Search academic databases, extract metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries.
Works with
Supports Google Scholar and PubMed searches with advanced filtering (date ranges, MeSH terms, publication types) and batch processing
Converts DOIs, PMIDs, arXiv IDs, and URLs to complete metadata via CrossRef, PubMed, and arXiv APIs
Validates BibTeX files for accuracy, completeness, duplicates, and DOI correctness with auto-fix capabilities
Formats and cleans BibTeX en
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versioncitation-managementExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches citation-management from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate citation-management. Access via /citation-management in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
1
total installs
1
this week
24.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
24.2K
stars
Manage citations systematically throughout the research and writing process. This skill provides tools and strategies for searching academic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed), extracting accurate metadata from multiple sources (CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv), validating citation information, and generating properly formatted BibTeX entries.
Critical for maintaining citation accuracy, avoiding reference errors, and ensuring reproducible research. Integrates seamlessly with the literature-review skill for comprehensive research workflows.
Use this skill when:
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
When to add schematics:
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
Citation management follows a systematic process:
Goal: Find relevant papers using academic search engines.
Google Scholar provides the most comprehensive coverage across disciplines.
Basic Search:
# Search for papers on a topic
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "CRISPR gene editing" \
--limit 50 \
--output results.json
# Search with year filter
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "machine learning protein folding" \
--year-start 2020 \
--year-end 2024 \
--limit 100 \
--output ml_proteins.json
Advanced Search Strategies (see references/google_scholar_search.md):
"deep learning"author:LeCunintitle:"neural networks"machine learning -surveyBest Practices:
PubMed specializes in biomedical and life sciences literature (35+ million citations).
Basic Search:
# Search PubMed
python scripts/search_pubmed.py "Alzheimer's disease treatment" \
--limit 100 \
--output alzheimers.json
# Search with MeSH terms and filters
python scripts/search_pubmed.py \
--query '"Alzheimer Disease"[MeSH] AND "Drug Therapy"[MeSH]' \
--date-start 2020 \
--date-end 2024 \
--publication-types "Clinical Trial,Review" \
--output alzheimers_trials.json
Advanced PubMed Queries (see references/pubmed_search.md):
"Diabetes Mellitus"[MeSH]"cancer"[Title], "Smith J"[Author]AND, OR, NOT2020:2024[Publication Date]"Review"[Publication Type]Best Practices:
Goal: Convert paper identifiers (DOI, PMID, arXiv ID) to complete, accurate metadata.
For single DOIs, use the quick conversion tool:
# Convert single DOI
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
# Convert multiple DOIs from a file
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py --input dois.txt --output references.bib
# Different output formats
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/nature12345 --format json
For DOIs, PMIDs, arXiv IDs, or URLs:
# Extract from DOI
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --doi 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
# Extract from PMID
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --pmid 34265844
# Extract from arXiv ID
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --arxiv 2103.14030
# Extract from URL
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --url "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2"
# Batch extraction from file (mixed identifiers)
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --input identifiers.txt --output citations.bib
Metadata Sources (see references/metadata_extraction.md):
CrossRef API: Primary source for DOIs
PubMed E-utilities: Biomedical literature
arXiv API: Preprints in physics, math, CS, q-bio
DataCite API: Research datasets, software, other resources
What Gets Extracted:
Goal: Generate clean, properly formatted BibTeX entries.
See references/bibtex_formatting.md for complete guide.
Common Entry Types:
@article: Journal articles (most common)@book: Books@inproceedings: Conference papers@incollection: Book chapters@phdthesis: Dissertations@misc: Preprints, software, datasetsRequired Fields by Type:
@article{citationkey,
author = {Last1, First1 and Last2, First2},
title = {Article Title},
journal = {Journal Name},
year = {2024},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {123--145},
doi = {10.1234/example}
}
@inproceedings{citationkey,
author = {Last, First},
title = {Paper Title},
booktitle = {Conference Name},
year = {2024},
pages = {1--10}
}
@book{citationkey,
author = {Last, First},
title = {Book Title},
publisher = {Publisher Name},
year = {2024}
}
Use the formatter to standardize BibTeX files:
# Format and clean BibTeX file
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
--output formatted_references.bib
# Sort entries by citation key
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
--sort key \
--output sorted_references.bib
# Sort by year (newest first)
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
--sort year \
--descending \
--output sorted_references.bib
# Remove duplicates
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
--deduplicate \
--output clean_references.bib
# Validate and report issues
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
--validate \
--report validation_report.txt
Formatting Operations:
Goal: Verify all citations are accurate and complete.
# Validate BibTeX file
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib
# Validate and fix common issues
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib \
--auto-fix \
--output validated_references.bib
# Generate detailed validation report
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib \
--report validation_report.json \
--verbose
Validation Checks (see references/citation_validation.md):
DOI Verification:
Required Fields:
Data Consistency:
Duplicate Detection:
Format Compliance:
Validation Output:
{
"total_entries": 150,
"valid_entries": 145,
"errors": [
{
"citation_key": "Smith2023",
"error_type": "missing_field",
"field": "journal",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"citation_key": "Jones2022",
"error_type": "invalid_doi",
"doi": "10.1234/broken",
"severity": "high"
}
],
"warnings": [
{
"citation_key": "Brown2021",
"warning_type": "possible_duplicate",
"duplicate_of": "Brown2021a",
"severity": "medium"
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
ml-paper-writing
76davila7/claude-code-templates
AI/MLsame repogrill-me
704mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
217parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
163cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
142ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categorynutritional-specialist
140ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.7★★★★★51 reviews- AArjun Gupta★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in citation-management — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- LLayla Kapoor★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
citation-management has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
Keeps context tight: citation-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- SSakura Yang★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
We added citation-management from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- IIshan Chawla★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
I recommend citation-management for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- KKaira Martin★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: citation-management is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- AArjun Farah★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for citation-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- AAnika Sanchez★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
citation-management reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- IIshan Gupta★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
citation-management fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- RRahul Santra★★★★★Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for citation-management matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 51
1 / 6Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.