cookbook-audit

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-cookbooks --skill cookbook-audit
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Review the requested Cookbook notebook using the guidelines and rubrics in style_guide.md. Provide a score based on scoring guidelines and recommendations on improving the cookbook.

skill.md

Cookbook Audit

Instructions

Review the requested Cookbook notebook using the guidelines and rubrics in style_guide.md. Provide a score based on scoring guidelines and recommendations on improving the cookbook.

The style guide provides detailed templates and examples for:

  • Problem-focused introductions with Terminal Learning Objectives (TLOs) and Enabling Learning Objectives (ELOs)
  • Prerequisites and setup patterns
  • Core content structure
  • Conclusions that map back to learning objectives

IMPORTANT: Always read style_guide.md first before conducting an audit. The style guide contains the canonical templates and good/bad examples to reference.

Workflow

Follow these steps for a comprehensive audit:

  1. Read the style guide: First review style_guide.md to understand current best practices
  2. Identify the notebook: Ask user for path if not provided
  3. Run automated checks: Use python3 validate_notebook.py <path> to catch technical issues and generate markdown
    • The script automatically runs detect-secrets to scan for hardcoded API keys and credentials
    • Uses custom patterns defined in scripts/detect-secrets/plugins.py
    • Checks against baseline at scripts/detect-secrets/.secrets.baseline
  4. Review markdown output: The script generates a markdown file in the tmp/ folder for easier review (saves context vs raw .ipynb)
    • The tmp/ folder is gitignored to avoid committing review artifacts
    • Markdown includes code cells but excludes outputs for cleaner review
  5. Manual review: Read through the markdown version evaluating against style guide and rubric
  6. Score each dimension: Apply scoring guidelines objectively
  7. Generate report: Follow the audit report format below
  8. Provide specific examples: Show concrete improvements with line references using the style guide templates

Audit Report Format

Present your audit using this structure:

Executive Summary

  • Overall Score: X/20
  • Key Strengths (2-3 bullet points)
  • Critical Issues (2-3 bullet points)

Detailed Scoring

1. Narrative Quality: X/5

[Brief justification with specific examples]

2. Code Quality: X/5

[Brief justification with specific examples]

3. Technical Accuracy: X/5

[Brief justification with specific examples]

4. Actionability & Understanding: X/5

[Brief justification with specific examples]

Specific Recommendations

[Prioritized, actionable list of improvements with references to specific sections]

Examples & Suggestions

[Show specific excerpts from the notebook with concrete suggestions for improvement]

Quick Reference Checklist

Use this to ensure comprehensive coverage:

Introduction (See style_guide.md Section 1)

  • Hooks with the problem being solved (1-2 sentences)
  • Explains why it matters (1-2 sentences)
  • Lists learning objectives as bullet points (2-4 TLOs/ELOs)
  • Focuses on value delivered, not machinery built
  • Optional: mentions broader applications (1 sentence)

Prerequisites & Setup (See style_guide.md Section 2)

  • Lists required knowledge clearly
  • Lists required tools (Python version, API keys)
  • Mentions recommended background if applicable
  • Uses %%capture for pip install to suppress output
  • Uses dotenv.load_dotenv() not os.environ
  • Defines MODEL constant at top
  • Groups related installs in single command

Structure & Organization

  • Has logical section progression
  • Each section teaches through demonstration
  • Code blocks have explanatory text before them
  • Includes what we learned after code blocks
  • Uses headers to break up sections

Conclusion (See style_guide.md Section 4)

  • Maps back to learning objectives
  • Summarizes what was accomplished
  • Suggests ways to apply lessons to user's context
  • Points to next steps or related resources

Code Quality

  • All code blocks have explanatory text before them
  • No hardcoded API keys (automatically checked by detect-secrets)
  • Meaningful variable names
  • Comments explain "why" not "what"
  • Follows language best practices
  • Model name defined as constant at top of notebook

Output Management

  • pip install logs suppressed with %%capture
  • No verbose debug output
  • Shows relevant API responses
  • Stack traces only when demonstrating error handling

Content Quality

  • Explains why approaches work
  • Discusses when to use this approach
  • Mentions limitations/considerations
  • Provides transferable knowledge
  • Appropriate model selection

Technical Requirements

  • Executable without modification (except API keys)
  • Uses non-deprecated API patterns
  • Uses valid model names (claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-haiku-4-5, claude-opus-4-6)
  • Uses non-dated model aliases (never dated IDs like claude-sonnet-4-6-20250514)
  • Model name defined as constant at top of notebook
  • Includes dependency specifications
  • Assigned to primary category
  • Has relevant tags

Content Philosophy: Action + Understanding

Cookbooks are primarily action-oriented but strategically incorporate understanding and informed by Diataxis framework.

Core Principles:

  • Practical focus: Show users how to accomplish specific tasks with working code
  • Problem-first framing: Lead with the problem being solved and value delivered, not the machinery
  • Builder's perspective: Written from the user's point of view, solving real problems
  • Agency-building: Help users understand why approaches work, not just how
  • Transferable knowledge: Teach patterns and principles that apply beyond the specific example
  • Critical thinking: Encourage users to question outputs, recognize limitations, make informed choices
  • Learning contracts: State learning objectives upfront, then map back to them in conclusions

What Makes a Good Cookbook

A good cookbook doesn't just help users solve today's problem, it also helps them understand the underlying principles behind the solutions, encouraging them to recognize when and how to adapt approaches. Users will be able to make more informed decisions about AI system design, develop judgement about model outputs, and build skills that transfer to future AI systems.

What Cookbooks Are NOT

Cookbooks are not pure tutorials: We assume users have basic technical skills and API familiarity. We clearly state prerequisites in our cookbooks, and direct users to the Academy to learn more on topics. They are not comprehensive explanations: We don't teach transformer architecture or probability theory. We need to understand that our users are following our cookbooks to solve problems they are facing today. They are busy, in the midst of learning or building, and want to be able to use what they learn to solve their immediate needs. Cookbooks are not reference docs: We don't exhaustively document every parameter, we link to appropriate resources in our documentation as needed. Cookbooks are not simple tips and tricks: We don't teach "hacks" that only work for the current model generation. We don't over-promise and under-deliver. Cookbooks are not production-ready code: They showcase use cases and capabilities, not production patterns. Excessive error handling is not required.

Style Guidelines

Voice & Tone

  • Educational and agency-building
  • Professional but approachable
  • Respectful of user intelligence and time
  • Either second person ("you") or first person plural ("we") - be consistent within a notebook

Writing Quality

  • Clear, concise explanations
  • Active voice preferred
  • Short paragraphs (3-5 sentences)
  • Avoid jargon without definition
  • Use headers to break up sections

Code Presentation

  • Always explain before showing: Every code block should be preceded by explanatory text
  • Explain after running: Include what we learned after code blocks execute
  • Comments explain why, not what: Use meaningful variable names
  • Use constants: Define MODEL as a constant at the top
  • Good habits: Use dotenv.load_dotenv() instead of os.environ

Output Handling

Remove extraneous output with %%capture:

  • pip install logs (always suppress these)
  • Verbose debug statements
  • Lengthy stack traces (unless demonstrating error handling)

Show relevant output:

  • API responses that demonstrate functionality
  • Examples of successful execution

Structural Requirements

See style_guide.md for detailed templates and examples

1. Introduction (Required)

Must include:

  • Problem hook (1-2 sentences): What problem are we solving?
  • Why it matters (1-2 sentences): Why is this important?
  • Learning objectives (2-4 bullet points): "By the end of this cookbook, you'll be able to..."
    • Use action verbs (Build, Implement, Deploy, etc.)
    • Be specific about capabilities
    • Include context/constraints
  • Optional: Broader applications (1 sentence)

Avoid: Leading with machinery ("We will build a research agent...") ✅ Do: Lead with problem/value ("Your team spends hours triaging CI failures...")

2. Prerequisites & Setup (Required)

Must include:

  • Required Knowledge: Technical skills needed
  • Required Tools: Python version, API keys with links
  • Recommended: Optional background that helps
  • Setup: Step-by-step with explanations
    • Use %%capture for pip installs
    • Use dotenv.load_dotenv() not os.environ
    • Define MODEL constant at top

3. Main Content (Required)

Organized by logical steps or phases, each with:

  • Clear section headers
  • Explanatory text before code blocks (what we're about to do)
  • Code examples
  • Explanatory text after code blocks (what we learned)
  • Expected outputs (where relevant)
  • Optional: Understanding callouts (why it works, when to use, limitations)

4. Conclusion (Recommended)

Must include:

  • Recap: Map back to learning objectives
  • What was accomplished: Summary of key points
  • Application guidance: How to apply lessons to user's context
  • Next steps: Related resources or ideas to pursue

Avoid: Generic summaries ("We've demonstrated how the SDK enables...") ✅ Do: Actionable guidance ("Consider applying this to X... Next, try Y...")

Optional Sections

  • How It Works: Brief explanation of underlying mechanism
  • When to Use This: Appropriate use cases and contexts
  • Limitations & Considerations: Caveats, failure modes, constraints
  • Troubleshooting: Common issues and solutions
  • Variations: Alternative approaches or extensions
  • Performance Notes: Optimization considerations
  • Further Reading: Links to relevant docs, papers, or deeper explanations

Common Anti-Patterns to Flag

Refer to style_guide.md for detailed good/bad examples. Watch for these issues:

Introduction Anti-Patterns

❌ Leading with machinery: "We will build a research agent using the Claude SDK..." ❌ Feature dumps: Listing SDK methods or tool capabilities ❌ Vague learning objectives: "Learn about agents" or "Understand the API" ✅ Problem-first framing with specific, actionable learning objectives

Setup Anti-Patterns

❌ Noisy pip install output without %%capture ❌ Multiple separate pip install commands ❌ Using os.environ["API_KEY"] = "your_key" instead of dotenv ❌ Hardcoding model names throughout instead of using a MODEL constant ✅ Clean setup with grouped installs, dotenv, and constants

Code Presentation Anti-Patterns

❌ Code blocks without explanatory text before them ❌ No explanation of what we learned after running code ❌ Comments that explain "what" the code does (code should be self-documenting) ❌ Over-explaining obvious code ✅ Context before code, insights after code, comments explain "why"

Conclusion Anti-Patterns

❌ Generic summaries: "We've demonstrated how the SDK enables..." ❌ Simply restating what the notebook did without guidance ❌ Not mapping back to the stated learning objectives ✅ Actionable guidance on applying lessons to user's specific context

how to use cookbook-audit

How to use cookbook-audit on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add cookbook-audit
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-cookbooks --skill cookbook-audit

The skills CLI fetches cookbook-audit from GitHub repository anthropics/claude-cookbooks and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/cookbook-audit

Reload or restart Cursor to activate cookbook-audit. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /cookbook-audit) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.660 reviews
  • Nikhil Anderson· Dec 28, 2024

    Registry listing for cookbook-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Aditi Gill· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in cookbook-audit — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Ishan Abbas· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in cookbook-audit — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for cookbook-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Amelia Choi· Nov 15, 2024

    I recommend cookbook-audit for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Kabir Mensah· Nov 15, 2024

    I recommend cookbook-audit for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Amelia Thomas· Oct 6, 2024

    cookbook-audit reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kabir Kim· Oct 6, 2024

    cookbook-audit reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Li Abebe· Sep 21, 2024

    cookbook-audit fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Kabir Chawla· Sep 13, 2024

    cookbook-audit is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 60

1 / 6