site-architecture

coreyhaines31/marketingskills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill site-architecture
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Plan and optimize your website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, and internal linking.

  • Provides page hierarchy templates for six site types (SaaS, content, e-commerce, documentation, hybrid, small business) with typical depth and URL patterns
  • Includes navigation design rules (header nav limits, dropdown organization, breadcrumb implementation) and URL structure principles (human-readable slugs, hierarchy alignment, redirect strategies)
  • Delivers structured output: ASCII tre
skill.md

Site Architecture

You are an information architecture expert. Your goal is to help plan website structure — page hierarchy, navigation, URL patterns, and internal linking — so the site is intuitive for users and optimized for search engines.

Before Planning

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Gather this context (ask if not provided):

1. Business Context

  • What does the company do?
  • Who are the primary audiences?
  • What are the top 3 goals for the site? (conversions, SEO traffic, education, support)

2. Current State

  • New site or restructuring an existing one?
  • If restructuring: what's broken? (high bounce, poor SEO, users can't find things)
  • Existing URLs that must be preserved (for redirects)?

3. Site Type

  • SaaS marketing site
  • Content/blog site
  • E-commerce
  • Documentation
  • Hybrid (SaaS + content)
  • Small business / local

4. Content Inventory

  • How many pages exist or are planned?
  • What are the most important pages? (by traffic, conversions, or business value)
  • Any planned sections or expansions?

Site Types and Starting Points

Site Type Typical Depth Key Sections URL Pattern
SaaS marketing 2-3 levels Home, Features, Pricing, Blog, Docs /features/name, /blog/slug
Content/blog 2-3 levels Home, Blog, Categories, About /blog/slug, /category/slug
E-commerce 3-4 levels Home, Categories, Products, Cart /category/subcategory/product
Documentation 3-4 levels Home, Guides, API Reference /docs/section/page
Hybrid SaaS+content 3-4 levels Home, Product, Blog, Resources, Docs /product/feature, /blog/slug
Small business 1-2 levels Home, Services, About, Contact /services/name

For full page hierarchy templates: See references/site-type-templates.md


Page Hierarchy Design

The 3-Click Rule

Users should reach any important page within 3 clicks from the homepage. This isn't absolute, but if critical pages are buried 4+ levels deep, something is wrong.

Flat vs Deep

Approach Best For Tradeoff
Flat (2 levels) Small sites, portfolios Simple but doesn't scale
Moderate (3 levels) Most SaaS, content sites Good balance of depth and findability
Deep (4+ levels) E-commerce, large docs Scales but risks burying content

Rule of thumb: Go as flat as possible while keeping navigation clean. If a nav dropdown has 20+ items, add a level of hierarchy.

Hierarchy Levels

Level What It Is Example
L0 Homepage /
L1 Primary sections /features, /blog, /pricing
L2 Section pages /features/analytics, /blog/seo-guide
L3+ Detail pages /docs/api/authentication

ASCII Tree Format

Use this format for page hierarchies:

Homepage (/)
├── Features (/features)
│   ├── Analytics (/features/analytics)
│   ├── Automation (/features/automation)
│   └── Integrations (/features/integrations)
├── Pricing (/pricing)
├── Blog (/blog)
│   ├── [Category: SEO] (/blog/category/seo)
│   └── [Category: CRO] (/blog/category/cro)
├── Resources (/resources)
│   ├── Case Studies (/resources/case-studies)
│   └── Templates (/resources/templates)
├── Docs (/docs)
│   ├── Getting Started (/docs/getting-started)
│   └── API Reference (/docs/api)
├── About (/about)
│   └── Careers (/about/careers)
└── Contact (/contact)

When to use ASCII vs Mermaid:

  • ASCII: quick hierarchy drafts, text-only contexts, simple structures
  • Mermaid: visual presentations, complex relationships, showing nav zones or linking patterns

Navigation Design

Navigation Types

Nav Type Purpose Placement
Header nav Primary navigation, always visible Top of every page
Dropdown menus Organize sub-pages under parent Expands from header items
Footer nav Secondary links, legal, sitemap Bottom of every page
Sidebar nav Section navigation (docs, blog) Left side within a section
Breadcrumbs Show current location in hierarchy Below header, above content
Contextual links Related content, next steps Within page content

Header Navigation Rules

  • 4-7 items max in the primary nav (more causes decision paralysis)
  • CTA button goes rightmost (e.g., "Start Free Trial," "Get Started")
  • Logo links to homepage (left side)
  • Order by priority: most important/visited pages first
  • If you have a mega menu, limit to 3-4 columns

Footer Organization

Group footer links into columns:

  • Product: Features, Pricing, Integrations, Changelog
  • Resources: Blog, Case Studies, Templates, Docs
  • Company: About, Careers, Contact, Press
  • Legal: Privacy, Terms, Security

Breadcrumb Format

Home > Features > Analytics
Home > Blog > SEO Category > Post Title

Breadcrumbs should mirror the URL hierarchy. Every breadcrumb segment should be a clickable link except the current page.

For detailed navigation patterns: See references/navigation-patterns.md


URL Structure

Design Principles

  1. Readable by humans/features/analytics not /f/a123
  2. Hyphens, not underscores/blog/seo-guide not /blog/seo_guide
  3. Reflect the hierarchy — URL path should match site structure
  4. Consistent trailing slash policy — pick one (with or without) and enforce it
  5. Lowercase always/About should redirect to /about
  6. Short but descriptive/blog/how-to-improve-landing-page-conversion-rates is too long; /blog/landing-page-conversions is better

URL Patterns by Page Type

Page Type Pattern Example
Homepage / example.com
Feature page /features/{name} /features/analytics
Pricing /pricing /pricing
Blog post /blog/{slug} /blog/seo-guide
Blog category /blog/category/{slug} /blog/category/seo
Case study /customers/{slug} /customers/acme-corp
Documentation /docs/{section}/{page} /docs/api/authentication
Legal /{page} /privacy, /terms
Landing page /{slug} or /lp/{slug} /free-trial, /lp/webinar
Comparison /compare/{competitor} or /vs/{competitor} /compare/competitor-name
Integration /integrations/{name} /integrations/slack
Template /templates/{slug} /templates/marketing-plan

Common Mistakes

  • Dates in blog URLs/blog/2024/01/15/post-title adds no value and makes URLs long. Use /blog/post-title.
  • Over-nesting/products/category/subcategory/item/detail is too deep. Flatten where possible.
  • Changing URLs without redirects — Every old URL needs a 301 redirect to its new URL. Without them, you lose backlink equity and create broken pages for anyone with the old URL bookmarked or linked.
  • IDs in URLs/product/12345 is not human-readable. Use slugs.
  • Query parameters for content/blog?id=123 should be /blog/post-title.
  • Inconsistent patterns — Don't mix /features/analytics and /product/automation. Pick one parent.

Breadcrumb-URL Alignment

The breadcrumb trail should mirror the URL path:

URL Breadcrumb
/features/analytics Home > Features > Analytics
/blog/seo-guide Home > Blog > SEO Guide
/docs/api/auth Home > Docs > API > Authentication

Visual Sitemap Output (Mermaid)

Use Mermaid graph TD for visual sitemaps. This makes hierarchy relationships clear and can annotate navigation zones.

Basic Hierarchy

graph TD
    HOME[Homepage] --> FEAT[Features]
    HOME --> PRICE[Pricing]
    HOME --> BLOG[Blog]
    HOME --> ABOUT[About]

    FEAT --> F1[Analytics]
    FEAT --> F2[Automation]
    FEAT --> F3[Integrations]

    BLOG --> B1[Post 1]
    BLOG --> B2[Post 2]

With Navigation Zones

graph TD
    subgraph Header Nav
        HOME[Homepage]
        FEAT[Features]
        PRICE[Pricing]
        BLOG[Blog]
        CTA[Get Started]
    end

    subgraph Footer Nav
        ABOUT[About]
        CAREERS[Careers]
        CONTACT[Contact]
        PRIVACY[Privacy]
    end

    HOME --> FEAT
    HOME --> PRICE
    HOME --> BLOG
    HOME --> ABOUT

    FEAT --> F1[Analytics]
    FEAT --> F2[Automation]

For more Mermaid templates: See references/mermaid-templates.md


Internal Linking Strategy

Link Types

Type Purpose Example
Navigational Move between sections Header, footer, sidebar links
Contextual Related content within text "Learn more about analytics"
Hub-and-spoke Connect cluster content to hub Blog posts linking to pillar page
Cross-section Connect related pages across sections Feature page linking to related case study

Internal Linking Rules

  1. No orphan pages — every page must have at least one internal link pointing to it
  2. Descriptive anchor text — "our analytics features" not "click here"
  3. 5-10 internal links per 1000 words of content (approximate guideline)
  4. Link to important pages more often — homepage, key feature pages, pricing
  5. Use breadcrumbs — free internal links on every page
  6. Related content sections — "Related Posts" or "You might also like" at page bottom

Hub-and-Spoke Model

For content-heavy sites, organize around hub pages:

Hub: /blog/seo-guide (comprehensive overview)
├── Spoke: /blog/keyword-research (links back to hub)
├── Spoke: /blog/on-page-seo (links back to hub)
├── Spoke: /blog/technical-seo (links back to hub)
└── Spoke: /blog/link-building (links back to hub)

Each spoke links back to the hub. The hub links to all spokes. Spokes link to each other where relevant.

Link Audit Checklist

  • Every page has at least one inbound internal link
  • No broken internal links (404s)
  • Anchor text is descriptive (not "click here" or "read more")
  • Important pages have the most inbound internal links
  • Breadcrumbs are implemented on all pages
  • Related content links exist on blog posts
  • Cross-section links connect features to case studies, blog to product pages

Output Format

When creating a site architecture plan, provide these deliverables:

1. Page Hierarchy (ASCII Tree)

Full site structure with URLs at each node. Use the ASCII tree format from the Page Hierarchy Design section.

2. Visual Sitemap (Mermaid)

Mermaid diagram showing page relationships and navigation zones. Use graph TD with subgraphs for nav zones where helpful.

3. URL Map Table

Page URL Parent Nav Location Priority
Homepage / Header High
Features /features Homepage Header High
Analytics /features/analytics Features Header dropdown Medium
Pricing /pricing Homepage Header High
Blog /blog Homepage Header Medium

4. Navigation Spec

  • Header nav items (ordered, with CTA)
  • Footer sections and links
  • Sidebar nav (if applicable)
  • Breadcrumb implementation notes

5. Internal Linking Plan

  • Hub pages and their spokes
  • Cross-section link opportunities
  • Orphan page audit (if restructuring)
  • Recommended links per key page

Task-Specific Questions

  1. Is this a new site or are you restructuring an existing one?
  2. What type of site is it? (SaaS, content, e-commerce, docs, hybrid, small business)
  3. How many pages exist or are planned?
  4. What are the 5 most important pages on the site?
  5. Are there existing URLs that need to be preserved or redirected?
  6. Who are the primary audiences, and what are they trying to accomplish on the site?

Related Skills

  • content-strategy: For planning what content to create and topic clusters
  • programmatic-seo: For building SEO pages at scale with templates and data
  • seo-audit: For technical SEO, on-page optimization, and indexation issues
  • page-cro: For optimizing individual pages for conversion
  • schema-markup: For implementing breadcrumb and site navigation structured data
  • competitor-alternatives: For comparison page frameworks and URL patterns
how to use site-architecture

How to use site-architecture on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add site-architecture
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill site-architecture

The skills CLI fetches site-architecture from GitHub repository coreyhaines31/marketingskills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/site-architecture

Reload or restart Cursor to activate site-architecture. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /site-architecture) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.529 reviews
  • Charlotte Gupta· Dec 12, 2024

    site-architecture reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • James Nasser· Dec 12, 2024

    site-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend site-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in site-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Charlotte Agarwal· Nov 23, 2024

    Registry listing for site-architecture matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Aarav Diallo· Nov 3, 2024

    site-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Zara Okafor· Nov 3, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: site-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Diego Farah· Oct 22, 2024

    Useful defaults in site-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Arjun Liu· Oct 22, 2024

    We added site-architecture from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Oct 14, 2024

    site-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 29

1 / 3