Version: 2.0.0 | Last Updated: 2025-01-22
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionrust-routerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches rust-router from actionbook/rust-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate rust-router. Access via /rust-router in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
974
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
974
stars
Version: 2.0.0 | Last Updated: 2025-01-22
v2.0: Context optimized - detailed examples moved to sub-files
Don't answer directly. Trace through the cognitive layers first.
Layer 3: Domain Constraints (WHY)
├── Business rules, regulatory requirements
├── domain-fintech, domain-web, domain-cli, etc.
└── "Why is it designed this way?"
Layer 2: Design Choices (WHAT)
├── Architecture patterns, DDD concepts
├── m09-m15 skills
└── "What pattern should I use?"
Layer 1: Language Mechanics (HOW)
├── Ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, traits
├── m01-m07 skills
└── "How do I implement this in Rust?"
| User Signal | Entry Layer | Direction | First Skill |
|---|---|---|---|
| E0xxx error | Layer 1 | Trace UP ↑ | m01-m07 |
| Compile error | Layer 1 | Trace UP ↑ | Error table below |
| "How to design..." | Layer 2 | Check L3, then DOWN ↓ | m09-domain |
| "Building [domain] app" | Layer 3 | Trace DOWN ↓ | domain-* |
| "Best practice..." | Layer 2 | Both directions | m09-m15 |
| Performance issue | Layer 1 → 2 | UP then DOWN | m10-performance |
When domain keywords are present, you MUST load BOTH skills:
| Domain Keywords | L1 Skill | L3 Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Web API, HTTP, axum, handler | m07-concurrency | domain-web |
| 交易, 支付, trading, payment | m01-ownership | domain-fintech |
| CLI, terminal, clap | m07-concurrency | domain-cli |
| kubernetes, grpc, microservice | m07-concurrency | domain-cloud-native |
| embedded, no_std, MCU | m02-resource | domain-embedded |
BEFORE answering, check if negotiation is required:
| Query Contains | Action |
|---|---|
| "比较", "对比", "compare", "vs", "versus" | MUST use negotiation |
| "最佳实践", "best practice" | MUST use negotiation |
| Domain + error (e.g., "交易系统 E0382") | MUST use negotiation |
| Ambiguous scope (e.g., "tokio 性能") | SHOULD use negotiation |
When negotiation is required, include:
## Negotiation Analysis
**Query Type:** [Comparative | Cross-domain | Synthesis | Ambiguous]
**Negotiation:** Enabled
### Source: [Agent/Skill Name]
**Confidence:** HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | UNCERTAIN
**Gaps:** [What's missing]
## Synthesized Answer
[Answer]
**Overall Confidence:** [Level]
**Disclosed Gaps:** [Gaps user should know]
详细协议见:
patterns/negotiation.md
When creating new Rust projects or Cargo.toml files, ALWAYS use:
[package]
edition = "2024" # ALWAYS use latest stable edition
rust-version = "1.85"
[lints.rust]
unsafe_code = "warn"
[lints.clippy]
all = "warn"
pedantic = "warn"
| Pattern | Route To |
|---|---|
| move, borrow, lifetime, E0382, E0597 | m01-ownership |
| Box, Rc, Arc, RefCell, Cell | m02-resource |
| mut, interior mutability, E0499, E0502, E0596 | m03-mutability |
| generic, trait, inline, monomorphization | m04-zero-cost |
| type state, phantom, newtype | m05-type-driven |
| Result, Error, panic, ?, anyhow, thiserror | m06-error-handling |
| Send, Sync, thread, async, channel | m07-concurrency |
| unsafe, FFI, extern, raw pointer, transmute | unsafe-checker |
| Pattern | Route To |
|---|---|
| domain model, business logic | m09-domain |
| performance, optimization, benchmark | m10-performance |
| integration, interop, bindings | m11-ecosystem |
| resource lifecycle, RAII, Drop | m12-lifecycle |
| domain error, recovery strategy | m13-domain-error |
| mental model, how to think | m14-mental-model |
| anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall | m15-anti-pattern |
| Domain Keywords | Route To |
|---|---|
| fintech, trading, decimal, currency | domain-fintech |
| ml, tensor, model, inference | domain-ml |
| kubernetes, docker, grpc, microservice | domain-cloud-native |
| embedded, sensor, mqtt, iot | domain-iot |
| web server, HTTP, REST, axum, actix | domain-web |
| CLI, command line, clap, terminal | domain-cli |
| no_std, microcontroller, firmware | domain-embedded |
| Error Code | Route To | Common Cause |
|---|---|---|
| E0382 | m01-ownership | Use of moved value |
| E0597 | m01-ownership | Lifetime too short |
| E0506 | m01-ownership | Cannot assign to borrowed |
| E0507 | m01-ownership | Cannot move out of borrowed |
| E0515 | m01-ownership | Return local reference |
| E0716 | m01-ownership | Temporary value dropped |
| E0106 | m01-ownership | Missing lifetime specifier |
| E0596 | m03-mutability | Cannot borrow as mutable |
| E0499 | m03-mutability | Multiple mutable borrows |
| E0502 | m03-mutability | Borrow conflict |
| E0277 | m04/m07 | Trait bound not satisfied |
| E0308 | m04-zero-cost | Type mismatch |
| E0599 | m04-zero-cost | No method found |
| E0038 | m04-zero-cost | Trait not object-safe |
| E0433 | m11-ecosystem | Cannot find crate/module |
| Pattern | Route To | Action |
|---|---|---|
| latest version, what's new | rust-learner | Use agents |
| API, docs, documentation | docs-researcher | Use agent |
| code style, naming, clippy | coding-guidelines | Read skill |
| unsafe code, FFI | unsafe-checker | Read skill |
| code review | os-checker | See integrations/os-checker.md |
| Keyword | Resolution |
|---|---|
unsafe |
unsafe-checker (more specific than m11) |
error |
m06 for general, m13 for domain-specific |
RAII |
m12 for design, m01 for implementation |
crate |
rust-learner for version, m11 for integration |
tokio |
tokio-* for API, m07 for concepts |
Priority Hierarchy:
1. Error codes (E0xxx) → Direct lookup, highest priority
2. Negotiation triggers (compare, vs, best practice) → Enable negotiation
3. Domain keywords + error → Load BOTH domain + error skills
4. Specific crate keywords → Route to crate-specific skill if exists
5. General concept keywords → Route to meta-question skill
| File | Content |
|---|---|
patterns/negotiation.md |
Negotiation protocol details |
examples/workflow.md |
Workflow examples |
integrations/os-checker.md |
OS-Checker integration |
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
jwynia/agent-skills
mindrally/skills
github/awesome-copilot
kostja94/marketing-skills
wispbit-ai/skills
shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
We added rust-router from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
We added rust-router from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: rust-router is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
rust-router is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
rust-router fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
rust-router fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
rust-router fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
rust-router is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in rust-router — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
rust-router fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 43