accessibility-compliance▌
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · updated Apr 18, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Implement comprehensive accessibility features following WCAG guidelines to ensure your application is usable by everyone, including people with disabilities.
Accessibility Compliance
Table of Contents
Overview
Implement comprehensive accessibility features following WCAG guidelines to ensure your application is usable by everyone, including people with disabilities.
When to Use
- Building public-facing web applications
- Ensuring WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA or AAA compliance
- Supporting screen readers (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver)
- Implementing keyboard-only navigation
- Meeting ADA, Section 508, or similar regulations
- Improving SEO and overall user experience
- Conducting accessibility audits
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
<!-- Bad: Non-semantic markup -->
<div class="button" onclick="submit()">Submit</div>
<!-- Good: Semantic HTML -->
<button type="submit" aria-label="Submit form">Submit</button>
<!-- Custom components with proper ARIA -->
<div
role="button"
tabindex="0"
aria-pressed="false"
onclick="toggle()"
onkeydown="handleKeyPress(event)"
>
Toggle Feature
</div>
<!-- Form with proper labels and error handling -->
<form>
<label for="email">Email Address</label>
<input
id="email"
type="email"
name="email"
aria-required="true"
// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| Semantic HTML with ARIA | Semantic HTML with ARIA |
| React Component with Accessibility | React Component with Accessibility |
| Keyboard Navigation Handler | Keyboard Navigation Handler |
| Color Contrast Validator | Color Contrast Validator |
| Screen Reader Announcements | Screen Reader Announcements |
| Focus Management | Focus Management |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Use semantic HTML elements
- Provide text alternatives for images
- Ensure sufficient color contrast (4.5:1 minimum)
- Support keyboard navigation
- Implement focus management
- Test with screen readers
- Use ARIA attributes correctly
- Provide skip links
- Make forms accessible with labels
- Support text resizing up to 200%
❌ DON'T
- Rely solely on color to convey information
- Remove focus indicators
- Use only mouse/touch interactions
- Auto-play media without controls
- Create keyboard traps
- Use positive tabindex values
- Override user preferences
- Hide content only visually that should be hidden from screen readers
How to use accessibility-compliance on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add accessibility-compliance
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches accessibility-compliance from GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate accessibility-compliance. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /accessibility-compliance) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★52 reviews- ★★★★★Omar Nasser· Dec 28, 2024
accessibility-compliance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Henry Srinivasan· Dec 28, 2024
accessibility-compliance reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Henry Iyer· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend accessibility-compliance for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Liam Mehta· Nov 19, 2024
accessibility-compliance reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Hana Smith· Nov 19, 2024
accessibility-compliance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Arya Patel· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: accessibility-compliance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Emma Torres· Oct 26, 2024
accessibility-compliance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Liam Huang· Oct 10, 2024
Registry listing for accessibility-compliance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Mia Lopez· Oct 10, 2024
Keeps context tight: accessibility-compliance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Michael Garcia· Sep 17, 2024
accessibility-compliance fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 52