execute-plan▌
buiducnhat/agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Execute a pre-approved plan with strict adherence to scope, sequence, and verification.
Execute Plan
Overview
Execute a pre-approved plan with strict adherence to scope, sequence, and verification.
The input is typically:
execute-plan docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>/SUMMARY.md- or shorthand:
execute-plan docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>
Do not redesign the plan during execution. If ambiguity or blockers appear, stop and ask.
Workflow
Step 1: Initialize
-
Locate Plan
- Confirm the plan path exists and is readable.
- If a directory is provided, locate
SUMMARY.mdinside it.
-
Load Execution Context
- Load project context per the shared Context Loading Protocol.
- Review the plan’s phase files and dependencies.
-
Select Execution Mode (Explicit Rule)
- Default mode: Batch
- Use Interactive when any of the following is true:
- High-risk changes (auth, payments, migrations, security-critical logic)
- Irreversible operations (data migrations, destructive scripts)
- Unclear acceptance criteria
- User explicitly requests checkpoints
- If mode is unclear, ask once and proceed with user choice.
-
Find Next Pending Phase
- First
[ ]phase - If none, first
[-]phase - If no pending/in-progress phases remain, go to final verification.
- First
-
Critical Plan Sanity Check
- Ensure each phase has:
- clear objective
- file targets
- verification commands
- If essential details are missing or contradictory, stop and request clarification.
- Ensure each phase has:
Step 2: Execute Per-Phase Loop
For each phase in order:
-
Skip Completed
- If status is
[x], continue to next phase.
- If status is
-
Mark In Progress
- Update phase status to
[-]before making changes.
- Update phase status to
-
Execute Exactly
- Implement only the tasks defined in that phase.
- Do not expand scope without approval.
-
Verify Phase
- Run the phase-specific verification commands from the plan.
- At minimum, run relevant tests/checks tied to touched files.
-
Handle Failures
- If verification fails:
- Attempt focused fixes within phase scope.
- Re-run verification.
- If still failing or root cause is outside scope, stop and report blocker.
- If verification fails:
-
Mark Complete
- Update phase status to
[x]only after verification passes.
- Update phase status to
-
Progress Report
- Interactive mode: report and wait for confirmation before next phase.
- Batch mode: report briefly and continue immediately.
Step 3: Final Verification
After all phases are complete:
-
Project-Wide Validation
- Run full lint/type-check suite
- Run all relevant tests (or full test suite if required by the plan)
- Run build verification if applicable
-
Stabilize
- Fix regressions introduced during execution.
- Re-run failed checks until green or blocked.
-
Manual Validation Checkpoint
- If user/manual QA is required, ask explicitly and pause:
Verifiedto accept- or provide feedback for follow-up iteration
- If user/manual QA is required, ask explicitly and pause:
Step 4: Completion Artifacts
-
Documentation Sync
- If behavior/architecture/codebase expectations changed, update the
docsartifacts.
- If behavior/architecture/codebase expectations changed, update the
-
Create Execution Report
- File:
docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>/EXECUTION-REPORT.md - Include all required sections below.
- File:
-
Archive Plan Folder
- Move the plan folder to
docs/plans/archived/after the execution report is created. - Command:
mkdir -p docs/plans/archived && mv docs/plans/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug> docs/plans/archived/
- Move the plan folder to
-
Announce Completion
- Output:
Execution complete. Report archived at docs/plans/archived/YYMMDD-HHmm-<plan-slug>/EXECUTION-REPORT.md.
- Output:
Execution Report Standard
EXECUTION-REPORT.md must use this structure:
Execution Report:
Date: YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss
Mode: Batch | Interactive
Summary
- Overall result (Completed | Completed with follow-ups | Blocked)
- High-level outcome in 2-4 bullets
Phase Results
- Phase 1: — ✅/⚠️
- Implemented:
- Verification:
- Notes:
- Phase 2: ...
Verification Matrix
- Lint: pass/fail (command)
- Type-check: pass/fail (command)
- Tests: pass/fail (command)
- Build: pass/fail (command)
- Manual QA: pass/fail/pending
Deviations
- List any approved deviations from the original plan.
- If none:
None.
Blockers and Resolutions
- Blocker:
- Impact:
- Resolution:
- Status:
Follow-ups
- Remaining tasks, if any
- Recommended owner/next action
Changed Files
- Relative path list (grouped by area if large)
Rules
- Follow the plan strictly: no silent scope changes.
- Stop on blocker: missing dependency, contradictory instructions, or unexplained failures.
- No guessing: ask for clarification when uncertain.
- Verify before complete: never mark phase done without passing checks.
- Idempotency: prefer safe/re-runnable operations.
- Respect project standards: follow
docs/code-standard.mdand related project docs. - Do not skip workflow steps: initialization, per-phase verification, final verification, and reporting are all mandatory.
How to use execute-plan on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add execute-plan
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches execute-plan from GitHub repository buiducnhat/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate execute-plan. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /execute-plan) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★42 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: execute-plan is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Soo Torres· Dec 20, 2024
We added execute-plan from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Diego Park· Dec 20, 2024
I recommend execute-plan for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Diego Haddad· Dec 12, 2024
Keeps context tight: execute-plan is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Liam Perez· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in execute-plan — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024
We added execute-plan from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend execute-plan for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Soo Diallo· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: execute-plan is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Camila Malhotra· Nov 3, 2024
Registry listing for execute-plan matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kiara Martinez· Oct 22, 2024
execute-plan reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 42