tdd-test-writer▌
am-will/codex-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Writes failing tests first, establishing a strict implementation contract for test-driven development.
- ›Completes the RED phase of TDD by authoring behavior-focused tests that fail for the right reason, then hands off to implementation agents with objective pass criteria
- ›Delegates test authoring to a tdd_test_writer subagent when available, ensuring tests remain unmodified during implementation
- ›Detects existing test frameworks and conventions (pytest, jest, vitest, go test, cargo test
TDD Test Writer
Use this skill to complete the RED phase of TDD: define behavior with tests first, verify they fail for the right reason, then hand off implementation with objective pass criteria.
When To Use
Use this skill when the user asks for:
- test-first development
- TDD / RED-GREEN-REFACTOR workflow
- writing tests that implementation agents must satisfy
- bugfixes that need regression tests before code changes
Required Rules
- Do not modify production code while running this skill.
- Use subagent role
tdd_test_writerfor RED-phase test authoring whenever available. - Write behavior-focused tests, not placeholders.
- Every new/updated test must fail before handoff.
- Failures must come from missing or incorrect production behavior, not broken tests.
- Prefer deterministic, targeted test commands over full-suite runs when possible.
- For bugfix tasks, add a regression test that captures the reported failure mode.
Workflow
1. Define Behavior Contract
- Convert user request into explicit acceptance criteria.
- Identify happy path, edge cases, and negative-path expectations.
- If requirements are ambiguous, record
ASSUMPTION:lines in output.
2. Delegate Test Authoring To tdd_test_writer
- Spawn a
tdd_test_writersubagent with task scope, target files, and acceptance criteria. - Require the subagent to write/update tests only (no production code changes).
- Require command output proving RED-state failure for the new tests.
- If
tdd_test_writeris unavailable, continue directly and noteFALLBACK: tdd_test_writer unavailable.
3. Discover Existing Test Conventions
- Detect framework and runner from the repo (for example
vitest,jest,pytest,go test,cargo test). - Follow existing directory, naming, and fixture conventions.
- Reuse existing helpers instead of introducing duplicate test utilities.
4. Author RED-Phase Tests
- Create or update test files that encode the behavior contract.
- Keep tests small and intention-revealing (clear names and assertions).
- Include at least one negative-path assertion where applicable.
- Avoid network/time randomness; mock or fixture external systems.
5. Verify RED State
- Run the narrowest command that executes the new tests.
- Confirm they fail for the expected behavioral gap.
- If failure is caused by test syntax/setup, fix tests and rerun.
6. Produce Implementation Handoff
Return a block that implementation agents must follow. The handoff must include:
- subagent used (
tdd_test_writer) or explicit fallback reason - exact test files created/updated
- exact verification command(s)
- short failure summary proving RED state
- immutable test constraint (do not edit tests unless requirement changes)
- pass criteria that define task completion
Required Output Format
TDD RED PHASE COMPLETE
## Authoring Mode
- Subagent: tdd_test_writer
- Fallback: [only if subagent unavailable]
## Test Files
- [path]
## Verification
- Command: [exact command]
- Result: FAIL (expected)
- Failure reason: [1-2 lines tied to missing behavior]
## Implementation Contract (for next agent)
1. Do not modify these tests: [paths]
2. Implement production changes only in: [paths or modules]
3. Completion gate: [exact command] passes with no test weakening.
4. Run broader safety check: [secondary command]
5. Return evidence: changed files + command output summary.
## Assumptions
- ASSUMPTION: [only if needed]
Quality Bar
- Tests fail before implementation and are reproducible locally.
- Assertions are specific enough to prevent false positives.
- Regression coverage is present for bugfix-driven tasks.
- Handoff is precise enough that another agent can execute without clarifications.
How to use tdd-test-writer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tdd-test-writer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches tdd-test-writer from GitHub repository am-will/codex-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate tdd-test-writer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tdd-test-writer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★50 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: tdd-test-writer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Alexander Abbas· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for tdd-test-writer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aanya Flores· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in tdd-test-writer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Aanya Farah· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for tdd-test-writer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 7, 2024
We added tdd-test-writer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Amelia Abebe· Nov 7, 2024
Useful defaults in tdd-test-writer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 26, 2024
tdd-test-writer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Hassan Yang· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend tdd-test-writer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Choi· Oct 18, 2024
tdd-test-writer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Hassan Brown· Sep 25, 2024
Useful defaults in tdd-test-writer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 50