clean-ddd-hexagonal

ccheney/robust-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/ccheney/robust-skills --skill clean-ddd-hexagonal
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

$22

skill.md

Clean Architecture + DDD + Hexagonal

Backend architecture combining DDD tactical patterns, Clean Architecture dependency rules, and Hexagonal ports/adapters for maintainable, testable systems.

When to Use (and When NOT to)

Use When Skip When
Complex business domain with many rules Simple CRUD, few business rules
Long-lived system (years of maintenance) Prototype, MVP, throwaway code
Team of 5+ developers Solo developer or small team (1-2)
Multiple entry points (API, CLI, events) Single entry point, simple API
Need to swap infrastructure (DB, broker) Fixed infrastructure, unlikely to change
High test coverage required Quick scripts, internal tools

Start simple. Evolve complexity only when needed. Most systems don't need full CQRS or Event Sourcing.

CRITICAL: The Dependency Rule

Dependencies point inward only. Outer layers depend on inner layers, never the reverse.

Infrastructure → Application → Domain
   (adapters)     (use cases)    (core)

Violations to catch:

  • Domain importing database/HTTP libraries
  • Controllers calling repositories directly (bypassing use cases)
  • Entities depending on application services

Design validation: "Create your application to work without either a UI or a database" — Alistair Cockburn. If you can run your domain logic from tests with no infrastructure, your boundaries are correct.

Quick Decision Trees

"Where does this code go?"

Where does it go?
├─ Pure business logic, no I/O           → domain/
├─ Orchestrates domain + has side effects → application/
├─ Talks to external systems              → infrastructure/
├─ Defines HOW to interact (interface)    → port (domain or application)
└─ Implements a port                      → adapter (infrastructure)

"Is this an Entity or Value Object?"

Entity or Value Object?
├─ Has unique identity that persists → Entity
├─ Defined only by its attributes    → Value Object
├─ "Is this THE same thing?"         → Entity (identity comparison)
└─ "Does this have the same value?"  → Value Object (structural equality)

"Should this be its own Aggregate?"

Aggregate boundaries?
├─ Must be consistent together in a transaction → Same aggregate
├─ Can be eventually consistent                 → Separate aggregates
├─ Referenced by ID only                        → Separate aggregates
└─ >10 entities in aggregate                    → Split it

Rule: One aggregate per transaction. Cross-aggregate consistency via domain events (eventual consistency).

Directory Structure

src/
├── domain/                    # Core business logic (NO external dependencies)
│   ├── {aggregate}/
│   │   ├── entity              # Aggregate root + child entities
│   │   ├── value_objects       # Immutable value types
│   │   ├── events              # Domain events
│   │   ├── repository          # Repository interface (DRIVEN PORT)
│   │   └── services            # Domain services (stateless logic)
│   └── shared/
│       └── errors              # Domain errors
├── application/               # Use cases / Application services
│   ├── {use-case}/
│   │   ├── command             # Command/Query DTOs
│   │   ├── handler             # Use case implementation
│   │   └── port                # Driver port interface
│   └── shared/
│       └── unit_of_work        # Transaction abstraction
├── infrastructure/            # Adapters (external concerns)
│   ├── persistence/           # Database adapters
│   ├── messaging/             # Message broker adapters
│   ├── http/                  # REST/GraphQL adapters (DRIVER)
│   └── config/
│       └── di                  # Dependency injection / composition root
└── main                        # Bootstrap / entry point

DDD Building Blocks

Pattern Purpose Layer Key Rule
Entity Identity + behavior Domain Equality by ID
Value Object Immutable data Domain Equality by value, no setters
Aggregate Consistency boundary Domain Only root is referenced externally
Domain Event Record of change Domain Past tense naming (OrderPlaced)
Repository Persistence abstraction Domain (port) Per aggregate, not per table
Domain Service Stateless logic Domain When logic doesn't fit an entity
Application Service Orchestration Application Coordinates domain + infra

Anti-Patterns (CRITICAL)

Anti-Pattern Problem Fix
Anemic Domain Model Entities are data bags, logic in services Move behavior INTO entities
Repository per Entity Breaks aggregate boundaries One repository per AGGREGATE
Leaking Infrastructure Domain imports DB/HTTP libs Domain has ZERO external deps
God Aggregate Too many entities, slow transactions Split into smaller aggregates
Skipping Ports Controllers → Repositories directly Always go through application layer
CRUD Thinking Modeling data, not behavior Model business operations
Premature CQRS Adding complexity before needed Start with simple read/write, evolve
Cross-Aggregate TX Multiple aggregates in one transaction Use domain events for consistency

Implementation Order

  1. Discover the Domain — Event Storming, conversations with domain experts
  2. Model the Domain — Entities, value objects, aggregates (no infra)
  3. Define Ports — Repository interfaces, external service interfaces
  4. Implement Use Cases — Application services coordinating domain
  5. Add Adapters last — HTTP, database, messaging implementations

DDD is collaborative. Modeling sessions with domain experts are as important as the code patterns.

Reference Documentation

File Purpose
references/LAYERS.md Complete layer specifications
references/DDD-STRATEGIC.md Bounded contexts, context mapping
references/DDD-TACTICAL.md Entities, value objects, aggregates (pseudocode)
references/HEXAGONAL.md Ports, adapters, naming
references/CQRS-EVENTS.md Command/query separation, events
references/TESTING.md Unit, integration, architecture tests
references/CHEATSHEET.md Quick decision guide

Sources

Primary Sources

Pattern References

Implementation Guides

how to use clean-ddd-hexagonal

How to use clean-ddd-hexagonal on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add clean-ddd-hexagonal
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/ccheney/robust-skills --skill clean-ddd-hexagonal

The skills CLI fetches clean-ddd-hexagonal from GitHub repository ccheney/robust-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/clean-ddd-hexagonal

Reload or restart Cursor to activate clean-ddd-hexagonal. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /clean-ddd-hexagonal) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.626 reviews
  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 8, 2024

    clean-ddd-hexagonal fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dev Garcia· Dec 8, 2024

    We added clean-ddd-hexagonal from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • William Mensah· Dec 8, 2024

    clean-ddd-hexagonal reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Ava Dixit· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend clean-ddd-hexagonal for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Arya Perez· Oct 18, 2024

    Useful defaults in clean-ddd-hexagonal — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Ren Desai· Sep 9, 2024

    clean-ddd-hexagonal is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 5, 2024

    Registry listing for clean-ddd-hexagonal matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Charlotte Verma· Sep 5, 2024

    clean-ddd-hexagonal reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Ava Sethi· Aug 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: clean-ddd-hexagonal is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Pratham Ware· Aug 24, 2024

    clean-ddd-hexagonal reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 26

1 / 3