axiom-foundation-models▌
charleswiltgen/axiom · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Use when:
Foundation Models — On-Device AI for Apple Platforms
When to Use This Skill
Use when:
- Implementing on-device AI features with Foundation Models
- Adding text summarization, classification, or extraction capabilities
- Creating structured output from LLM responses
- Building tool-calling patterns for external data integration
- Streaming generated content for better UX
- Debugging Foundation Models issues (context overflow, slow generation, wrong output)
- Deciding between Foundation Models vs server LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.)
Related Skills
- Use
axiom-foundation-models-diagfor systematic troubleshooting (context exceeded, guardrail violations, availability problems) - Use
axiom-foundation-models-reffor complete API reference with all WWDC code examples
Red Flags — Anti-Patterns That Will Fail
❌ Using for World Knowledge
Why it fails: The on-device model is 3 billion parameters, optimized for summarization, extraction, classification — NOT world knowledge or complex reasoning.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Asking for world knowledge
let session = LanguageModelSession()
let response = try await session.respond(to: "What's the capital of France?")
Why: Model will hallucinate or give low-quality answers. It's trained for content generation, not encyclopedic knowledge.
Correct approach: Use server LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude) for world knowledge, or provide factual data through Tool calling.
❌ Blocking Main Thread
Why it fails: session.respond() is async but if called synchronously on main thread, freezes UI for seconds.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Blocking main thread
Button("Generate") {
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt) // UI frozen!
}
Why: Generation takes 1-5 seconds. User sees frozen app, bad reviews follow.
Correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD - Async on background
Button("Generate") {
Task {
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt)
// Update UI with response
}
}
❌ Manual JSON Parsing
Why it fails: Prompting for JSON and parsing with JSONDecoder leads to hallucinated keys, invalid JSON, no type safety.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Manual JSON parsing
let prompt = "Generate a person with name and age as JSON"
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt)
let data = response.content.data(using: .utf8)!
let person = try JSONDecoder().decode(Person.self, from: data) // CRASHES!
Why: Model might output {firstName: "John"} when you expect {name: "John"}. Or invalid JSON entirely.
Correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD - @Generable guarantees structure
@Generable
struct Person {
let name: String
let age: Int
}
let response = try await session.respond(
to: "Generate a person",
generating: Person.self
)
// response.content is type-safe Person instance
❌ Ignoring Availability Check
Why it fails: Foundation Models only runs on Apple Intelligence devices in supported regions. App crashes or shows errors without check.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - No availability check
let session = LanguageModelSession() // Might fail!
Correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD - Check first
switch SystemLanguageModel.default.availability {
case .available:
let session = LanguageModelSession()
// proceed
case .unavailable(let reason):
// Show graceful UI: "AI features require Apple Intelligence"
}
❌ Single Huge Prompt
Why it fails: 4096 token context window (input + output). One massive prompt hits limit, gives poor results.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Everything in one prompt
let prompt = """
Generate a 7-day itinerary for Tokyo including hotels, restaurants,
activities for each day, transportation details, budget breakdown...
"""
// Exceeds context, poor quality
Correct approach: Break into smaller tasks, use tools for external data, multi-turn conversation.
❌ Not Handling Generation Errors
Why it fails: Three errors MUST be handled or your app will crash in production.
do {
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt)
} catch LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.exceededContextWindowSize {
// Multi-turn transcript grew beyond 4096 tokens
// → Condense transcript and create new session (see Pattern 5)
} catch LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.guardrailViolation {
// Content policy triggered
// → Show graceful message: "I can't help with that request"
} catch LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.unsupportedLanguageOrLocale {
// User input in unsupported language
// → Show disclaimer, check SystemLanguageModel.default.supportedLanguages
}
Mandatory First Steps
Before writing any Foundation Models code, complete these steps:
1. Check Availability
See "Ignoring Availability Check" in Red Flags above for the required pattern. Foundation Models requires Apple Intelligence-enabled device, supported region, and user opt-in.
2. Identify Use Case
Ask yourself: What is my primary goal?
| Use Case | Foundation Models? | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Summarization | ✅ YES | |
| Extraction (key info from text) | ✅ YES | |
| Classification (categorize content) | ✅ YES | |
| Content tagging | ✅ YES (built-in adapter!) | |
| World knowledge | ❌ NO | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini |
| Complex reasoning | ❌ NO | Server LLMs |
| Mathematical computation | ❌ NO | Calculator, symbolic math |
Critical: If your use case requires world knowledge or advanced reasoning, stop. Foundation Models is the wrong tool.
3. Design @Generable Schema
If you need structured output (not just plain text):
Bad approach: Prompt for "JSON" and parse manually Good approach: Define @Generable type
@Generable
struct SearchSuggestions {
@Guide(description: "Suggested search terms", .count(4))
var searchTerms: [String]
}
Why: Constrained decoding guarantees structure. No parsing errors, no hallucinated keys.
4. Consider Tools for External Data
If your feature needs external information:
- Weather → WeatherKit tool
- Locations → MapKit tool
- Contacts → Contacts API tool
- Calendar → EventKit tool
Don't try to get this information from the model (it will hallucinate). Do define Tool protocol implementations.
5. Plan Streaming for Long Generations
If generation takes >1 second, use streaming:
let stream = session.streamResponse(
to: prompt,
generating: Itinerary.self
)
for try await partial in stream {
// Update UI incrementally
self.itinerary = partial
}
Why: Users see progress immediately, perceived latency drops dramatically.
Decision Tree
Need on-device AI?
│
├─ World knowledge/reasoning?
│ └─ ❌ NOT Foundation Models
│ → Use ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.
│ → Reason: 3B parameter model, not trained for encyclopedic knowledge
│
├─ Summarization?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 1 (Basic Session)
│ → Example: Summarize article, condense email
│ → Time: 10-15 minutes
│
├─ Structured extraction?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 2 (@Generable)
│ → Example: Extract name, date, amount from invoice
│ → Time: 15-20 minutes
│
├─ Content tagging?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 3 (contentTagging use case)
│ → Example: Tag article topics, extract entities
│ → Time: 10 minutes
│
├─ Need external data?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 4 (Tool calling)
│ → Example: Fetch weather, query contacts, get locations
│ → Time: 20-30 minutes
│
├─ Long generation?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 5 (Streaming)
│ → Example: Generate itinerary, create story
│ → Time: 15-20 minutes
│
└─ Dynamic schemas (runtime-defined structure)?
└─ ✅ YES → Pattern 6 (DynamicGenerationSchema)
→ Example: Level creator, user-defined forms
→ Time: 30-40 minutes
Pattern 1: Basic Session
Use when: Simple text generation, summarization, or content analysis.
Core Concepts
LanguageModelSession:
- Stateful — retains transcript of all interactions
- Instructions vs prompts:
- Instructions (from developer): Define model's role, static guidance
- Prompts (from user): Dynamic input for generation
- Model trained to obey instructions over prompts (security feature)
Implementation
import FoundationModels
func respond(userInput: String) async throws How to use axiom-foundation-models on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add axiom-foundation-models
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches axiom-foundation-models from GitHub repository charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate axiom-foundation-models. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /axiom-foundation-models) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★48 reviews- ★★★★★Diego Agarwal· Dec 28, 2024
axiom-foundation-models reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Khanna· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend axiom-foundation-models for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 12, 2024
axiom-foundation-models is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ava Malhotra· Dec 8, 2024
axiom-foundation-models is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Omar Agarwal· Dec 4, 2024
We added axiom-foundation-models from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Anika Shah· Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-foundation-models is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★William Mensah· Nov 27, 2024
axiom-foundation-models fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Sophia Wang· Nov 23, 2024
axiom-foundation-models has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Omar Khanna· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in axiom-foundation-models — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 3, 2024
axiom-foundation-models fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 48