wordpress-security-validation

bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill wordpress-security-validation
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Version: 1.0.0

  • Target: WordPress 6.7+ | PHP 8.3+
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
skill.md

WordPress Security & Data Validation

Version: 1.0.0 Target: WordPress 6.7+ | PHP 8.3+ Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced

Overview

Security is not optional in WordPress development—it's fundamental. This skill teaches the three-layer security model that prevents XSS, CSRF, SQL injection, and other common web vulnerabilities through proper input sanitization, business logic validation, and output escaping.

The Golden Rule: "Sanitize on input, validate for logic, escape on output."

Why This Matters

Every year, thousands of WordPress sites are compromised due to security vulnerabilities in plugins and themes. Most of these attacks exploit one of three weaknesses:

  1. XSS (Cross-Site Scripting): Malicious JavaScript injected through unsanitized output
  2. CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery): Unauthorized actions performed on behalf of authenticated users
  3. SQL Injection: Database manipulation through unsanitized database queries

This skill provides complete, production-ready patterns for preventing all three attack vectors.


The Three-Layer Security Model

WordPress security follows a defense-in-depth strategy with three distinct layers:

User Input → [1. SANITIZE] → [2. VALIDATE] → Process → [3. ESCAPE] → Output

Layer 1: Sanitization (Input Cleaning)

Purpose: Remove dangerous characters and normalize data format When: Immediately upon receiving user input Example: sanitize_text_field($_POST['username'])

Layer 2: Validation (Logic Checks)

Purpose: Ensure data meets business requirements When: After sanitization, before processing Example: if (!is_email($email)) { /* error */ }

Layer 3: Escaping (Output Protection)

Purpose: Prevent XSS by encoding special characters When: Every time you output data to browser Example: echo esc_html($user_input);

Critical Distinction:

  • Sanitization removes/transforms invalid data (changes the value)
  • Validation checks if data is acceptable (returns true/false)
  • Escaping makes data safe for display (context-specific encoding)

1. Nonces: CSRF Protection

What Are Nonces?

Nonces (Numbers Used Once) are cryptographic tokens that verify a request originated from your site, not a malicious external source. They prevent Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks.

How CSRF Attacks Work:

<!-- Attacker's malicious site: evil.com -->
<img src="https://yoursite.com/wp-admin/admin.php?action=delete_user&id=1">
<!-- If user is logged into yoursite.com, this executes! -->

How Nonces Prevent CSRF:

<!-- Legitimate request with nonce -->
<form action="admin.php?action=delete_user&id=1" method="POST">
    <?php wp_nonce_field('delete_user_1', 'delete_nonce'); ?>
    <button>Delete User</button>
</form>

<!-- Attacker cannot generate valid nonce (tied to user session) -->

Nonce Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Form Nonces (Most Common)

BEFORE (Vulnerable):

// Vulnerable form processing
if (isset($_POST['submit'])) {
    $user_id = absint($_POST['user_id']);
    delete_user($user_id); // ⚠️ CSRF vulnerable!
}

AFTER (Secure):

// Generate nonce in form
<form method="post" action="">
    <?php wp_nonce_field('delete_user_action', 'delete_user_nonce'); ?>
    <input type="hidden" name="user_id" value="42">
    <button type="submit" name="submit">Delete User</button>
</form>

// Verify nonce on submission
if (isset($_POST['submit'])) {
    // Security check #1: Verify nonce
    if (!isset($_POST['delete_user_nonce']) ||
        !wp_verify_nonce($_POST['delete_user_nonce'], 'delete_user_action')) {
        wp_die('Security check failed: Invalid nonce');
    }

    // Security check #2: Capability check
    if (!current_user_can('delete_users')) {
        wp_die('You do not have permission to delete users');
    }

    // Now safe to process
    $user_id = absint($_POST['user_id']);
    wp_delete_user($user_id);
}

Key Functions:

  • wp_nonce_field($action, $name) - Generates hidden nonce field
  • wp_verify_nonce($nonce, $action) - Verifies nonce validity

Pattern 2: URL Nonces

Use Case: Delete/trash links, admin actions

// Generate nonce URL
$delete_url = wp_nonce_url(
    admin_url('admin.php?action=delete_post&post_id=123'),
    'delete_post_123',  // Action (must be unique)
    'delete_nonce'      // Query parameter name
);

echo '<a href="' . esc_url($delete_url) . '">Delete Post</a>';

// Verify nonce in handler
add_action('admin_action_delete_post', 'handle_delete_post');
function handle_delete_post() {
    // Verify nonce from URL
    if (!isset($_GET['delete_nonce']) ||
        !wp_verify_nonce($_GET['delete_nonce'], 'delete_post_123')) {
        wp_die('Invalid security token');
    }

    // Verify capability
    $post_id = absint($_GET['post_id']);
    if (!current_user_can('delete_post', $post_id)) {
        wp_die('You cannot delete this post');
    }

    // Delete post
    wp_delete_post($post_id, true); // true = force delete

    // Redirect with success message
    wp_redirect(add_query_arg('message', 'deleted', wp_get_referer()));
    exit;
}

Pattern 3: AJAX Nonces

Use Case: Frontend AJAX requests

BEFORE (Vulnerable):

// ⚠️ Vulnerable AJAX request
jQuery.post(ajaxurl, {
    action: 'update_user_meta',
    user_id: 42,
    meta_key: 'favorite_color',
    meta_value: 'blue'
}, function(response) {
    console.log(response);
});

AFTER (Secure):

PHP (Enqueue script with nonce):

add_action('wp_enqueue_scripts', 'enqueue_ajax_script');
function enqueue_ajax_script() {
    wp_enqueue_script('my-ajax-script',
        plugin_dir_url(__FILE__) . 'js/ajax.js',
        ['jquery'],
        '1.0.0',
        true
    );

    // Pass nonce and AJAX URL to JavaScript
    wp_localize_script('my-ajax-script', 'myAjax', [
        'ajaxurl' => admin_url('admin-ajax.php'),
        
how to use wordpress-security-validation

How to use wordpress-security-validation on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add wordpress-security-validation
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill wordpress-security-validation

The skills CLI fetches wordpress-security-validation from GitHub repository bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/wordpress-security-validation

Reload or restart Cursor to activate wordpress-security-validation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /wordpress-security-validation) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.739 reviews
  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in wordpress-security-validation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Li Rahman· Dec 16, 2024

    wordpress-security-validation has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Li Kim· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: wordpress-security-validation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Li Mensah· Dec 4, 2024

    We added wordpress-security-validation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Olivia Haddad· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for wordpress-security-validation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 15, 2024

    wordpress-security-validation has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Li Huang· Nov 11, 2024

    wordpress-security-validation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dev Okafor· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in wordpress-security-validation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chen Khan· Oct 26, 2024

    I recommend wordpress-security-validation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Olivia Garcia· Oct 18, 2024

    wordpress-security-validation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 39

1 / 4