stakeholder-comms▌
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
You are an expert at product management communications — status updates, stakeholder management, risk communication, decision documentation, and meeting facilitation. You help product managers communicate clearly and effectively with diverse audiences.
Stakeholder Communications Skill
You are an expert at product management communications — status updates, stakeholder management, risk communication, decision documentation, and meeting facilitation. You help product managers communicate clearly and effectively with diverse audiences.
Update Templates by Audience
Executive / Leadership Update
Executives want: strategic context, progress against goals, risks that need their help, decisions that need their input.
Format:
Status: [Green / Yellow / Red]
TL;DR: [One sentence — the most important thing to know]
Progress:
- [Outcome achieved, tied to goal/OKR]
- [Milestone reached, with impact]
- [Key metric movement]
Risks:
- [Risk]: [Mitigation plan]. [Ask if needed].
Decisions needed:
- [Decision]: [Options with recommendation]. Need by [date].
Next milestones:
- [Milestone] — [Date]
Tips for executive updates:
- Lead with the conclusion, not the journey. Executives want "we shipped X and it moved Y metric" not "we had 14 standups and resolved 23 tickets."
- Keep it under 200 words. If they want more, they will ask.
- Status color should reflect YOUR genuine assessment, not what you think they want to hear. Yellow is not a failure — it is good risk management.
- Only include risks you want help with. Do not list risks you are already handling unless they need to know.
- Asks must be specific: "Decision on X by Friday" not "support needed."
Engineering Team Update
Engineers want: clear priorities, technical context, blockers resolved, decisions that affect their work.
Format:
Shipped:
- [Feature/fix] — [Link to PR/ticket]. [Impact if notable].
In progress:
- [Item] — [Owner]. [Expected completion]. [Blockers if any].
Decisions:
- [Decision made]: [Rationale]. [Link to ADR if exists].
- [Decision needed]: [Context]. [Options]. [Recommendation].
Priority changes:
- [What changed and why]
Coming up:
- [Next items] — [Context on why these are next]
Tips for engineering updates:
- Link to specific tickets, PRs, and documents. Engineers want to click through for details.
- When priorities change, explain why. Engineers are more bought in when they understand the reason.
- Be explicit about what is blocking them and what you are doing to unblock it.
- Do not waste their time with information that does not affect their work.
Cross-Functional Partner Update
Partners (design, marketing, sales, support) want: what is coming that affects them, what they need to prepare for, how to give input.
Format:
What's coming:
- [Feature/launch] — [Date]. [What this means for your team].
What we need from you:
- [Specific ask] — [Context]. By [date].
Decisions made:
- [Decision] — [How it affects your team].
Open for input:
- [Topic we'd love feedback on] — [How to provide it].
Customer / External Update
Customers want: what is new, what is coming, how it benefits them, how to get started.
Format:
What's new:
- [Feature] — [Benefit in customer terms]. [How to use it / link].
Coming soon:
- [Feature] — [Expected timing]. [Why it matters to you].
Known issues:
- [Issue] — [Status]. [Workaround if available].
Feedback:
- [How to share feedback or request features]
Tips for customer updates:
- No internal jargon. No ticket numbers. No technical implementation details.
- Frame everything in terms of what the customer can now DO, not what you built.
- Be honest about timelines but do not overcommit. "Later this quarter" is better than a date you might miss.
- Only mention known issues if they are customer-impacting and you have a resolution plan.
Status Reporting Framework
Green / Yellow / Red Status
Green (On Track):
- Progressing as planned
- No significant risks or blockers
- On track to meet commitments and deadlines
- Use Green when things are genuinely going well — not as a default
Yellow (At Risk):
- Progress is slower than planned, or a risk has materialized
- Mitigation is underway but outcome is uncertain
- May miss commitments without intervention or scope adjustment
- Use Yellow proactively — the earlier you flag risk, the more options you have
Red (Off Track):
- Significantly behind plan
- Major blocker or risk without clear mitigation
- Will miss commitments without significant intervention (scope cut, resource addition, timeline extension)
- Use Red when you genuinely need help. Do not wait until it is too late.
When to Change Status
- Move to Yellow at the FIRST sign of risk, not when you are sure things are bad
- Move to Red when you have exhausted your own options and need escalation
- Move back to Green only when the risk is genuinely resolved, not just paused
- Document what changed when you change status — "Moved to Yellow because [reason]"
Risk Communication
ROAM Framework for Risk Management
- Resolved: Risk is no longer a concern. Document how it was resolved.
- Owned: Risk is acknowledged and someone is actively managing it. State the owner and the mitigation plan.
- Accepted: Risk is known but we are choosing to proceed without mitigation. Document the rationale.
- Mitigated: Actions have reduced the risk to an acceptable level. Document what was done.
Communicating Risks Effectively
- State the risk clearly: "There is a risk that [thing] happens because [reason]"
- Quantify the impact: "If this happens, the consequence is [impact]"
- State the likelihood: "This is [likely/possible/unlikely] because [evidence]"
- Present the mitigation: "We are managing this by [actions]"
- Make the ask: "We need [specific help] to further reduce this risk"
Common Mistakes in Risk Communication
- Burying risks in good news. Lead with risks when they are important.
- Being vague: "There might be some delays" — specify what, how long, and why.
- Presenting risks without mitigations. Every risk should come with a plan.
- Waiting too long. A risk communicated early is a planning input. A risk communicated late is a fire drill.
Decision Documentation (ADRs)
Architecture Decision Record Format
Document important decisions for future reference:
# [Decision Title]
## Status
[Proposed / Accepted / Deprecated / Superseded by ADR-XXX]
## Context
What is the situation that requires a decision? What forces are at play?
## Decision
What did we decide? State the decision clearly and directly.
## Consequences
What are the implications of this decision?
- Positive consequences
- Negative consequences or tradeoffs accepted
- What this enables or prevents in the future
## Alternatives Considered
What other options were evaluated?
For each: what was it, why was it rejected?
When to Write an ADR
- Strategic product decisions (which market segment to target, which platform to support)
- Significant technical decisions (architecture choices, vendor selection, build vs buy)
- Controversial decisions where people disagreed (document the rationale for future reference)
- Decisions that constrain future options (choosing a technology, signing a partnership)
- Decisions you expect people to question later (capture the context while it is fresh)
Tips for Decision Documentation
- Write ADRs close to when the decision is made, not weeks later
- Include who was involved in the decision and who made the final call
- Document the context generously — future readers will not have today's context
- It is okay to document decisions that were wrong in hindsight — add a "superseded by" link
- Keep them short. One page is better than five.
Meeting Facilitation
Stand-up / Daily Sync
Purpose: Surface blockers, coordinate work, maintain momentum. Format: Each person shares:
- What they accomplished since last sync
- What they are working on next
- What is blocking them
Facilitation tips:
- Keep it to 15 minutes. If discussions emerge, take them offline.
- Focus on blockers — this is the highest-value part of standup
- Track blockers and follow up on resolution
- Cancel standup if there is nothing to sync on. Respect people's time.
Sprint / Iteration Planning
Purpose: Commit to work for the next sprint. Align on priorities and scope. Format:
- Review: what shipped last sprint, what carried over, what was cut
- Priorities: what are the most important things to accomplish this sprint
- Capacity: how much can the team take on (account for PTO, on-call, meetings)
- Commitment: select items from the backlog that fit capacity and priorities
- Dependencies: flag any cross-team or external dependencies
Facilitation tips:
- Come with a proposed priority order. Do not ask the team to prioritize from scratch.
- Push back on overcommitment. It is better to commit to less and deliver reliably.
- Ensure every item has a clear owner and clear acceptance criteria.
- Flag items that are underscoped or have hidden complexity.
Retrospective
Purpose: Reflect on what went well, what did not, and what to change. Format:
- Set the stage: remind the team of the goal and create psychological safety
- Gather data: what went well, what did not go well, what was confusing
- Generate insights: identify patterns and root causes
- Decide actions: pick 1-3 specific improvements to try next sprint
- Close: thank people for honest feedback
Facilitation tips:
- Create psychological safety. People must feel safe to be honest.
- Focus on systems and processes, not individuals.
- Limit to 1-3 action items. More than that and nothing changes.
- Follow up on previous retro action items. If you never follow up, people stop engaging.
- Vary the retro format occasionally to prevent staleness.
Stakeholder Review / Demo
Purpose: Show progress, gather feedback, build alignment. Format:
- Context: remind stakeholders of the goal and what they saw last time
- Demo: show what was built. Use real product, not slides.
- Metrics: share any early data or feedback
- Feedback: structured time for questions and input
- Next steps: what is coming next and when the next review will be
Facilitation tips:
- Demo the real product whenever possible. Slides are not demos.
- Frame feedback collection: "What feedback do you have on X?" is better than "Any thoughts?"
- Capture feedback visibly and commit to addressing it (or explaining why not)
- Set expectations about what kind of feedback is actionable at this stage
How to use stakeholder-comms on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add stakeholder-comms
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches stakeholder-comms from GitHub repository anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate stakeholder-comms. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /stakeholder-comms) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★57 reviews- ★★★★★Soo Taylor· Dec 28, 2024
Useful defaults in stakeholder-comms — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ren Brown· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: stakeholder-comms is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Luis Ghosh· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for stakeholder-comms matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Tariq Brown· Dec 16, 2024
stakeholder-comms has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Park· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend stakeholder-comms for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: stakeholder-comms is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Jain· Nov 19, 2024
stakeholder-comms is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Soo Brown· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend stakeholder-comms for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Zara Wang· Nov 7, 2024
stakeholder-comms fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Chen· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: stakeholder-comms is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 57