hr-business-partner

borghei/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill hr-business-partner
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

The agent operates as a strategic HRBP, partnering with business leaders to align people strategy with organizational goals across talent planning, performance management, employee relations, and compensation.

skill.md

HR Business Partner

The agent operates as a strategic HRBP, partnering with business leaders to align people strategy with organizational goals across talent planning, performance management, employee relations, and compensation.

Workflow

  1. Diagnose the business need -- Meet with the business leader to understand their strategic priorities for the next 1-4 quarters. Identify people-related gaps: headcount, skills, retention, engagement, or organizational design.
  2. Assess current state -- Pull workforce data: headcount, attrition rate, engagement scores, open roles, and performance distribution. Validate data accuracy before proceeding.
  3. Build the people plan -- Develop a workforce plan using the template below. Include hiring targets, development investments, succession depth, and risk mitigation for attrition.
  4. Execute and advise -- Partner with Talent Acquisition on hiring, run calibration sessions for performance, coach managers on difficult conversations, and resolve ER cases using the issue resolution framework.
  5. Measure and report -- Track KPIs quarterly (see People Metrics). Present findings to leadership with recommendations.
  6. Iterate -- Adjust the plan based on business changes, attrition trends, and engagement survey results.

Checkpoint: After step 2, confirm that attrition data distinguishes voluntary from involuntary and regrettable from non-regrettable before planning.

People Metrics

Category Metric Formula / Source Benchmark
Headcount Total HC HRIS snapshot --
Attrition Voluntary turnover Voluntary exits / Avg HC x 100 10-15%
Attrition Regrettable turnover Regrettable exits / Total exits < 30%
Hiring Time to fill Req open to offer accept 30-45 days
Engagement eNPS Promoters - Detractors 20-40
Performance High-performer ratio Top-tier ratings / HC 15-20%
Diversity Representation Demographic breakdown by level Org-specific targets
Compensation Compa-ratio Actual pay / Band midpoint 0.95-1.05

Workforce Planning Template

# Workforce Plan: [Department] -- [Year]

## Current State
- Headcount: [X]
- Open roles: [X]
- Voluntary attrition (trailing 12 mo): [X]%
- Engagement score: [X] / 100
- Regrettable turnover: [X]%

## Future State (12 months)
- Target headcount: [X] (growth: [X]%)
- Critical skills needed: [list]
- Organizational design changes: [if any]

## Gap Analysis
| Role / Skill | Current | Needed | Gap | Action |
|-------------|---------|--------|-----|--------|
| [Role A] | 3 | 5 | +2 | Hire Q1-Q2 |
| [Skill B] | Low proficiency | Intermediate | Gap | Training program |

## Hiring Plan
| Quarter | Roles | Headcount | Budget |
|---------|-------|-----------|--------|
| Q1 | [Roles] | [X] | $[Y] |
| Q2 | [Roles] | [X] | $[Y] |

## Succession Plan
| Critical Role | Incumbent | Ready Now | Ready 1-2 yr |
|---------------|-----------|-----------|--------------|
| [VP Engineering] | [Name] | [Name] | [Name, Name] |

## Risk Register
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|------------|
| Key-person dependency | High | Critical | Cross-train 2 backups by Q2 |
| Attrition spike in Sales | Medium | High | Retention bonuses, stay interviews |

Performance Management Cycle

Quarter Activity HRBP Role
Q1 Goal setting -- cascade company OKRs to individual goals Review goal quality, ensure alignment
Q2 Mid-year check-in -- progress review, feedback exchange Coach managers on feedback delivery
Q3 Ongoing development -- 1:1s, real-time feedback, training Monitor development plan completion
Q4 Year-end review -- self-assessment, manager assessment, calibration Facilitate calibration, advise on ratings

Calibration Session Guide

  1. Prepare -- Collect manager-submitted ratings. Flag outliers (> 40% top-tier or > 20% bottom-tier in any team). Pull performance data and promotion history.
  2. Facilitate -- Walk through each team's distribution. Managers present evidence for outlier ratings. Challenge ratings that lack behavioral evidence.
  3. Align -- Reach consensus on final ratings. Ensure the overall distribution is defensible (no forced curve, but consistent standards).
  4. Document -- Record final ratings and rationale for any changes. Feed into compensation decisions.

Checkpoint: Verify that every "exceeds expectations" rating has at least two documented behavioral examples before finalizing.

Employee Relations: Issue Resolution Framework

  1. Listen -- Hear the concern fully. Take notes. Acknowledge the employee's experience without making commitments.
  2. Investigate -- Gather facts from all relevant parties. Review documentation, emails, and policies. Maintain confidentiality.
  3. Analyze -- Identify root cause. Assess policy and legal implications (consult employment counsel if needed). Evaluate options.
  4. Resolve -- Determine the appropriate action. Communicate the decision to all parties. Implement the resolution.
  5. Follow up -- Check on the outcome within 2 weeks. Document the case. Identify systemic patterns that may need policy changes.

Difficult Conversations Framework (SBI-E)

Element Description Example
Situation When and where "In last Tuesday's team standup..."
Behavior Observable action "...you interrupted two colleagues mid-sentence."
Impact Effect on team/work "The team hesitated to share updates afterward."
Expectation What needs to change "Going forward, let each person finish before responding."

Example: Workforce Plan for a Scaling Engineering Org

CONTEXT
  Current: 45 engineers, 8% attrition, 3 open reqs, engagement 74/100
  Business goal: Launch 2 new products requiring +15 engineers in 12 months

WORKFORCE PLAN

  Gap Analysis:
    Frontend engineers: have 12, need 18 (+6)
    ML engineers: have 3, need 8 (+5)
    Engineering managers: have 5, need 7 (+2, promote from within if possible)
    Platform engineers: have 10, need 14 (+4)

  Hiring Plan:
    Q1: 5 hires (3 frontend, 2 ML) -- $25K recruiting cost
    Q2: 5 hires (2 ML, 2 platform, 1 frontend) -- $25K
    Q3: 4 hires (2 platform, 1 frontend, 1 ML) -- $20K
    Q4: 1 hire (manager backfill if internal promo) -- $5K

  Succession:
    Promote 2 senior engineers to EM by Q2 (already in leadership program)
    Backfill their IC roles in Q3

  Risks:
    ML talent market is tight -- offer 75th percentile comp, sign-on bonus
    2 senior engineers flagged as flight risk -- schedule stay interviews Q1

  Budget: $75K recruiting + $120K incremental comp (15 new heads, partial year)

Compensation Philosophy

Element Approach
Market positioning Target 50th-75th percentile for base; equity for upside
Pay components Base (70%), variable/bonus (15%), equity (15%)
Pay decisions Based on role level, performance, market data, internal equity
Review cadence Annual merit cycle + promotion adjustments + market corrections
Transparency Share band ranges with employees; publish leveling framework

Offer Approval Workflow

  1. Recruiter proposes offer based on compensation band and candidate profile.
  2. Hiring manager confirms level, scope, and team fit.
  3. HRBP reviews for internal equity (compa-ratio within 0.90-1.10 for same level/geo).
  4. Finance approves if above band midpoint or if headcount was not pre-approved.
  5. Offer extended.

Reference Materials

  • references/talent_planning.md - Workforce planning guide
  • references/performance.md - Performance management
  • references/employee_relations.md - ER best practices
  • references/compensation.md - Comp philosophy and guidelines

Scripts

# Score organizational health from workforce metrics
python scripts/org_health_scorer.py --file org_metrics.csv
python scripts/org_health_scorer.py --file org_metrics.csv --json

# Analyze compensation for pay equity
python scripts/compensation_analyzer.py --file comp_data.csv
python scripts/compensation_analyzer.py --file comp_data.csv --json

# Generate workforce dashboard from HR data
python scripts/workforce_dashboard.py --file workforce.csv
python scripts/workforce_dashboard.py --file workforce.csv --json

Troubleshooting

Problem Root Cause Resolution
Business leaders treat HRBP as transactional HR Unclear role definition, reactive posture, or lack of business acumen Establish a formal operating model: 70% strategic / 30% operational; present quarterly people plans tied to business OKRs; delegate administrative tasks to HR shared services
Calibration sessions devolve into arguments No shared rubric, manager defensiveness, or lack of pre-work Require managers to submit ratings with 2+ behavioral evidence examples before the session; facilitate with a neutral framework; start with aligned ratings and work through outliers
Workforce plan disconnected from business strategy HRBP not included in business planning, or plan built in isolation Attend leadership team meetings; build workforce plan as an appendix to the business plan; tie every headcount request to a revenue or product milestone
High regrettable turnover in specific teams Manager quality issues, compensation misalignment, or stalled career paths Run stay interviews with high performers; analyze exit data by manager; benchmark comp by role and level; publish career ladders with clear promotion criteria
Employee relations cases escalate unnecessarily Late intervention, poor documentation, or inconsistent policy application Train managers on early issue identification; standardize the ER intake and investigation framework; conduct monthly ER case reviews to identify patterns
Performance review cycle seen as bureaucratic Too many forms, unclear purpose, or ratings disconnected from comp Simplify to a 2-page template; connect review outcomes directly to merit and promotion decisions; train managers on feedback delivery (SBI-E model)
Change management initiatives fail to stick Insufficient sponsorship, poor communication cadence, or no measurement Apply Kotter's 8-step model; secure visible executive sponsorship; communicate in 5+ channels; measure adoption at 30/60/90 days

Success Criteria

Dimension Metric Target Measurement
Strategic Impact Business leader satisfaction with HRBP > 4.0 / 5.0 Annual stakeholder survey
Strategic Impact % time spent on strategic activities > 60%
how to use hr-business-partner

How to use hr-business-partner on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add hr-business-partner
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill hr-business-partner

The skills CLI fetches hr-business-partner from GitHub repository borghei/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/hr-business-partner

Reload or restart Cursor to activate hr-business-partner. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /hr-business-partner) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.672 reviews
  • Neel Perez· Dec 28, 2024

    hr-business-partner reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Liam Flores· Dec 16, 2024

    hr-business-partner is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024

    I recommend hr-business-partner for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Kofi Garcia· Dec 12, 2024

    hr-business-partner fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Liam Torres· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend hr-business-partner for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Nia Martinez· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for hr-business-partner matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Isabella Thompson· Nov 23, 2024

    hr-business-partner fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Anika Gill· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in hr-business-partner — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chinedu Sanchez· Nov 19, 2024

    hr-business-partner is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kofi Thompson· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for hr-business-partner matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 72

1 / 8