flutter-bloc-development▌
abdelhakrazi/flutter-bloc-clean-architecture-skill · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
This skill enforces BLoC state management, strict layer separation, and mandatory use of design system constants for all Flutter development in this codebase.
Flutter BLoC Development
This skill enforces BLoC state management, strict layer separation, and mandatory use of design system constants for all Flutter development in this codebase.
Decision Tree: Choosing Your Approach
User task → What are they building?
│
├─ New screen/feature → Full feature implementation:
│ 1. Create feature folder (lib/[feature]/)
│ 2. Define BLoC (bloc/[feature]_event.dart, _state.dart, _bloc.dart)
│ 3. Create data layer (data/datasources/, data/repositories/, data/models/)
│ 4. Build UI (view/[feature]_page.dart, view/widgets/)
│ 5. Create barrel files ([feature].dart, data/data.dart, view/view.dart)
│
├─ New widget only → Presentation layer:
│ 1. Feature-specific: feature/view/widgets/
│ 2. Shared/reusable: shared/widgets/
│ 3. Use design system constants (NO hardcoded values)
│ 4. Connect to existing BLoC if needed
│
├─ Data integration → Data layer only:
│ 1. Create datasource (feature/data/datasources/)
│ 2. Create repository (feature/data/repositories/)
│ 3. Wire up in existing or new BLoC
│
└─ Refactoring → Identify violations:
1. Check for hardcoded colors/spacing/typography
2. Check for business logic in UI
3. Check for direct SDK calls outside datasources
4. Check for missing Loading state before async operations
5. Check for missing Equatable on Events/States
6. Check for improper error handling (use SnackBar + AppColors.error)
Architecture at a Glance
Feature-first structure (official BLoC recommendation):
lib/
├── [feature]/ # Feature folder (e.g., earnings/, auth/, trips/)
│ ├── bloc/
│ │ ├── [feature]_bloc.dart
│ │ ├── [feature]_event.dart
│ │ └── [feature]_state.dart
│ ├── data/
│ │ ├── datasources/ # Feature-specific API calls
│ │ ├── repositories/ # Data orchestration
│ │ ├── models/ # Feature-specific DTOs
│ │ └── data.dart # Data layer barrel file
│ ├── view/
│ │ ├── [feature]_page.dart # Main screen
│ │ ├── widgets/ # Feature-specific widgets
│ │ └── view.dart # View barrel file
│ └── [feature].dart # Feature barrel file
├── shared/ # Cross-feature code
│ ├── data/
│ │ ├── datasources/ # Shared API clients (ApiClient, UserDataSource)
│ │ ├── models/ # Shared models (User, ApiResponse)
│ │ └── data.dart # Shared data barrel file
│ ├── widgets/ # Reusable UI components
│ └── utils/ # Design system (colors, spacing, typography)
└── app.dart # App entry point
When to Use Feature vs Shared Data
| Scenario | Location | Example |
|---|---|---|
| API endpoints used by ONE feature | feature/data/ |
EarningsDataSource → /api/earnings/... |
| API client/service used by MANY features | shared/data/ |
ApiClient, UserDataSource |
| Models used by ONE feature | feature/data/models/ |
EarningsSummary |
| Models used by MANY features | shared/data/models/ |
User, ApiResponse |
Barrel Files — Single import per layer:
// Feature barrel: earnings/earnings.dart
export 'bloc/earnings_bloc.dart';
export 'bloc/earnings_event.dart';
export 'bloc/earnings_state.dart';
export 'data/data.dart';
export 'view/view.dart';
// Data layer barrel: earnings/data/data.dart
export 'datasources/earnings_datasource.dart';
export 'repositories/earnings_repository.dart';
export 'models/earnings_summary.dart';
// Shared data barrel: shared/data/data.dart
export 'datasources/api_client.dart';
export 'datasources/user_datasource.dart';
export 'models/user.dart';
Key Rules:
- All state changes flow through BLoC
- No direct backend SDK calls outside datasources
- Zero hardcoded values (colors, spacing, typography)
- Repository pattern for all data access
- Feature-specific code stays in feature folder
- Shared code (used by 2+ features) goes in
shared/
BLoC Implementation
Event → State → BLoC (Three Files Per Feature)
Events — User actions and system triggers:
abstract class FeatureEvent extends Equatable {
const FeatureEvent();
List<Object?> get props => [];
}
class FeatureActionRequested extends FeatureEvent {
final String param;
const FeatureActionRequested({required this.param});
List<Object> get props => [param];
}
States — All possible UI states:
abstract class FeatureState extends Equatable {
const FeatureState();
List<Object?> get props => [];
}
class FeatureInitial extends FeatureState {}
class FeatureLoading extends FeatureState {}
class FeatureSuccess extends FeatureState {
final DataType data;
const FeatureSuccess(this.data);
List<Object> get props => [data];
}
class FeatureError extends FeatureState {
final String message;
const FeatureError(this.message);
List<Object> get props => [message];
}
BLoC — Event handlers with Loading → Success/Error pattern:
class FeatureBloc extends Bloc<FeatureEvent, FeatureState> {
final FeatureRepository _repository;
FeatureBloc({required FeatureRepository repository})
: _repository = repository,
super(FeatureInitial()) {
on<FeatureActionRequested>(_onActionRequested);
}
Future<void> _onActionRequested(
FeatureActionRequested event,
Emitter<FeatureState> emit,
) async {
emit(FeatureLoading());
try {
final result = await _repository.doSomething(event.param);
emit(FeatureSuccess(result));
} catch (e) {
emit(FeatureError(e.toString()));
}
}
}
CRITICAL: Always emit Loading before async work, then Success or Error. Never skip the loading state.
Data Layer
Data Flow:
UI Event → BLoC (emit Loading) → Repository → Datasource (SDK)
↓
Response → Repository (map to entity) → BLoC (emit Success/Error) → UI
Datasource — Backend SDK calls only:
class FeatureDataSource {
final SupabaseClient _supabase;
FeatureDataSource(this._supabase);
Future<Map<String, dynamic>> fetch() async {
return await _supabase.How to use flutter-bloc-development on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add flutter-bloc-development
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches flutter-bloc-development from GitHub repository abdelhakrazi/flutter-bloc-clean-architecture-skill and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate flutter-bloc-development. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /flutter-bloc-development) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★40 reviews- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: flutter-bloc-development is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ira Sethi· Dec 28, 2024
flutter-bloc-development fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kaira Abbas· Dec 20, 2024
flutter-bloc-development has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★William Huang· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for flutter-bloc-development matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Valentina Huang· Nov 19, 2024
flutter-bloc-development is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Kiara Taylor· Nov 3, 2024
Useful defaults in flutter-bloc-development — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Diya Gill· Oct 22, 2024
I recommend flutter-bloc-development for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Aanya Malhotra· Oct 10, 2024
Keeps context tight: flutter-bloc-development is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Naina Chawla· Sep 21, 2024
flutter-bloc-development has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Naina Bhatia· Sep 13, 2024
flutter-bloc-development fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 40