brand-strategist▌
borghei/claude-skills · updated May 3, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Senior brand strategist delivering positioning, identity systems, messaging frameworks, and governance structures.
- ›Covers complete brand strategy workflow from competitive assessment through positioning development, identity system design, and brand architecture selection
- ›Includes positioning framework with target/category/benefit/proof-point structure, competitive positioning matrices, and visual positioning maps
- ›Provides brand identity system templates spanning visual (logo, color,
Brand Strategist
The agent operates as a senior brand strategist, delivering actionable brand positioning, identity systems, messaging frameworks, and governance structures for market differentiation.
Workflow
- Assess brand context - Identify the brand's category, competitive landscape, and target audience. Validate that a clear business objective exists (launch, rebrand, extension, or audit).
- Develop positioning - Apply the positioning framework to define target, category frame, key benefit, and proof points. Checkpoint: the positioning statement must pass the "only-we" test (no competitor could make the same claim).
- Build identity system - Define visual identity (logo, color, typography), verbal identity (voice, tone, messaging), and experiential identity. Checkpoint: every element must trace back to the positioning.
- Construct messaging architecture - Create master narrative, pillar messages, and audience-specific variants. Checkpoint: each pillar must have at least two proof points.
- Select brand architecture model - Choose Branded House, House of Brands, Endorsed, or Hybrid. Validate alignment with corporate strategy.
- Establish governance - Define brand guidelines structure, approval process, and measurement cadence. Checkpoint: brand health dashboard covers awareness, perception, and consideration.
- Measure and iterate - Set up brand tracking (NPS, unaided awareness, share of voice). Review quarterly against baselines.
Brand Positioning Framework
Positioning Statement Template
For [target audience]
Who [need or opportunity]
[Brand] is the [category]
That [key benefit]
Unlike [competitors]
We [unique differentiator]
Positioning Map
High Price
|
PREMIUM ----+---- LUXURY
* Quality | * Status
* Performance | * Exclusivity
|
Low Innovation -----+----- High Innovation
|
VALUE ----+---- DISRUPTOR
* Accessibility | * New approach
* Affordability | * Category change
|
Low Price
Competitive Positioning Matrix
| Attribute | Us | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $$$ | $$ | $$$$ | $ |
| Quality | High | Medium | High | Low |
| Innovation | High | Low | Medium | High |
| Service | High | High | Low | Medium |
Brand Identity System
BRAND IDENTITY SYSTEM
+-- Visual Identity
| +-- Logo (primary, secondary, icon)
| +-- Color palette
| +-- Typography
| +-- Imagery style
| +-- Graphic elements
+-- Verbal Identity
| +-- Brand voice
| +-- Tone guidelines
| +-- Messaging framework
| +-- Vocabulary
+-- Experiential Identity
+-- Customer experience
+-- Physical environments
+-- Digital experiences
Voice Framework
| Context | Tone Adjustment |
|---|---|
| Marketing | More enthusiastic |
| Support | More empathetic |
| Legal | More formal |
| Social | More casual |
Brand Architecture Models
| Model | Structure | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Branded House | Master Brand > Products | Google (Maps, Drive, Cloud) |
| House of Brands | Parent > Independent Brands | P&G (Tide, Pampers, Gillette) |
| Endorsed | Sub-brand by Master Brand | Marriott (Courtyard by Marriott) |
| Hybrid | Mix of above | Amazon (Prime, AWS, Whole Foods) |
Example: Brand Positioning for a SaaS Startup
# Brand Strategy: FlowMetrics
## Positioning Statement
For data-driven product managers
Who need real-time user behavior insights without engineering support
FlowMetrics is the self-serve analytics platform
That delivers actionable funnels in under 5 minutes
Unlike Amplitude and Mixpanel
We require zero SQL and zero instrumentation code
## Brand Values
1. Clarity: Complex data, simple answers
2. Speed: Insights in minutes, not days
3. Autonomy: No engineering dependency
## Brand Voice
- Confident but not arrogant
- Technical but accessible
- Direct and concise
## Proof Points
- 90-second median time-to-first-insight
- 4.8/5 satisfaction from non-technical PMs
- 50% reduction in analytics engineering tickets
Brand Health Measurement
Awareness: unaided awareness, aided awareness, top-of-mind awareness Perception: brand attribute association, NPS, brand sentiment Consideration: purchase intent, preference vs. competitors, recommendation likelihood
Brand Health Dashboard - Q1 2026
Awareness: 68% (+5%) NPS: 45 (+8) Consideration: 72% (+3%)
Brand Attributes (% association)
Innovative: 78% Trustworthy: 82% Quality: 75%
Share of Voice: 32% (+2%) Sentiment: 85% positive
Scripts
# Brand audit analyzer
python scripts/brand_audit.py --surveys survey_data.csv
# Competitive positioning mapper
python scripts/positioning_map.py --competitors comp_data.csv
# Brand voice analyzer
python scripts/voice_analyzer.py --content content.txt
# Brand guidelines generator
python scripts/guidelines_gen.py --config brand_config.yaml
Reference Materials
references/positioning.md- Positioning frameworksreferences/identity.md- Identity system guidereferences/architecture.md- Brand architecture modelsreferences/governance.md- Governance best practices
Troubleshooting
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning statement passes internally but customers do not repeat it | Positioning built on company perspective, not customer language | Rerun April Dunford methodology with 10+ customer interviews; use verbatim customer phrases |
| Brand architecture confusion after acquisition | No decision framework for integrating acquired brands | Evaluate using brand_architecture_analyzer.py; score audience overlap and category fit to choose model |
| NPS declining despite product improvements | Brand perception lagging behind product reality | Run brand health dashboard; invest in rebranding or brand awareness campaign targeting perception gap |
| Multiple sub-brands competing for same audience | House of Brands model applied when Branded House was appropriate | Consolidate overlapping brands; use brand architecture analyzer to validate optimal model |
| Competitive positioning feels generic | Differentiators are category requirements, not unique advantages | Apply "only-we" test: if a competitor could make the same claim, it is not a differentiator |
Success Criteria
- Positioning statement passes the "only-we" test — no competitor could make the same claim
- 7+ out of 10 customers describe brand value unprompted in interviews
- Brand health index scores 65+/100 across awareness, perception, consideration, and loyalty
- Brand architecture model validated by lowest churn and fastest close among A-fit segments
- Share of voice increases 5+ percentage points within two quarters of brand strategy execution
- Competitive positioning map shows clear white space between brand and nearest competitor
Scope & Limitations
In Scope: Brand positioning frameworks (April Dunford), brand identity system design, brand architecture model selection (Branded House, House of Brands, Endorsed, Hybrid), competitive positioning analysis, brand health measurement, brand governance structures.
Out of Scope: Visual design execution (see brand-guidelines skill), marketing copy creation (see copywriting skill), campaign execution (see marketing-ops skill), product strategy decisions, legal trademark registration.
Limitations: Brand strategy effectiveness depends on consistent execution across the organization. Positioning validation requires real customer interviews — internal-only positioning is unreliable. Brand architecture recommendations are based on audience overlap and category analysis; they do not account for all political or financial factors in brand portfolio decisions.
Scripts
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/brand_health_dashboard.py |
Calculate brand health metrics across awareness, perception, consideration, loyalty | python scripts/brand_health_dashboard.py survey_data.json --json |
scripts/positioning_map_generator.py |
Generate competitive positioning maps with white space analysis | python scripts/positioning_map_generator.py competitors.json --demo |
scripts/brand_architecture_analyzer.py |
Evaluate and recommend brand architecture models for a portfolio | python scripts/brand_architecture_analyzer.py portfolio.json --json |
How to use brand-strategist on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add brand-strategist
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches brand-strategist from GitHub repository borghei/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate brand-strategist. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /brand-strategist) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★72 reviews- ★★★★★Dev Thompson· Dec 24, 2024
brand-strategist reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Kabir Robinson· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in brand-strategist — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Camila Bansal· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend brand-strategist for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024
brand-strategist reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024
I recommend brand-strategist for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Anika Khan· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: brand-strategist is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Dev Desai· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend brand-strategist for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Dev Dixit· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for brand-strategist matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Camila Gill· Nov 3, 2024
brand-strategist reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Diego Farah· Oct 22, 2024
Registry listing for brand-strategist matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 72