go-naming▌
cxuu/golang-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Names should:
Go Naming Conventions
Available Scripts
scripts/check-naming.sh— Scans Go code for naming anti-patterns: SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE constants, Get-prefixed getters, bad package names (util/helper/common), and receivers named "this"/"self". Runbash scripts/check-naming.sh --helpfor options.
Core Principle
Names should:
- Not feel repetitive when used
- Take context into consideration
- Not repeat concepts that are already clear
Naming is more art than science—Go names tend to be shorter than in other languages.
Naming Decision Flow
What are you naming?
├─ Package → Short, lowercase, singular noun (no underscores, no mixedCaps)
├─ Interface → Method name + "-er" suffix when single-method (Reader, Writer)
├─ Receiver → 1-2 letter abbreviation of type (c for Client); consistent across methods
├─ Constant → MixedCaps; use iota for enums; no ALL_CAPS
├─ Exported func → Verb or verb-phrase in MixedCaps; no Get prefix for getters
├─ Variable → Length proportional to scope distance
│ ├─ Tiny scope (1-7 lines) → single letter (i, n, r)
│ ├─ Medium scope → short word (count, buf)
│ └─ Package-level / wide → descriptive (userAccountCount)
└─ Any name → Check: does it repeat package name or context? If yes, shorten it
MixedCaps (Required)
Normative: All Go identifiers must use MixedCaps.
Underscores are allowed only in: test functions (TestFoo_InvalidInput),
generated code, and OS/cgo interop.
Package Names
Normative: Packages must be lowercase with no underscores.
Short, lowercase, singular nouns. Avoid generic names like util, common,
helper — prefer specific names: stringutil, httpauth, configloader.
// Good: user, oauth2, tabwriter
// Bad: user_service, UserService, count (shadows var)
Read references/IDENTIFIERS.md when naming packages, deciding on import aliases, or choosing between generic and specific package names.
Interface Names
Advisory: One-method interfaces use "-er" suffix.
Name one-method interfaces by the method plus -er: Reader, Writer,
Formatter. Honor canonical method names (Read, Write, Close, String)
and their signatures.
Read references/IDENTIFIERS.md when defining new interfaces or implementing well-known method signatures.
Receiver Names
Normative: Receivers must be short abbreviations, used consistently.
One or two letters abbreviating the type, consistent across all methods:
func (c *Client) Connect(), func (c *Client) Send().
Never use this or self.
Read references/IDENTIFIERS.md when choosing receiver names or ensuring consistency across methods.
Constant Names
Normative: Constants use MixedCaps, never ALL_CAPS or K prefix.
Name constants by role, not value: MaxRetries not Three,
DefaultPort not Port8080.
const MaxPacketSize = 512
const defaultTimeout = 30 * time.Second
Read references/IDENTIFIERS.md when naming constants or choosing between role-based and value-based names.
Initialisms and Acronyms
Normative: Initialisms maintain consistent case throughout.
Initialisms (URL, ID, HTTP, API) must be all uppercase or all lowercase:
HTTPClient, userID, ParseURL() — not HttpClient, orderId, ParseUrl().
Read references/IDENTIFIERS.md when using initialisms in compound names or for the full case table.
Function and Method Names
Advisory: No
Getprefix for simple accessors; use verb-like names for actions.
Getter for field owner is Owner(), not GetOwner(). Setter is
SetOwner(). Use Compute or Fetch for expensive operations.
When functions differ only by type, include type at the end:
ParseInt(), ParseInt64().
Read references/IDENTIFIERS.md when designing getter/setter APIs or naming function variants.
Variable Names
Variable naming balances brevity with clarity. Key principles:
- Scope-based length: Short names (
i,v) for small scopes; longer, descriptive names for larger scopes - Single-letter conventions: Use familiar patterns (
ifor index,r/wfor reader/writer) - Avoid type in name: Use
usersnotuserSlice,namenotnameString - Prefix unexported globals: Use
_prefix for package-level unexported vars/consts to prevent shadowing
for i, v := range items { ... } // small scope
pendingOrders := filterPending(orders) // larger scope
const _defaultPort = 8080 // unexported global
Read references/VARIABLES.md when naming local variables in functions over 15 lines.
Avoiding Repetition
Go names should not feel repetitive when used. Consider the full context:
- Package + symbol:
widget.New()notwidget.NewWidget() - Receiver + method:
p.Name()notp.ProjectName() - Context + type: In package
sqldb, useConnectionnotDBConnection
Read references/REPETITION.md when a package name and its exported symbols feel redundant.
Avoid Built-In Names
Never shadow Go's predeclared identifiers (error, string, len, cap,
append, copy, new, make, etc.) as variable, parameter, or type names.
For detailed guidance: See go-declarations — "Avoid Using Built-In Names"
section.
Quick Reference
| Element | Rule | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Package | lowercase, no underscores | package httputil |
| Exported | MixedCaps, starts uppercase | func ParseURL() |
| Unexported | mixedCaps, starts lowercase | func parseURL() |
| Receiver | 1-2 letter abbreviation | func (c *Client) |
| Constant | MixedCaps, never ALL_CAPS | const MaxSize = 100 |
| Initialism | consistent case | userID, XMLAPI |
| Variable | length ~ scope size | i (small), userCount (large) |
| Built-in names | Never shadow predeclared identifiers | See go-declarations |
Validation: After renaming identifiers, run
bash scripts/check-naming.shto verify no naming anti-patterns remain. Then rungo build ./...to confirm the rename didn't break anything.
Related Skills
- Interface naming: See go-interfaces when naming interfaces with the
-ersuffix or choosing receiver types - Package naming: See go-packages when naming packages, avoiding
util/common, or resolving import collisions - Error naming: See go-error-handling when naming sentinel errors (
ErrFoo) or custom error types - Declaration scope: See go-declarations when variable name length depends on scope or when avoiding built-in shadowing
- Style principles: See go-style-core when balancing clarity vs concision in identifier names
How to use go-naming on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add go-naming
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches go-naming from GitHub repository cxuu/golang-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate go-naming. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /go-naming) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★37 reviews- ★★★★★Sakura Wang· Dec 28, 2024
go-naming fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Ghosh· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend go-naming for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Neel Harris· Oct 10, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-naming is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kwame Johnson· Sep 25, 2024
go-naming fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Advait Abbas· Sep 17, 2024
Registry listing for go-naming matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 13, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-naming is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sakura Yang· Sep 9, 2024
I recommend go-naming for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Advait Reddy· Aug 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-naming is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Perez· Aug 16, 2024
go-naming has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Layla Diallo· Aug 8, 2024
Useful defaults in go-naming — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 37