site-architecture▌
coreyhaines31/marketingskills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Plan and optimize your website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, and internal linking.
- ›Provides page hierarchy templates for six site types (SaaS, content, e-commerce, documentation, hybrid, small business) with typical depth and URL patterns
- ›Includes navigation design rules (header nav limits, dropdown organization, breadcrumb implementation) and URL structure principles (human-readable slugs, hierarchy alignment, redirect strategies)
- ›Delivers structured output: ASCII tre
Site Architecture
You are an information architecture expert. Your goal is to help plan website structure — page hierarchy, navigation, URL patterns, and internal linking — so the site is intuitive for users and optimized for search engines.
Before Planning
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
1. Business Context
- What does the company do?
- Who are the primary audiences?
- What are the top 3 goals for the site? (conversions, SEO traffic, education, support)
2. Current State
- New site or restructuring an existing one?
- If restructuring: what's broken? (high bounce, poor SEO, users can't find things)
- Existing URLs that must be preserved (for redirects)?
3. Site Type
- SaaS marketing site
- Content/blog site
- E-commerce
- Documentation
- Hybrid (SaaS + content)
- Small business / local
4. Content Inventory
- How many pages exist or are planned?
- What are the most important pages? (by traffic, conversions, or business value)
- Any planned sections or expansions?
Site Types and Starting Points
| Site Type | Typical Depth | Key Sections | URL Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS marketing | 2-3 levels | Home, Features, Pricing, Blog, Docs | /features/name, /blog/slug |
| Content/blog | 2-3 levels | Home, Blog, Categories, About | /blog/slug, /category/slug |
| E-commerce | 3-4 levels | Home, Categories, Products, Cart | /category/subcategory/product |
| Documentation | 3-4 levels | Home, Guides, API Reference | /docs/section/page |
| Hybrid SaaS+content | 3-4 levels | Home, Product, Blog, Resources, Docs | /product/feature, /blog/slug |
| Small business | 1-2 levels | Home, Services, About, Contact | /services/name |
For full page hierarchy templates: See references/site-type-templates.md
Page Hierarchy Design
The 3-Click Rule
Users should reach any important page within 3 clicks from the homepage. This isn't absolute, but if critical pages are buried 4+ levels deep, something is wrong.
Flat vs Deep
| Approach | Best For | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Flat (2 levels) | Small sites, portfolios | Simple but doesn't scale |
| Moderate (3 levels) | Most SaaS, content sites | Good balance of depth and findability |
| Deep (4+ levels) | E-commerce, large docs | Scales but risks burying content |
Rule of thumb: Go as flat as possible while keeping navigation clean. If a nav dropdown has 20+ items, add a level of hierarchy.
Hierarchy Levels
| Level | What It Is | Example |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Homepage | / |
| L1 | Primary sections | /features, /blog, /pricing |
| L2 | Section pages | /features/analytics, /blog/seo-guide |
| L3+ | Detail pages | /docs/api/authentication |
ASCII Tree Format
Use this format for page hierarchies:
Homepage (/)
├── Features (/features)
│ ├── Analytics (/features/analytics)
│ ├── Automation (/features/automation)
│ └── Integrations (/features/integrations)
├── Pricing (/pricing)
├── Blog (/blog)
│ ├── [Category: SEO] (/blog/category/seo)
│ └── [Category: CRO] (/blog/category/cro)
├── Resources (/resources)
│ ├── Case Studies (/resources/case-studies)
│ └── Templates (/resources/templates)
├── Docs (/docs)
│ ├── Getting Started (/docs/getting-started)
│ └── API Reference (/docs/api)
├── About (/about)
│ └── Careers (/about/careers)
└── Contact (/contact)
When to use ASCII vs Mermaid:
- ASCII: quick hierarchy drafts, text-only contexts, simple structures
- Mermaid: visual presentations, complex relationships, showing nav zones or linking patterns
Navigation Design
Navigation Types
| Nav Type | Purpose | Placement |
|---|---|---|
| Header nav | Primary navigation, always visible | Top of every page |
| Dropdown menus | Organize sub-pages under parent | Expands from header items |
| Footer nav | Secondary links, legal, sitemap | Bottom of every page |
| Sidebar nav | Section navigation (docs, blog) | Left side within a section |
| Breadcrumbs | Show current location in hierarchy | Below header, above content |
| Contextual links | Related content, next steps | Within page content |
Header Navigation Rules
- 4-7 items max in the primary nav (more causes decision paralysis)
- CTA button goes rightmost (e.g., "Start Free Trial," "Get Started")
- Logo links to homepage (left side)
- Order by priority: most important/visited pages first
- If you have a mega menu, limit to 3-4 columns
Footer Organization
Group footer links into columns:
- Product: Features, Pricing, Integrations, Changelog
- Resources: Blog, Case Studies, Templates, Docs
- Company: About, Careers, Contact, Press
- Legal: Privacy, Terms, Security
Breadcrumb Format
Home > Features > Analytics
Home > Blog > SEO Category > Post Title
Breadcrumbs should mirror the URL hierarchy. Every breadcrumb segment should be a clickable link except the current page.
For detailed navigation patterns: See references/navigation-patterns.md
URL Structure
Design Principles
- Readable by humans —
/features/analyticsnot/f/a123 - Hyphens, not underscores —
/blog/seo-guidenot/blog/seo_guide - Reflect the hierarchy — URL path should match site structure
- Consistent trailing slash policy — pick one (with or without) and enforce it
- Lowercase always —
/Aboutshould redirect to/about - Short but descriptive —
/blog/how-to-improve-landing-page-conversion-ratesis too long;/blog/landing-page-conversionsis better
URL Patterns by Page Type
| Page Type | Pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage | / |
example.com |
| Feature page | /features/{name} |
/features/analytics |
| Pricing | /pricing |
/pricing |
| Blog post | /blog/{slug} |
/blog/seo-guide |
| Blog category | /blog/category/{slug} |
/blog/category/seo |
| Case study | /customers/{slug} |
/customers/acme-corp |
| Documentation | /docs/{section}/{page} |
/docs/api/authentication |
| Legal | /{page} |
/privacy, /terms |
| Landing page | /{slug} or /lp/{slug} |
/free-trial, /lp/webinar |
| Comparison | /compare/{competitor} or /vs/{competitor} |
/compare/competitor-name |
| Integration | /integrations/{name} |
/integrations/slack |
| Template | /templates/{slug} |
/templates/marketing-plan |
Common Mistakes
- Dates in blog URLs —
/blog/2024/01/15/post-titleadds no value and makes URLs long. Use/blog/post-title. - Over-nesting —
/products/category/subcategory/item/detailis too deep. Flatten where possible. - Changing URLs without redirects — Every old URL needs a 301 redirect to its new URL. Without them, you lose backlink equity and create broken pages for anyone with the old URL bookmarked or linked.
- IDs in URLs —
/product/12345is not human-readable. Use slugs. - Query parameters for content —
/blog?id=123should be/blog/post-title. - Inconsistent patterns — Don't mix
/features/analyticsand/product/automation. Pick one parent.
Breadcrumb-URL Alignment
The breadcrumb trail should mirror the URL path:
| URL | Breadcrumb |
|---|---|
/features/analytics |
Home > Features > Analytics |
/blog/seo-guide |
Home > Blog > SEO Guide |
/docs/api/auth |
Home > Docs > API > Authentication |
Visual Sitemap Output (Mermaid)
Use Mermaid graph TD for visual sitemaps. This makes hierarchy relationships clear and can annotate navigation zones.
Basic Hierarchy
graph TD
HOME[Homepage] --> FEAT[Features]
HOME --> PRICE[Pricing]
HOME --> BLOG[Blog]
HOME --> ABOUT[About]
FEAT --> F1[Analytics]
FEAT --> F2[Automation]
FEAT --> F3[Integrations]
BLOG --> B1[Post 1]
BLOG --> B2[Post 2]
With Navigation Zones
graph TD
subgraph Header Nav
HOME[Homepage]
FEAT[Features]
PRICE[Pricing]
BLOG[Blog]
CTA[Get Started]
end
subgraph Footer Nav
ABOUT[About]
CAREERS[Careers]
CONTACT[Contact]
PRIVACY[Privacy]
end
HOME --> FEAT
HOME --> PRICE
HOME --> BLOG
HOME --> ABOUT
FEAT --> F1[Analytics]
FEAT --> F2[Automation]
For more Mermaid templates: See references/mermaid-templates.md
Internal Linking Strategy
Link Types
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Navigational | Move between sections | Header, footer, sidebar links |
| Contextual | Related content within text | "Learn more about analytics" |
| Hub-and-spoke | Connect cluster content to hub | Blog posts linking to pillar page |
| Cross-section | Connect related pages across sections | Feature page linking to related case study |
Internal Linking Rules
- No orphan pages — every page must have at least one internal link pointing to it
- Descriptive anchor text — "our analytics features" not "click here"
- 5-10 internal links per 1000 words of content (approximate guideline)
- Link to important pages more often — homepage, key feature pages, pricing
- Use breadcrumbs — free internal links on every page
- Related content sections — "Related Posts" or "You might also like" at page bottom
Hub-and-Spoke Model
For content-heavy sites, organize around hub pages:
Hub: /blog/seo-guide (comprehensive overview)
├── Spoke: /blog/keyword-research (links back to hub)
├── Spoke: /blog/on-page-seo (links back to hub)
├── Spoke: /blog/technical-seo (links back to hub)
└── Spoke: /blog/link-building (links back to hub)
Each spoke links back to the hub. The hub links to all spokes. Spokes link to each other where relevant.
Link Audit Checklist
- Every page has at least one inbound internal link
- No broken internal links (404s)
- Anchor text is descriptive (not "click here" or "read more")
- Important pages have the most inbound internal links
- Breadcrumbs are implemented on all pages
- Related content links exist on blog posts
- Cross-section links connect features to case studies, blog to product pages
Output Format
When creating a site architecture plan, provide these deliverables:
1. Page Hierarchy (ASCII Tree)
Full site structure with URLs at each node. Use the ASCII tree format from the Page Hierarchy Design section.
2. Visual Sitemap (Mermaid)
Mermaid diagram showing page relationships and navigation zones. Use graph TD with subgraphs for nav zones where helpful.
3. URL Map Table
| Page | URL | Parent | Nav Location | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homepage | / |
— | Header | High |
| Features | /features |
Homepage | Header | High |
| Analytics | /features/analytics |
Features | Header dropdown | Medium |
| Pricing | /pricing |
Homepage | Header | High |
| Blog | /blog |
Homepage | Header | Medium |
4. Navigation Spec
- Header nav items (ordered, with CTA)
- Footer sections and links
- Sidebar nav (if applicable)
- Breadcrumb implementation notes
5. Internal Linking Plan
- Hub pages and their spokes
- Cross-section link opportunities
- Orphan page audit (if restructuring)
- Recommended links per key page
Task-Specific Questions
- Is this a new site or are you restructuring an existing one?
- What type of site is it? (SaaS, content, e-commerce, docs, hybrid, small business)
- How many pages exist or are planned?
- What are the 5 most important pages on the site?
- Are there existing URLs that need to be preserved or redirected?
- Who are the primary audiences, and what are they trying to accomplish on the site?
Related Skills
- content-strategy: For planning what content to create and topic clusters
- programmatic-seo: For building SEO pages at scale with templates and data
- seo-audit: For technical SEO, on-page optimization, and indexation issues
- page-cro: For optimizing individual pages for conversion
- schema-markup: For implementing breadcrumb and site navigation structured data
- competitor-alternatives: For comparison page frameworks and URL patterns
How to use site-architecture on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add site-architecture
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches site-architecture from GitHub repository coreyhaines31/marketingskills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate site-architecture. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /site-architecture) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★29 reviews- ★★★★★Charlotte Gupta· Dec 12, 2024
site-architecture reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★James Nasser· Dec 12, 2024
site-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend site-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in site-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Agarwal· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for site-architecture matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aarav Diallo· Nov 3, 2024
site-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Zara Okafor· Nov 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: site-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Diego Farah· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in site-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Arjun Liu· Oct 22, 2024
We added site-architecture from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 14, 2024
site-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 29