go-functional-options▌
cxuu/golang-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Functional options is a pattern where you declare an opaque Option type that records information in an internal struct. The constructor accepts a variadic number of these options and applies them to configure the result.
Functional Options Pattern
Functional options is a pattern where you declare an opaque Option type that records information in an internal struct. The constructor accepts a variadic number of these options and applies them to configure the result.
When to Use
Use functional options when:
- 3+ optional arguments on constructors or public APIs
- Extensible APIs that may gain new options over time
- Clean caller experience is important (no need to pass defaults)
The Pattern
Core Components
- Unexported
optionsstruct - holds all configuration - Exported
Optioninterface - with unexportedapplymethod - Option types - implement the interface
With*constructors - create options
Option Interface
type Option interface {
apply(*options)
}
The unexported apply method ensures only options from this package can be used.
Complete Implementation
package db
import "go.uber.org/zap"
// options holds all configuration for opening a connection.
type options struct {
cache bool
logger *zap.Logger
}
// Option configures how we open the connection.
type Option interface {
apply(*options)
}
// cacheOption implements Option for cache setting (simple type alias).
type cacheOption bool
func (c cacheOption) apply(opts *options) {
opts.cache = bool(c)
}
// WithCache enables or disables caching.
func WithCache(c bool) Option {
return cacheOption(c)
}
// loggerOption implements Option for logger setting (struct for pointers).
type loggerOption struct {
Log *zap.Logger
}
func (l loggerOption) apply(opts *options) {
opts.logger = l.Log
}
// WithLogger sets the logger for the connection.
func WithLogger(log *zap.Logger) Option {
return loggerOption{Log: log}
}
// Open creates a connection.
func Open(addr string, opts ...Option) (*Connection, error) {
// Start with defaults
options := options{
cache: defaultCache,
logger: zap.NewNop(),
}
// Apply all provided options
for _, o := range opts {
o.apply(&options)
}
// Use options.cache and options.logger...
return &Connection{}, nil
}
Usage Examples
Without Functional Options (Bad)
// Caller must always provide all parameters, even defaults
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, log)
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, log)
With Functional Options (Good)
// Only provide options when needed
db.Open(addr)
db.Open(addr, db.WithLogger(log))
db.Open(addr, db.WithCache(false))
db.Open(
addr,
db.WithCache(false),
db.WithLogger(log),
)
Comparison: Functional Options vs Config Struct
| Aspect | Functional Options | Config Struct |
|---|---|---|
| Extensibility | Add new With* functions |
Add new fields (may break) |
| Defaults | Built into constructor | Zero values or separate defaults |
| Caller experience | Only specify what differs | Must construct entire struct |
| Testability | Options are comparable | Struct comparison |
| Complexity | More boilerplate | Simpler setup |
Prefer Config Struct when: Fewer than 3 options, options rarely change, all options usually specified together, or internal APIs only.
Read references/OPTIONS-VS-STRUCTS.md when deciding between functional options and config structs, designing a config struct API with proper defaults, or evaluating the hybrid approach for complex constructors.
Why Not Closures?
An alternative implementation uses closures:
// Closure approach (not recommended)
type Option func(*options)
func WithCache(c bool) Option {
return func(o *options) { o.cache = c }
}
The interface approach is preferred because:
- Testability - Options can be compared in tests and mocks
- Debuggability - Options can implement
fmt.Stringer - Flexibility - Options can implement additional interfaces
- Visibility - Option types are visible in documentation
Quick Reference
// 1. Unexported options struct with defaults
type options struct {
field1 Type1
field2 Type2
}
// 2. Exported Option interface, unexported method
type Option interface {
apply(*options)
}
// 3. Option type + apply + With* constructor
type field1Option Type1
func (o field1Option) apply(opts *options) { opts.field1 = Type1(o) }
func WithField1(v Type1) Option { return field1Option(v) }
// 4. Constructor applies options over defaults
func New(required string, opts ...Option) (*Thing, error) {
o := options{field1: defaultField1, field2: defaultField2}
for _, opt := range opts {
opt.apply(&o)
}
// ...
}
Checklist
-
optionsstruct is unexported -
Optioninterface has unexportedapplymethod - Each option has a
With*constructor - Defaults are set before applying options
- Required parameters are separate from
...Option
Related Skills
- Interface design: See go-interfaces when designing the
Optioninterface or choosing between interface and closure approaches - Naming conventions: See go-naming when naming
With*constructors, option types, or the unexported options struct - Function design: See go-functions when organizing constructors within a file or formatting variadic signatures
- Documentation: See go-documentation when documenting
Optiontypes,With*functions, or constructor behavior
External Resources
- Self-referential functions and the design of options - Rob Pike
- Functional options for friendly APIs - Dave Cheney
How to use go-functional-options on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add go-functional-options
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches go-functional-options from GitHub repository cxuu/golang-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate go-functional-options. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /go-functional-options) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★51 reviews- ★★★★★Lucas Torres· Dec 28, 2024
go-functional-options has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
go-functional-options fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ira Yang· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-functional-options is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kiara Garcia· Dec 20, 2024
go-functional-options reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Thomas· Dec 8, 2024
go-functional-options is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Kaira Wang· Dec 4, 2024
go-functional-options fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Soo Ndlovu· Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in go-functional-options — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★James Gonzalez· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for go-functional-options matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for go-functional-options matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kofi Singh· Nov 11, 2024
We added go-functional-options from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 51