go-functional-options

cxuu/golang-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-functional-options
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Functional options is a pattern where you declare an opaque Option type that records information in an internal struct. The constructor accepts a variadic number of these options and applies them to configure the result.

skill.md

Functional Options Pattern

Functional options is a pattern where you declare an opaque Option type that records information in an internal struct. The constructor accepts a variadic number of these options and applies them to configure the result.

When to Use

Use functional options when:

  • 3+ optional arguments on constructors or public APIs
  • Extensible APIs that may gain new options over time
  • Clean caller experience is important (no need to pass defaults)

The Pattern

Core Components

  1. Unexported options struct - holds all configuration
  2. Exported Option interface - with unexported apply method
  3. Option types - implement the interface
  4. With* constructors - create options

Option Interface

type Option interface {
    apply(*options)
}

The unexported apply method ensures only options from this package can be used.

Complete Implementation

package db

import "go.uber.org/zap"

// options holds all configuration for opening a connection.
type options struct {
    cache  bool
    logger *zap.Logger
}

// Option configures how we open the connection.
type Option interface {
    apply(*options)
}

// cacheOption implements Option for cache setting (simple type alias).
type cacheOption bool

func (c cacheOption) apply(opts *options) {
    opts.cache = bool(c)
}

// WithCache enables or disables caching.
func WithCache(c bool) Option {
    return cacheOption(c)
}

// loggerOption implements Option for logger setting (struct for pointers).
type loggerOption struct {
    Log *zap.Logger
}

func (l loggerOption) apply(opts *options) {
    opts.logger = l.Log
}

// WithLogger sets the logger for the connection.
func WithLogger(log *zap.Logger) Option {
    return loggerOption{Log: log}
}

// Open creates a connection.
func Open(addr string, opts ...Option) (*Connection, error) {
    // Start with defaults
    options := options{
        cache:  defaultCache,
        logger: zap.NewNop(),
    }

    // Apply all provided options
    for _, o := range opts {
        o.apply(&options)
    }

    // Use options.cache and options.logger...
    return &Connection{}, nil
}

Usage Examples

Without Functional Options (Bad)

// Caller must always provide all parameters, even defaults
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, db.DefaultCache, log)
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, zap.NewNop())
db.Open(addr, false /* cache */, log)

With Functional Options (Good)

// Only provide options when needed
db.Open(addr)
db.Open(addr, db.WithLogger(log))
db.Open(addr, db.WithCache(false))
db.Open(
    addr,
    db.WithCache(false),
    db.WithLogger(log),
)

Comparison: Functional Options vs Config Struct

Aspect Functional Options Config Struct
Extensibility Add new With* functions Add new fields (may break)
Defaults Built into constructor Zero values or separate defaults
Caller experience Only specify what differs Must construct entire struct
Testability Options are comparable Struct comparison
Complexity More boilerplate Simpler setup

Prefer Config Struct when: Fewer than 3 options, options rarely change, all options usually specified together, or internal APIs only.

Read references/OPTIONS-VS-STRUCTS.md when deciding between functional options and config structs, designing a config struct API with proper defaults, or evaluating the hybrid approach for complex constructors.

Why Not Closures?

An alternative implementation uses closures:

// Closure approach (not recommended)
type Option func(*options)

func WithCache(c bool) Option {
    return func(o *options) { o.cache = c }
}

The interface approach is preferred because:

  1. Testability - Options can be compared in tests and mocks
  2. Debuggability - Options can implement fmt.Stringer
  3. Flexibility - Options can implement additional interfaces
  4. Visibility - Option types are visible in documentation

Quick Reference

// 1. Unexported options struct with defaults
type options struct {
    field1 Type1
    field2 Type2
}

// 2. Exported Option interface, unexported method
type Option interface {
    apply(*options)
}

// 3. Option type + apply + With* constructor
type field1Option Type1

func (o field1Option) apply(opts *options) { opts.field1 = Type1(o) }
func WithField1(v Type1) Option            { return field1Option(v) }

// 4. Constructor applies options over defaults
func New(required string, opts ...Option) (*Thing, error) {
    o := options{field1: defaultField1, field2: defaultField2}
    for _, opt := range opts {
        opt.apply(&o)
    }
    // ...
}

Checklist

  • options struct is unexported
  • Option interface has unexported apply method
  • Each option has a With* constructor
  • Defaults are set before applying options
  • Required parameters are separate from ...Option

Related Skills

  • Interface design: See go-interfaces when designing the Option interface or choosing between interface and closure approaches
  • Naming conventions: See go-naming when naming With* constructors, option types, or the unexported options struct
  • Function design: See go-functions when organizing constructors within a file or formatting variadic signatures
  • Documentation: See go-documentation when documenting Option types, With* functions, or constructor behavior

External Resources

how to use go-functional-options

How to use go-functional-options on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add go-functional-options
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-functional-options

The skills CLI fetches go-functional-options from GitHub repository cxuu/golang-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/go-functional-options

Reload or restart Cursor to activate go-functional-options. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /go-functional-options) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.751 reviews
  • Lucas Torres· Dec 28, 2024

    go-functional-options has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024

    go-functional-options fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Ira Yang· Dec 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: go-functional-options is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Kiara Garcia· Dec 20, 2024

    go-functional-options reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Hiroshi Thomas· Dec 8, 2024

    go-functional-options is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kaira Wang· Dec 4, 2024

    go-functional-options fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Soo Ndlovu· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in go-functional-options — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • James Gonzalez· Nov 23, 2024

    Registry listing for go-functional-options matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for go-functional-options matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Kofi Singh· Nov 11, 2024

    We added go-functional-options from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 51

1 / 6