If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionmetrics-reviewExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches metrics-review from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate metrics-review. Access via /metrics-review in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
/metrics-review $ARGUMENTS
If ~~product analytics is connected:
If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:
Ask the user:
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
For each key metric:
Identify correlations:
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
For each metric worth discussing:
What is going well:
What needs attention:
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
After generating the review:
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
Examples by product type:
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?
Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?
Engagement: Are active users getting value?
Retention: Are users coming back?
Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?
Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?
Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:
What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.
Key decisions:
How to use them:
What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?
Common retention timeframes:
How to use retention:
What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.
Common conversion funnels:
How to use conversion:
What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.
Defining activation:
How to use activation:
Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.
Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.
Example:
Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows
Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rate
Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
What to review:
Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.
Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.
What to review:
Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.
Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter. Duration: 60-90 minutes. Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.
What to review:
Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.
A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.
Principles:
Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.
Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.
Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.
Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.
Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.
Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.
Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:
Alert hygiene:
Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
Keeps context tight: metrics-review is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
metrics-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
We added metrics-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
metrics-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in metrics-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
metrics-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: metrics-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Useful defaults in metrics-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
metrics-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for metrics-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 34