BigCode Evaluation Harness evaluates code generation models across 15+ benchmarks including HumanEval, MBPP, and MultiPL-E (18 languages).
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example: Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example: Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example: Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example: Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill evaluating-code-modelsCompatible with
Supported agents
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionevaluating-code-modelsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill evaluating-code-modelsFetches evaluating-code-models from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/evaluating-code-models
Restart Cursor to activate evaluating-code-models. Access via /evaluating-code-modelsin your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Time estimate: 30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Prerequisites
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
improve
shadcn/improve · code · tag: code
python-expert-best-practices-code-review
wispbit-ai/skills · Backend · tag: code
wordpress-elementor
jezweb/claude-skills · Productivity · same category
nestjs-best-practices
kadajett/agent-nestjs-skills · Productivity · same category
find-skills
kimyx0207/findskill · Productivity · same category
pagespeed-insights
enderpuentes/ai-agent-skills · Productivity · same category
Useful defaults in evaluating-code-models — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
evaluating-code-models reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
evaluating-code-models has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
I recommend evaluating-code-models for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
evaluating-code-models is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
evaluating-code-models reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for evaluating-code-models matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend evaluating-code-models for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
evaluating-code-models fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for evaluating-code-models matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 75