langsmith-fetch

composiohq/awesome-claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/composiohq/awesome-claude-skills --skill langsmith-fetch
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Fetch and analyze LangChain and LangGraph execution traces from LangSmith Studio for agent debugging.

  • Retrieves recent traces and performs root-cause analysis on agent failures, tool calls, memory operations, and performance issues
  • Supports multiple output formats (pretty, JSON, raw) and time-based filtering to isolate specific execution windows
  • Includes four core workflows: quick debug of recent activity, deep-dive analysis of specific traces, session export with metadata, and error
skill.md

LangSmith Fetch - Agent Debugging Skill

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces directly from LangSmith Studio in your terminal.

When to Use This Skill

Automatically activate when user mentions:

  • 🐛 "Debug my agent" or "What went wrong?"
  • 🔍 "Show me recent traces" or "What happened?"
  • ❌ "Check for errors" or "Why did it fail?"
  • 💾 "Analyze memory operations" or "Check LTM"
  • 📊 "Review agent performance" or "Check token usage"
  • 🔧 "What tools were called?" or "Show execution flow"

Prerequisites

1. Install langsmith-fetch

pip install langsmith-fetch

2. Set Environment Variables

export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_langsmith_api_key"
export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project_name"

Verify setup:

echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY
echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Quick Debug Recent Activity

When user asks: "What just happened?" or "Debug my agent"

Execute:

langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty

Analyze and report:

  1. ✅ Number of traces found
  2. ⚠️ Any errors or failures
  3. 🛠️ Tools that were called
  4. ⏱️ Execution times
  5. 💰 Token usage

Example response format:

Found 3 traces in the last 5 minutes:

Trace 1: ✅ Success
- Agent: memento
- Tools: recall_memories, create_entities
- Duration: 2.3s
- Tokens: 1,245

Trace 2: ❌ Error
- Agent: cypher
- Error: "Neo4j connection timeout"
- Duration: 15.1s
- Failed at: search_nodes tool

Trace 3: ✅ Success
- Agent: memento
- Tools: store_memory
- Duration: 1.8s
- Tokens: 892

💡 Issue found: Trace 2 failed due to Neo4j timeout. Recommend checking database connection.

Workflow 2: Deep Dive Specific Trace

When user provides: Trace ID or says "investigate that error"

Execute:

langsmith-fetch trace <trace-id> --format json

Analyze JSON and report:

  1. 🎯 What the agent was trying to do
  2. 🛠️ Which tools were called (in order)
  3. ✅ Tool results (success/failure)
  4. ❌ Error messages (if any)
  5. 💡 Root cause analysis
  6. 🔧 Suggested fix

Example response format:

Deep Dive Analysis - Trace abc123

Goal: User asked "Find all projects in Neo4j"

Execution Flow:
1. ✅ search_nodes(query: "projects")
   → Found 24 nodes

2. ❌ get_node_details(node_id: "proj_123")
   → Error: "Node not found"
   → This is the failure point

3. ⏹️ Execution stopped

Root Cause:
The search_nodes tool returned node IDs that no longer exist in the database,
possibly due to recent deletions.

Suggested Fix:
1. Add error handling in get_node_details tool
2. Filter deleted nodes in search results
3. Update cache invalidation strategy

Token Usage: 1,842 tokens ($0.0276)
Execution Time: 8.7 seconds

Workflow 3: Export Debug Session

When user says: "Save this session" or "Export traces"

Execute:

# Create session folder with timestamp
SESSION_DIR="langsmith-debug/session-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$SESSION_DIR"

# Export traces
langsmith-fetch traces "$SESSION_DIR/traces" --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --include-metadata

# Export threads (conversations)
langsmith-fetch threads "$SESSION_DIR/threads" --limit 20

Report:

✅ Session exported successfully!

Location: langsmith-debug/session-20251224-143022/
- Traces: 42 files
- Threads: 8 files

You can now:
1. Review individual trace files
2. Share folder with team
3. Analyze with external tools
4. Archive for future reference

Session size: 2.3 MB

Workflow 4: Error Detection

When user asks: "Show me errors" or "What's failing?"

Execute:

# Fetch recent traces
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --format json > recent-traces.json

# Search for errors
grep -i "error\|failed\|exception" recent-traces.json

Analyze and report:

  1. 📊 Total errors found
  2. ❌ Error types and frequency
  3. 🕐 When errors occurred
  4. 🎯 Which agents/tools failed
  5. 💡 Common patterns

Example response format:

Error Analysis - Last 30 Minutes

Total Traces: 50
Failed Traces: 7 (14% failure rate)

Error Breakdown:
1. Neo4j Connection Timeout (4 occurrences)
   - Agent: cypher
   - Tool: search_nodes
   - First occurred: 14:32
   - Last occurred: 14:45
   - Pattern: Happens during peak load

2. Memory Store Failed (2 occurrences)
   - Agent: memento
   - Tool: store_memory
   - Error: "Pinecone rate limit exceeded"
   - Occurred: 14:38, 14:41

3. Tool Not Found (1 occurrence)
   - Agent: sqlcrm
   - Attempted tool: "export_report" (doesn't exist)
   - Occurred: 14:35

💡 Recommendations:
1. Add retry logic for Neo4j timeouts
2. Implement rate limiting for Pinecone
3. Fix sqlcrm tool configuration

Common Use Cases

Use Case 1: "Agent Not Responding"

User says: "My agent isn't doing anything"

Steps:

  1. Check if traces exist:

    langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5
    
  2. If NO traces found:

    • Tracing might be disabled
    • Check: LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true in environment
    • Check: LANGCHAIN_API_KEY is set
    • Verify agent actually ran
  3. If traces found:

    • Review for errors
    • Check execution time (hanging?)
    • Verify tool calls completed

Use Case 2: "Wrong Tool Called"

User says: "Why did it use the wrong tool?"

Steps:

  1. Get the specific trace
  2. Review available tools at execution time
  3. Check agent's reasoning for tool selection
  4. Examine tool descriptions/instructions
  5. Suggest prompt or tool config improvements

Use Case 3: "Memory Not Working"

User says: "Agent doesn't remember things"

Steps:

  1. Search for memory operations:

    langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 10 --limit 20 --format raw | grep -i "memory\|recall\|store"
    
  2. Check:

    • Were memory tools called?
    • Did recall return results?
    • Were memories actually stored?
    • Are retrieved memories being used?

Use Case 4: "Performance Issues"

User says: "Agent is too slow"

Steps:

  1. Export with metadata:

    langsmith-fetch traces ./perf-analysis --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --include-metadata
    
  2. Analyze:

    • Execution time per trace
    • Tool call latencies
    • Token usage (context size)
    • Number of iterations
    • Slowest operations
  3. Identify bottlenecks and suggest optimizations


Output Format Guide

Pretty Format (Default)

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format pretty

Use for: Quick visual inspection, showing to users

JSON Format

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format json

Use for: Detailed analysis, syntax-highlighted review

Raw Format

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format raw

Use for: Piping to other commands, automation


Advanced Features

Time-Based Filtering

# After specific timestamp
langsmith-fetch traces --after "2025-12-24T13:00:00Z" --limit 20

# Last N minutes (most common)
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 60 --limit 100

Include Metadata

# Get extra context
langsmith-fetch traces --limit 10 --include-metadata

# Metadata includes: agent type, model, tags, environment

Concurrent Fetching (Faster)

# Speed up large exports
langsmith-fetch traces ./output --limit 100 --concurrent 10

Troubleshooting

"No traces found matching criteria"

Possible causes:

  1. No agent activity in the timeframe
  2. Tracing is disabled
  3. Wrong project name
  4. API key issues

Solutions:

# 1. Try longer timeframe
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 1440 --limit 50

# 2. Check environment
echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY
echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT

# 3. Try fetching threads instead
langsmith-fetch threads --limit 10

# 4. Verify tracing is enabled in your code
# Check for: LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true

"Project not found"

Solution:

# View current config
langsmith-fetch config show

# Set correct project
export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="correct-project-name"

# Or configure permanently
langsmith-fetch config set project "your-project-name"

Environment variables not persisting

Solution:

# Add to shell config file (~/.bashrc or ~/.zshrc)
echo 'export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_key"' >> ~/.bashrc
echo 'export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project"' >> ~/.bashrc

# Reload shell config
source ~/.bashrc

Best Practices

1. Regular Health Checks

# Quick check after making changes
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5

2. Organized Storage

langsmith-debug/
├── sessions/
│   ├── 2025-12-24/
│   └── 2025-12-25/
├── error-cases/
└── performance-tests/

3. Document Findings

When you find bugs:

  1. Export the problematic trace
  2. Save to error-cases/ folder
  3. Note what went wrong in a README
  4. Share trace ID with team

4. Integration with Development

# Before committing code
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 10 --limit 5

# If errors found
langsmith-fetch trace <error-id> --format json > pre-commit-error.json

Quick Reference

# Most common commands

# Quick debug
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty

# Specific trace
langsmith-fetch trace <trace-id> --format pretty

# Export session
langsmith-fetch traces ./debug-session --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50
how to use langsmith-fetch

How to use langsmith-fetch on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add langsmith-fetch
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/composiohq/awesome-claude-skills --skill langsmith-fetch

The skills CLI fetches langsmith-fetch from GitHub repository composiohq/awesome-claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/langsmith-fetch

Reload or restart Cursor to activate langsmith-fetch. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /langsmith-fetch) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.665 reviews
  • Jin Okafor· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: langsmith-fetch is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Aditi Khanna· Dec 24, 2024

    We added langsmith-fetch from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Kabir Rao· Dec 20, 2024

    langsmith-fetch is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kabir Iyer· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for langsmith-fetch matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024

    We added langsmith-fetch from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024

    langsmith-fetch fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Aditi Malhotra· Nov 15, 2024

    langsmith-fetch has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Dev Sanchez· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for langsmith-fetch matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Aditi Chen· Nov 15, 2024

    langsmith-fetch fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Charlotte Garcia· Nov 11, 2024

    langsmith-fetch reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 65

1 / 7