Idiomatic Perl 5.36+ patterns and best practices for building robust, maintainable applications.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperl-patternsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches perl-patterns from affaan-m/everything-claude-code and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate perl-patterns. Access via /perl-patterns in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
142.9K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
142.9K
stars
Idiomatic Perl 5.36+ patterns and best practices for building robust, maintainable applications.
Apply these patterns as a bias toward modern Perl 5.36+ defaults: signatures, explicit modules, focused error handling, and testable boundaries. The examples below are meant to be copied as starting points, then tightened for the actual app, dependency stack, and deployment model in front of you.
v5.36 PragmaA single use v5.36 replaces the old boilerplate and enables strict, warnings, and subroutine signatures.
# Good: Modern preamble
use v5.36;
sub greet($name) {
say "Hello, $name!";
}
# Bad: Legacy boilerplate
use strict;
use warnings;
use feature 'say', 'signatures';
no warnings 'experimental::signatures';
sub greet {
my ($name) = @_;
say "Hello, $name!";
}
Use signatures for clarity and automatic arity checking.
use v5.36;
# Good: Signatures with defaults
sub connect_db($host, $port = 5432, $timeout = 30) {
# $host is required, others have defaults
return DBI->connect("dbi:Pg:host=$host;port=$port", undef, undef, {
RaiseError => 1,
PrintError => 0,
});
}
# Good: Slurpy parameter for variable args
sub log_message($level, @details) {
say "[$level] " . join(' ', @details);
}
# Bad: Manual argument unpacking
sub connect_db {
my ($host, $port, $timeout) = @_;
$port //= 5432;
$timeout //= 30;
# ...
}
Understand scalar vs list context — a core Perl concept.
use v5.36;
my @items = (1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
my @copy = @items; # List context: all elements
my $count = @items; # Scalar context: count (5)
say "Items: " . scalar @items; # Force scalar context
Use postfix dereference syntax for readability with nested structures.
use v5.36;
my $data = {
users => [
{ name => 'Alice', roles => ['admin', 'user'] },
{ name => 'Bob', roles => ['user'] },
],
};
# Good: Postfix dereferencing
my @users = $data->{users}->@*;
my @roles = $data->{users}[0]{roles}->@*;
my %first = $data->{users}[0]->%*;
# Bad: Circumfix dereferencing (harder to read in chains)
my @users = @{ $data->{users} };
my @roles = @{ $data->{users}[0]{roles} };
isa Operator (5.32+)Infix type-check — replaces blessed($o) && $o->isa('X').
use v5.36;
if ($obj isa 'My::Class') { $obj->do_something }
use v5.36;
sub parse_config($path) {
my $content = eval { path($path)->slurp_utf8 };
die "Config error: $@" if $@;
return decode_json($content);
}
use v5.36;
use Try::Tiny;
sub fetch_user($id) {
my $user = try {
$db->resultset('User')->find($id)
// die "User $id not found\n";
}
catch {
warn "Failed to fetch user $id: $_";
undef;
};
return $user;
}
use v5.40;
sub divide($x, $y) {
try {
die "Division by zero" if $y == 0;
return $x / $y;
}
catch ($e) {
warn "Error: $e";
return;
}
}
Prefer Moo for lightweight, modern OO. Use Moose only when its metaprotocol is needed.
# Good: Moo class
package User;
use Moo;
use Types::Standard qw(Str Int ArrayRef);
use namespace::autoclean;
has name => (is => 'ro', isa => Str, required => 1);
has email => (is => 'ro', isa => Str, required => 1);
has age => (is => 'ro', isa => Int, default => sub { 0 });
has roles => ✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
708mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
218parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
165cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
145ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
141pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorynutritional-specialist
141ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.8★★★★★38 reviews- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
perl-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- IIsabella Smith★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: perl-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: perl-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- IIsabella Verma★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
I recommend perl-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- SSakshi Patil★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
We added perl-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- SSoo Ndlovu★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: perl-patterns is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- CCharlotte Huang★★★★★Nov 7, 2024
We added perl-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- BBenjamin Mehta★★★★★Oct 26, 2024
perl-patterns fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- CChaitanya Patil★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
perl-patterns fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- IIsabella Menon★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
perl-patterns is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 38
1 / 4Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.