c4-architecture

davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill c4-architecture
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Generate software architecture documentation using C4 model diagrams in Mermaid syntax.

skill.md

C4 Architecture Documentation

Generate software architecture documentation using C4 model diagrams in Mermaid syntax.

Workflow

  1. Understand scope - Determine which C4 level(s) are needed based on audience
  2. Analyze codebase - Explore the system to identify components, containers, and relationships
  3. Generate diagrams - Create Mermaid C4 diagrams at appropriate abstraction levels
  4. Document - Write diagrams to markdown files with explanatory context

C4 Diagram Levels

Select the appropriate level based on the documentation need:

Level Diagram Type Audience Shows When to Create
1 C4Context Everyone System + external actors Always (required)
2 C4Container Technical Apps, databases, services Always (required)
3 C4Component Developers Internal components Only if adds value
4 C4Deployment DevOps Infrastructure nodes For production systems
- C4Dynamic Technical Request flows (numbered) For complex workflows

Key Insight: "Context + Container diagrams are sufficient for most software development teams." Only create Component/Code diagrams when they genuinely add value.

Quick Start Examples

System Context (Level 1)

C4Context
  title System Context - Workout Tracker

  Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts and exercises")
  System(app, "Workout Tracker", "Vue PWA for tracking strength and CrossFit workouts")
  System_Ext(browser, "Web Browser", "Stores data in IndexedDB")

  Rel(user, app, "Uses")
  Rel(app, browser, "Persists data to", "IndexedDB")

Container Diagram (Level 2)

C4Container
  title Container Diagram - Workout Tracker

  Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts")

  Container_Boundary(app, "Workout Tracker PWA") {
    Container(spa, "SPA", "Vue 3, TypeScript", "Single-page application")
    Container(pinia, "State Management", "Pinia", "Manages application state")
    ContainerDb(indexeddb, "IndexedDB", "Dexie", "Local workout storage")
  }

  Rel(user, spa, "Uses")
  Rel(spa, pinia, "Reads/writes state")
  Rel(pinia, indexeddb, "Persists", "Dexie ORM")

Component Diagram (Level 3)

C4Component
  title Component Diagram - Workout Feature

  Container(views, "Views", "Vue Router pages")

  Container_Boundary(workout, "Workout Feature") {
    Component(useWorkout, "useWorkout", "Composable", "Workout execution state")
    Component(useTimer, "useTimer", "Composable", "Timer state machine")
    Component(workoutRepo, "WorkoutRepository", "Dexie", "Workout persistence")
  }

  Rel(views, useWorkout, "Uses")
  Rel(useWorkout, useTimer, "Controls")
  Rel(useWorkout, workoutRepo, "Saves to")

Dynamic Diagram (Request Flow)

C4Dynamic
  title Dynamic Diagram - User Sign In Flow

  ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "User credentials")
  Container(spa, "Single-Page App", "React", "Banking UI")

  Container_Boundary(api, "API Application") {
    Component(signIn, "Sign In Controller", "Express", "Auth endpoint")
    Component(security, "Security Service", "JWT", "Validates credentials")
  }

  Rel(spa, signIn, "1. Submit credentials", "JSON/HTTPS")
  Rel(signIn, security, "2. Validate")
  Rel(security, db, "3. Query user", "SQL")

  UpdateRelStyle(spa, signIn, $textColor="blue", $offsetY="-30")

Deployment Diagram

C4Deployment
  title Deployment Diagram - Production

  Deployment_Node(browser, "Customer Browser", "Chrome/Firefox") {
    Container(spa, "SPA", "React", "Web application")
  }

  Deployment_Node(aws, "AWS Cloud", "us-east-1") {
    Deployment_Node(ecs, "ECS Cluster", "Fargate") {
      Container(api, "API Service", "Node.js", "REST API")
    }
    Deployment_Node(rds, "RDS", "db.r5.large") {
      ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "Application data")
    }
  }

  Rel(spa, api, "API calls", "HTTPS")
  Rel(api, db, "Reads/writes", "JDBC")

Element Syntax

People and Systems

Person(alias, "Label", "Description")
Person_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description")       # External person
System(alias, "Label", "Description")
System_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description")       # External system
SystemDb(alias, "Label", "Description")         # Database system
SystemQueue(alias, "Label", "Description")      # Queue system

Containers

Container(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Container_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerQueue(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")

Components

Component(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Component_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ComponentDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")

Boundaries

Enterprise_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
System_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Container_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Boundary(alias, "Label", "type") { ... }

Relationships

Rel(from, to, "Label")
Rel(from, to, "Label", "Technology")
BiRel(from, to, "Label")                        # Bidirectional
Rel_U(from, to, "Label")                        # Upward
Rel_D(from, to, "Label")                        # Downward
Rel_L(from, to, "Label")                        # Leftward
Rel_R(from, to, "Label")                        # Rightward

Deployment Nodes

Deployment_Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... }
Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... }  # Shorthand

Styling and Layout

Layout Configuration

UpdateLayoutConfig($c4ShapeInRow="3", $c4BoundaryInRow="1")
  • $c4ShapeInRow - Number of shapes per row (default: 4)
  • $c4BoundaryInRow - Number of boundaries per row (default: 2)

Element Styling

UpdateElementStyle(alias, $fontColor="red", $bgColor="grey", $borderColor="red")

Relationship Styling

UpdateRelStyle(from, to, $textColor="blue", $lineColor="blue", $offsetX="5", $offsetY="-10")

Use $offsetX and $offsetY to fix overlapping relationship labels.

Best Practices

Essential Rules

  1. Every element must have: Name, Type, Technology (where applicable), and Description
  2. Use unidirectional arrows only - Bidirectional arrows create ambiguity
  3. Label arrows with action verbs - "Sends email using", "Reads from", not just "uses"
  4. Include technology labels - "JSON/HTTPS", "JDBC", "gRPC"
  5. Stay under 20 elements per diagram - Split complex systems into multiple diagrams

Clarity Guidelines

  1. Start at Level 1 - Context diagrams help frame the system scope
  2. One diagram per file - Keep diagrams focused on a single abstraction level
  3. Meaningful aliases - Use descriptive aliases (e.g., orderService not s1)
  4. Concise descriptions - Keep descriptions under 50 characters when possible
  5. Always include a title - "System Context diagram for [System Name]"

What to Avoid

See references/common-mistakes.md for detailed anti-patterns:

  • Confusing containers (deployable) vs components (non-deployable)
  • Modeling shared libraries as containers
  • Showing message brokers as single containers instead of individual topics
  • Adding undefined abstraction levels like "subcomponents"
  • Removing type labels to "simplify" diagrams

Microservices Guidelines

Single Team Ownership

Model each microservice as a container (or container group):

C4Container
  title Microservices - Single Team

  System_Boundary(platform, "E-commerce Platform") {
    Container(orderApi, "Order Service", "Spring Boot", "Order processing")
    ContainerDb(orderDb, "Order DB", "PostgreSQL", "Order data")
    Container(inventoryApi, "Inventory Service", "Node.js", "Stock management")
    ContainerDb(inventoryDb, "Inventory DB", "MongoDB", "Stock data")
  }

Multi-Team Ownership

Promote microservices to software systems when owned by separate teams:

C4Context
  title Microservices - Multi-Team

  Person(customer, "Customer", "Places orders")
  System(orderSystem, "Order System", "Team Alpha")
  System(inventorySystem, "Inventory System", "Team Beta")
  System(paymentSystem, "Payment System", "Team Gamma")

  Rel(customer, orderSystem, "Places orders")
  Rel(orderSystem, inventorySystem, "Checks stock")
  Rel(orderSystem, paymentSystem, "Processes payment")

Event-Driven Architecture

Show individual topics/queues as containers, NOT a single "Kafka" box:

C4Container
  title Event-Driven Architecture

  Container(orderService, "Order Service", "Java", "Creates orders")
  Container(stockService, "Stock Service", "Java", "Manages inventory")
  ContainerQueue(orderTopic, "order.created", "Kafka", "Order events")
  ContainerQueue(stockTopic, "stock.reserved", "Kafka", "Stock events")

  Rel(orderService, orderTopic, "Publishes to")
  Rel(stockService, orderTopic, "Subscribes to")
  Rel(stockService, stockTopic, "Publishes to")
  Rel(orderService, stockTopic, "Subscribes to")

Output Location

Write architecture documentation to docs/architecture/ with naming convention:

  • c4-context.md - System context diagram
  • c4-containers.md - Container diagram
  • c4-components-{feature}.md - Component diagrams per feature
  • c4-deployment.md - Deployment diagram
  • c4-dynamic-{flow}.md - Dynamic diagrams for specific flows

Audience-Appropriate Detail

Audience Recommended Diagrams
Executives System Context only
Product Managers Context + Container
Architects Context + Container + key Components
Developers All levels as needed
DevOps Container + Deployment

References

how to use c4-architecture

How to use c4-architecture on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add c4-architecture
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill c4-architecture

The skills CLI fetches c4-architecture from GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/c4-architecture

Reload or restart Cursor to activate c4-architecture. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /c4-architecture) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.428 reviews
  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in c4-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024

    c4-architecture fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Hiroshi Thompson· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend c4-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Camila Rao· Dec 4, 2024

    We added c4-architecture from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Kabir Flores· Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: c4-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 15, 2024

    c4-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakura Agarwal· Oct 18, 2024

    c4-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 6, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: c4-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Tariq Menon· Sep 21, 2024

    c4-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Zara White· Aug 12, 2024

    Keeps context tight: c4-architecture is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

showing 1-10 of 28

1 / 3