Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents, inspired by Cline and OpenAI Codex.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionautonomous-agent-patternsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches autonomous-agent-patterns from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate autonomous-agent-patterns. Access via /autonomous-agent-patterns in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
24.2K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
24.2K
stars
Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents, inspired by Cline and OpenAI Codex.
Use this skill when:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AGENT LOOP │
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Think │───▶│ Decide │───▶│ Act │ │
│ │ (Reason) │ │ (Plan) │ │ (Execute)│ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │
│ └─────────│ Observe │◀─────────┘ │
│ │ (Result) │ │
│ └──────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
class AgentLoop:
def __init__(self, llm, tools, max_iterations=50):
self.llm = llm
self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools}
self.max_iterations = max_iterations
self.history = []
def run(self, task: str) -> str:
self.history.append({"role": "user", "content": task})
for i in range(self.max_iterations):
# Think: Get LLM response with tool options
response = self.llm.chat(
messages=self.history,
tools=self._format_tools(),
tool_choice="auto"
)
# Decide: Check if agent wants to use a tool
if response.tool_calls:
for tool_call in response.tool_calls:
# Act: Execute the tool
result = self._execute_tool(tool_call)
# Observe: Add result to history
self.history.append({
"role": "tool",
"tool_call_id": tool_call.id,
"content": str(result)
})
else:
# No more tool calls = task complete
return response.content
return "Max iterations reached"
def _execute_tool(self, tool_call) -> Any:
tool = self.tools[tool_call.name]
args = json.loads(tool_call.arguments)
return tool.execute(**args)
class MultiModelAgent:
"""
Use different models for different purposes:
- Fast model for planning
- Powerful model for complex reasoning
- Specialized model for code generation
"""
def __init__(self):
self.models = {
"fast": "gpt-3.5-turbo", # Quick decisions
"smart": "gpt-4-turbo", # Complex reasoning
"code": "claude-3-sonnet", # Code generation
}
def select_model(self, task_type: str) -> str:
if task_type == "planning":
return self.models["fast"]
elif task_type == "analysis":
return self.models["smart"]
elif task_type == "code":
return self.models["code"]
return self.models["smart"]
class Tool:
"""Base class for agent tools"""
@property
def schema(self) -> dict:
"""JSON Schema for the tool"""
return {
"name": self.name,
"description": self.description,
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": self._get_parameters(),
"required": self._get_required()
}
}
def execute(self, **kwargs) -> ToolResult:
"""Execute the tool and return result"""
raise NotImplementedError
class ReadFileTool(Tool):
name = "read_file"
description = "Read the contents of a file from the filesystem"
def _get_parameters(self):
return {
"path": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Absolute path to the file"
},
"start_line": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Line to start reading from (1-indexed)"
},
"end_line": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Line to stop reading at (inclusive)"
}
}
def _get_required(self):
return ["path"]
def execute(self, path: str, start_line: int = None, end_line: int = None) -> ToolResult:
try:
with open(path, 'r') as f:
lines = f.readlines()
if start_line and end_line:
lines = lines[start_line-1:end_line]
return ToolResult(
success=True,
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
davila7/claude-code-templates
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Registry listing for autonomous-agent-patterns matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
autonomous-agent-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
We added autonomous-agent-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
We added autonomous-agent-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend autonomous-agent-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
autonomous-agent-patterns fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
autonomous-agent-patterns fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend autonomous-agent-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: autonomous-agent-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: autonomous-agent-patterns is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 63