Use this skill when:
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionaxiom-swiftui-architectureExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches axiom-swiftui-architecture from charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate axiom-swiftui-architecture. Access via /axiom-swiftui-architecture in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
767
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
767
stars
Use this skill when:
| What You Might Ask | Why This Skill Helps |
|---|---|
| "There's quite a bit of code in my model view files about logic things. How do I extract it?" | Provides refactoring workflow with decision trees for where logic belongs |
| "Should I use MVVM, TCA, or Apple's vanilla patterns?" | Decision criteria based on app complexity, team size, testability needs |
| "How do I make my SwiftUI code testable?" | Shows separation patterns that enable testing without SwiftUI imports |
| "Where should formatters and calculations go?" | Anti-patterns section prevents logic in view bodies |
| "Which property wrapper do I use?" | Decision tree for @State, @Environment, @Bindable, or plain properties |
What's driving your architecture choice?
│
├─ Starting fresh, small/medium app, want Apple's patterns?
│ └─ Use Apple's Native Patterns (Part 1)
│ - @Observable models for business logic
│ - State-as-Bridge for async boundaries
│ - Property wrapper decision tree
│
├─ Familiar with MVVM from UIKit?
│ └─ Use MVVM Pattern (Part 2)
│ - ViewModels as presentation adapters
│ - Clear View/ViewModel/Model separation
│ - Works well with @Observable
│
├─ Complex app, need rigorous testability, team consistency?
│ └─ Consider TCA (Part 3)
│ - State/Action/Reducer/Store architecture
│ - Excellent testing story
│ - Learning curve + boilerplate trade-off
│
└─ Complex navigation, deep linking, multiple entry points?
└─ Add Coordinator Pattern (Part 4)
- Can combine with any of the above
- Extracts navigation logic from views
- NavigationPath + Coordinator objects
"A data model provides separation between the data and the views that interact with the data. This separation promotes modularity, improves testability, and helps make it easier to reason about how the app works." — Apple Developer Documentation
Apple's modern SwiftUI patterns (WWDC 2023-2025) center on:
Async functions create suspension points that can break animations:
// ❌ Problematic: Animation might miss frame deadline
struct ColorExtractorView: View {
@State private var isLoading = false
var body: some View {
Button("Extract Colors") {
Task {
isLoading = true // Synchronous ✅
await extractColors() // ⚠️ Suspension point!
isLoading = false // ❌ Might happen too late
}
}
.scaleEffect(isLoading ? 1.5 : 1.0) // ⚠️ Animation timing uncertain
}
}
"Find the boundaries between UI code that requires time-sensitive changes, and long-running async logic."
// ✅ Correct: State bridges UI and async code
@Observable
class ColorExtractor {
var isLoading = false
var colors: [Color] = []
func extract(from image: UIImage) async {
// This method is async and can live in the model
let extracted = await heavyComputation(image)
// Synchronous mutation for UI update
self.colors = extracted
}
}
struct ColorExtractorView: View {
let extractor: ColorExtractor
var body: some View {
Button("Extract Colors") {
// Synchronous state change for animation
withAnimation {
extractor.isLoading = true
}
// Launch async work
Task {
await extractor.extract(from: currentImage)
// Synchronous state change for animation
withAnimation {
extractor.isLoading = false
}
}
}
.scaleEffect(extractor.isLoading ? 1.5 : 1.0)
}
}
Benefits:
There are only 3 questions to answer:
Which property wrapper should I use?
│
├─ Does this model need to be STATE OF THE VIEW ITSELF?
│ └─ YES → Use @State
│ Examples: Form inputs, local toggles, sheet presentations
│ Lifetime: Managed by the view's lifetime
│
├─ Does this model need to be part of the GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT?
│ └─ YES → Use @Environment
│ Examples: User account, app settings, dependency injection
│ Lifetime: Lives at app/scene level
│
├─ Does this model JUST NEED BINDINGS?
│ └─ YES → Use @Bindable
│ Examples: Editing a model passed from parent
│ Lightweight: Only enables $ syntax for bindings
│
└─ NONE OF THE ABOVE?
└─ Use as plain property
Examples: Immutable data, parent-owned models
No wrapper needed: @Observable handles observation
// ✅ @State — View owns the model
struct DonutEditor: View {
@State private var donutToAdd = Donut() // View's own state
var body: some View {
TextField("Name", text: $donutToAdd.name)
}
}
// ✅ @Environment — App-wide model
struct MenuView: View {
@Environment(Account.self) private var account // Global
var body: some View {
Text("Welcome, \(account.userName)")
}
}
// ✅ @Bindable — Need bindings to parent-owned model
struct DonutRow: View {
@Bindable var donut: Donut // Parent owns it
var body: some View {
TextField("Name", text: $donut.name) // Need binding
}
}
// ✅ Plain property — Just reading
struct DonutRow: View {
let donut: Donut // Parent owns, no binding needed
var body: some View {
Text(donut.name) // Just reading
}
}
Use @Observable for business logic that needs to trigger UI updates:
// ✅ Domain model with business logic
@Observable
class FoodTruckModel {
var orders: [Order] = []
var donuts = Donut.all
var orderCount: Int {
orders.count // Computed properties work automatically
}
func addDonut() {
donuts.append(Donut())
}
}
// ✅ View automatically tracks accessed properties
struct DonutMenu: View {
let model: FoodTruckModel // No wrapper needed!
var body: somePrerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
anthropics/claude-code
mblode/agent-skills
github/awesome-copilot
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
leonxlnx/taste-skill
erichowens/some_claude_skills
axiom-swiftui-architecture is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
axiom-swiftui-architecture fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-swiftui-architecture is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in axiom-swiftui-architecture — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for axiom-swiftui-architecture matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend axiom-swiftui-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
axiom-swiftui-architecture reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend axiom-swiftui-architecture for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
axiom-swiftui-architecture has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
axiom-swiftui-architecture fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 38