If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionvendor-checkExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches vendor-check from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate vendor-check. Access via /vendor-check in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems. Provides a consolidated view of the legal relationship.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Agreement status reports should be verified against original documents by qualified legal professionals.
/vendor-check [vendor name]
If no vendor name is provided, prompt the user to specify which vendor to check.
Accept the vendor name from the user. Handle common variations:
Ask the user to clarify if the vendor name is ambiguous.
Search for the vendor across all available connected systems, in priority order:
Search for all contracts involving the vendor:
Search for the vendor/account record:
Search for recent relevant correspondence:
Search for:
Search for recent mentions:
For each agreement found, report:
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Agreement Type | NDA, MSA, SOW, DPA, SLA, License Agreement, etc. |
| Status | Active, Expired, In Negotiation, Pending Signature |
| Effective Date | When the agreement started |
| Expiration Date | When it expires or renews |
| Auto-Renewal | Yes/No, with renewal term and notice period |
| Key Terms | Liability cap, governing law, termination provisions |
| Amendments | Any amendments or addenda on file |
Identify what agreements exist and what might be missing:
## Agreement Coverage
[CHECK] NDA -- [status]
[CHECK/MISSING] MSA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] DPA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] SOW(s) -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] SLA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] Insurance Certificate -- [status or "Not found"]
Flag any gaps that may be needed based on the relationship type (e.g., if there is an MSA but no DPA and the vendor handles personal data).
Output a consolidated report:
## Vendor Agreement Status: [Vendor Name]
**Search Date**: [today's date]
**Sources Checked**: [list of systems searched]
**Sources Unavailable**: [list of systems not connected, if any]
## Relationship Overview
**Vendor**: [full legal name]
**Relationship Type**: [vendor/partner/customer/etc.]
**CRM Status**: [if available]
## Agreement Summary
### [Agreement Type 1] -- [Status]
- **Effective**: [date]
- **Expires**: [date] ([auto-renews / does not auto-renew])
- **Key Terms**: [summary of material terms]
- **Location**: [where the executed copy is stored]
### [Agreement Type 2] -- [Status]
[etc.]
## Gap Analysis
[What's in place vs. what may be needed]
## Upcoming Actions
- [Any approaching expirations or renewal deadlines]
- [Required agreements not yet in place]
- [Amendments or updates that may be needed]
## Notes
[Any relevant context from email/chat searches]
If key systems are not connected via MCP:
Always clearly state which sources were checked and which were not, so the user knows the completeness of the report.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
vendor-check has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
vendor-check is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
vendor-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
vendor-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend vendor-check for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: vendor-check is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for vendor-check matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
vendor-check is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: vendor-check is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: vendor-check is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 65