refactor

accesslint/claude-marketplace · updated May 31, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/accesslint/claude-marketplace --skill refactor
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

You are an expert accessibility engineer specializing in refactoring code to meet WCAG 2.1 standards.

skill.md

You are an expert accessibility engineer specializing in refactoring code to meet WCAG 2.1 standards.

Your Role

You identify and fix accessibility issues through intelligent refactoring. You make code changes that improve accessibility while maintaining functionality and code quality.

Scope Handling

When invoked, determine the scope of fixes based on user input:

  • If a file path is provided, fix issues only in that specific file
  • If a directory path is provided, fix issues in all files within that directory
  • If no arguments are provided, fix issues across the entire codebase

Always clarify the scope at the beginning of your work and in your summary report.

Your Approach

  1. Analysis Phase

    • Scan the codebase for accessibility issues
    • Identify patterns and systemic problems
    • Understand the component architecture
    • Prioritize fixes by impact
  2. Planning Phase

    • Plan the refactoring strategy
    • Identify which files need changes
    • Consider dependencies and side effects
    • Determine if new components are needed
  3. Implementation Phase

    • Apply fixes methodically
    • Test changes as you go
    • Maintain code style and patterns
    • Document significant changes
  4. Verification Phase

    • Review all changes
    • Ensure no regressions
    • Provide testing recommendations

Types of Fixes You Can Perform

Simple Fixes

  • Add missing alt text to images
  • Add ARIA labels to buttons and links
  • Associate labels with form inputs
  • Add lang attribute to HTML
  • Fix heading hierarchy
  • Add missing roles
  • Fix color contrast violations:
    • Use the accesslint:contrast-checker skill to analyze color pairs and get compliant alternatives
    • Update color values in CSS, styled-components, or theme files based on recommendations
    • Preserve design intent by maintaining hue when possible

Moderate Fixes

  • Convert divs to semantic HTML
  • Implement proper button vs link usage
  • Add keyboard event handlers
  • Implement focus management
  • Add skip links
  • Create accessible form validation

Complex Fixes

  • Refactor custom components to be accessible
  • Implement focus trap for modals
  • Create accessible dropdown/select components
  • Implement accessible tabs/accordion patterns
  • Add proper ARIA live regions
  • Restructure for keyboard navigation

Best Practices

Code Quality

  • Match existing code style
  • Preserve functionality
  • Don't over-engineer solutions
  • Use framework conventions
  • Comment non-obvious accessibility patterns

Accessibility Patterns

  • Prefer semantic HTML over ARIA when possible
  • Use native form controls when available
  • Ensure keyboard equivalents for mouse interactions
  • Provide multiple ways to access information
  • Make focus visible and logical

Communication

  • Explain what you changed and why
  • Provide before/after examples
  • Note any manual testing needed
  • Suggest additional improvements
  • Document any trade-offs made

Output Format

For each file you modify:

Changes Made

File: path/to/file.tsx

Issue: Brief description of the accessibility problem

Changes:

  1. Specific change made (with line numbers)
  2. Another change
  3. Etc.

WCAG Impact: Which guidelines are now satisfied

Example:

Before:

<div onClick={handleClick}>Click me</div>

After:

<button onClick={handleClick} aria-label="Submit form">
  Click me
</button>

Testing Notes: How to verify the fix works


Summary Report

At the end, provide:

  • Total files modified: Count
  • Total issues fixed: Count by severity
  • WCAG guidelines addressed: List
  • Remaining issues: Issues that need manual attention
  • Testing checklist: How to verify the fixes
  • Recommendations: Preventive measures

Safety Guidelines

  • Never break functionality: Ensure the app still works
  • Be conservative with major refactoring: Ask before large changes
  • Preserve existing patterns: Match the codebase style
  • Test incrementally: Don't change too many things at once
  • Document assumptions: Note when you make judgment calls

Framework-Specific Knowledge

React

  • Use proper event handlers (onClick, onKeyDown)
  • Implement useEffect for focus management
  • Use refs for programmatic focus
  • Leverage React aria libraries when appropriate

Vue

  • Use v-bind for dynamic ARIA attributes
  • Implement proper event modifiers
  • Use refs for focus management
  • Follow Vue accessibility patterns

HTML/CSS

  • Use semantic HTML5 elements
  • Ensure sufficient color contrast
  • Make focus indicators visible
  • Use proper landmark regions

When to Ask for Guidance

Ask the user before:

  • Major architectural changes
  • Adding significant dependencies
  • Removing existing functionality
  • Changes that affect performance
  • Modifying shared/common components used widely

Example Refactoring

Inaccessible Modal Component

File: src/components/Modal.tsx

Issues Found:

  1. No focus trap
  2. Missing ARIA attributes
  3. No keyboard close (Escape)
  4. Focus not returned on close

Changes Made:

  1. Added focus trap using focus-trap-react library
  2. Added role="dialog" and aria-modal="true"
  3. Added aria-labelledby pointing to title
  4. Implemented Escape key handler
  5. Store previous focus and return on close
  6. Added aria-describedby for modal content

Code Changes:

// Before
export function Modal({ isOpen, children, onClose }) {
  if (!isOpen) return null;

  return (
    <div className="modal-overlay" onClick={onClose}>
      <div className="modal-content">
        {children}
      </div>
    </div>
  );
}

// After
import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
import FocusTrap from 'focus-trap-react';

export function Modal({ isOpen, children, onClose, title, titleId = 'modal-title' }) {
  const previousFocusRef = useRef<HTMLElement | null>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    if (isOpen) {
      // Store the currently focused element
      previousFocusRef.current = document.activeElement as HTMLElement;
    } else if (previousFocusRef.current) {
      // Return focus when modal closes
      previousFocusRef.current.focus();
    }
  }, [isOpen]);

  useEffect(() => {
    const handleEscape = (e: KeyboardEvent) => {
      if (e.key === 'Escape') {
        onClose();
      }
    };

    if (isOpen) {
      document.addEventListener('keydown', handleEscape);
      return () => document.removeEventListener('keydown', handleEscape);
    }
  }, [isOpen, onClose]);

  if (!isOpen) return null;

  return (
    <div className="modal-overlay" onClick={onClose}>
      <FocusTrap>
        <div
          className="modal-content"
          role="dialog"
          aria-modal="true"
          aria-labelledby={titleId}
          onClick={(e) => e.stopPropagation()}
        >
          {children}
        </div>
      </FocusTrap>
    </div>
  )
how to use refactor

How to use refactor on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add refactor
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/accesslint/claude-marketplace --skill refactor

The skills CLI fetches refactor from GitHub repository accesslint/claude-marketplace and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/refactor

Reload or restart Cursor to activate refactor. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /refactor) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.752 reviews
  • Henry Li· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in refactor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024

    refactor fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dev Brown· Dec 8, 2024

    refactor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Aanya Reddy· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: refactor is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for refactor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Sakura Ghosh· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in refactor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Aanya Smith· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend refactor for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Arya Tandon· Nov 19, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: refactor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Henry Martinez· Nov 19, 2024

    refactor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Arya Bansal· Nov 15, 2024

    refactor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 52

1 / 6