axiom-assume-isolated▌
charleswiltgen/axiom · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Synchronously access actor-isolated state when you know you're already on the correct isolation domain.
assumeIsolated — Synchronous Actor Access
Synchronously access actor-isolated state when you know you're already on the correct isolation domain.
When to Use
✅ Use when:
- Testing MainActor code synchronously (avoiding Task overhead)
- Legacy delegate callbacks documented to run on main thread
- Performance-critical code avoiding async hop overhead
- Protocol conformances where callbacks are guaranteed on specific actor
❌ Don't use when:
- Uncertain about current isolation (use
awaitinstead) - Already in async context (you have isolation)
- Cross-actor calls needed (use async)
- Callback origin is unknown or untrusted
API Reference
MainActor.assumeIsolated
static func assumeIsolated<T>(
_ operation: @MainActor () throws -> T,
file: StaticString = #fileID,
line: UInt = #line
) rethrows -> T where T: Sendable
Behavior: Executes synchronously. Crashes if not on MainActor's serial executor.
Custom Actor assumeIsolated
func assumeIsolated<T>(
_ operation: (isolated Self) throws -> T,
file: StaticString = #fileID,
line: UInt = #line
) rethrows -> T where T: Sendable
Task vs assumeIsolated
| Aspect | Task { @MainActor in } |
MainActor.assumeIsolated |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | Deferred (next run loop) | Synchronous (inline) |
| Async support | Yes (can await) | No (sync only) |
| Context | From any context | Must be sync function |
| Failure mode | Runs anyway | Crashes if wrong isolation |
| Use case | Start async work | Verify + access isolated state |
Patterns
Pattern 1: Testing MainActor Code
@Test func viewModelUpdates() {
MainActor.assumeIsolated {
let vm = ViewModel()
vm.update()
#expect(vm.state == .updated)
}
}
Pattern 2: Legacy Delegate Callbacks
From WWDC 2024-10169 — When documentation guarantees main thread delivery:
@MainActor
class LocationDelegate: NSObject, CLLocationManagerDelegate {
var location: CLLocation?
// CLLocationManager created on main thread delivers callbacks on main thread
nonisolated func locationManager(
_ manager: CLLocationManager,
didUpdateLocations locations: [CLLocation]
) {
MainActor.assumeIsolated {
self.location = locations.last
}
}
}
Pattern 3: @preconcurrency Shorthand
@preconcurrency is equivalent shorthand — wraps in assumeIsolated automatically:
// ❌ Manual approach (verbose)
extension MyClass: SomeDelegate {
nonisolated func callback() {
MainActor.assumeIsolated {
self.updateUI()
}
}
}
// ✅ Using @preconcurrency (equivalent, cleaner)
extension MyClass: @preconcurrency SomeDelegate {
func callback() {
self.updateUI() // Compiler wraps in assumeIsolated
}
}
When protocol adds isolation: @preconcurrency becomes unnecessary and compiler warns.
Pattern 4: Thread Check Before assumeIsolated
When caller context is unknown (e.g., library code):
func getView() -> UIView {
if Thread.isMainThread {
return createHostingViewOnMain()
} else {
return DispatchQueue.main.sync {
createHostingViewOnMain()
}
}
}
private func createHostingViewOnMain() -> UIView {
MainActor.assumeIsolated {
let hosting = UIHostingController(rootView: MyView())
return hosting.view
}
}
Pattern 5: Custom Actor Access
actor DataStore {
var cache: [String: Data] = [:]
nonisolated func synchronousRead(key: String) -> Data? {
// Only safe if called from DataStore's executor
assumeIsolated { isolated in
isolated.cache[key]
}
}
}
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Silencing Compiler Errors
// ❌ DANGEROUS: Using assumeIsolated to silence warnings
func unknownContext() {
MainActor.assumeIsolated {
updateUI() // Crashes if not actually on main actor!
}
}
// ✅ When uncertain, use proper async
func unknownContext() async {
await MainActor.run {
updateUI()
}
}
Mistake 2: Assuming GCD Main Queue == MainActor
They're usually the same, but not guaranteed. Check documentation or use async.
Mistake 3: Using in Async Context
// ❌ Unnecessary — you already have isolation
@MainActor
func updateState() async {
MainActor.assumeIsolated { // Pointless
self.state = .ready
}
}
// ✅ Direct access
@MainActor
func updateState() async {
self.state = .ready
}
When @preconcurrency Becomes Unnecessary
If the protocol later adds MainActor isolation:
// Library update:
@MainActor
protocol CaffeineThresholdDelegate: AnyObject {
func caffeineLevel(at level: Double)
}
// Your code — @preconcurrency now warns:
// "@preconcurrency attribute on conformance has no effect"
extension Recaffeinater: CaffeineThresholdDelegate {
func caffeineLevel(at level: Double) {
// Direct access, no wrapper needed
}
}
Crash Behavior
Per Apple documentation:
"If the current context is not running on the actor's serial executor... this method will crash with a fatal error."
Trapping is intentional: Better to crash than corrupt user data with a race condition.
Resources
WWDC: 2024-10169
Docs: /swift/mainactor/assumeisolated, /s
How to use axiom-assume-isolated on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add axiom-assume-isolated
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches axiom-assume-isolated from GitHub repository charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate axiom-assume-isolated. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /axiom-assume-isolated) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★50 reviews- ★★★★★Henry Lopez· Dec 28, 2024
axiom-assume-isolated reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Jin Sharma· Dec 24, 2024
axiom-assume-isolated has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Noah Liu· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend axiom-assume-isolated for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Aditi Chen· Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: axiom-assume-isolated is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Henry Haddad· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for axiom-assume-isolated matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aditi Lopez· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-assume-isolated is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sakura Abbas· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for axiom-assume-isolated matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Malhotra· Oct 10, 2024
Keeps context tight: axiom-assume-isolated is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Aditi Haddad· Oct 6, 2024
We added axiom-assume-isolated from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Olivia Mensah· Sep 21, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-assume-isolated is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 50