evaluators=[
LangChainStringEvaluator("qa")how to use langsmith-observabilityHow to use langsmith-observability on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add langsmith-observability
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill langsmith-observabilityThe skills CLI fetches langsmith-observability from GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/langsmith-observabilityReload or restart Cursor to activate langsmith-observability. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /langsmith-observability) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
✓Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
✓Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.6★★★★★40 reviews- ★★★★★Charlotte Gupta· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: langsmith-observability is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024
We added langsmith-observability from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Daniel Bansal· Dec 8, 2024
langsmith-observability fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Amina Okafor· Nov 19, 2024
langsmith-observability has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024
langsmith-observability fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kofi Ramirez· Nov 15, 2024
langsmith-observability is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 7, 2024
langsmith-observability reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Oct 26, 2024
langsmith-observability is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Li Choi· Oct 10, 2024
langsmith-observability fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 6, 2024
langsmith-observability has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 40
1 / 4