Use this skill when:
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontype-design-performanceExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches type-design-performance from aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate type-design-performance. Access via /type-design-performance in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
735
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
735
stars
Use this skill when:
Sealing classes enables JIT devirtualization and communicates API intent.
// DO: Seal classes not designed for inheritance
public sealed class OrderProcessor
{
public void Process(Order order) { }
}
// DO: Seal records (they're classes)
public sealed record OrderCreated(OrderId Id, CustomerId CustomerId);
// DON'T: Leave unsealed without reason
public class OrderProcessor // Can be subclassed - intentional?
{
public virtual void Process(Order order) { } // Virtual = slower
}
Benefits:
Structs should be readonly when immutable. This prevents defensive copies.
// DO: Readonly struct for immutable value types
public readonly record struct OrderId(Guid Value)
{
public static OrderId New() => new(Guid.NewGuid());
public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}
// DO: Readonly struct for small, short-lived data
public readonly struct Money
{
public decimal Amount { get; }
public string Currency { get; }
public Money(decimal amount, string currency)
{
Amount = amount;
Currency = currency;
}
}
// DON'T: Mutable struct (causes defensive copies)
public struct Point // Not readonly!
{
public int X { get; set; } // Mutable!
public int Y { get; set; }
}
| Use Struct When | Use Class When |
|---|---|
| Small (≤16 bytes typically) | Larger objects |
| Short-lived | Long-lived |
| Frequently allocated | Shared references needed |
| Value semantics required | Identity semantics required |
| Immutable | Mutable state |
Static methods with no side effects are faster and more testable.
// DO: Static pure function
public static class OrderCalculator
{
public static Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
{
var total = items.Sum(i => i.Price * i.Quantity);
return new Money(total, "USD");
}
}
// Usage - predictable, testable
var total = OrderCalculator.CalculateTotal(items);
Benefits:
// DON'T: Instance method hiding dependencies
public class OrderCalculator
{
private readonly ITaxService _taxService; // Hidden dependency
private readonly IDiscountService _discountService; // Hidden dependency
public Money CalculateTotal(IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items)
{
// What does this actually depend on?
}
}
// BETTER: Explicit dependencies via parameters
public static class OrderCalculator
{
public static Money CalculateTotal(
IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> items,
decimal taxRate,
decimal discountPercent)
{
// All inputs visible
}
}
Don't go overboard - Use instance methods when you genuinely need state or polymorphism.
Don't materialize enumerables until necessary. Avoid excessive LINQ chains.
// BAD: Premature materialization
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.ToList() // Materialized!
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt) // Another iteration
.ToList(); // Materialized again!
}
// GOOD: Defer until the end
public IReadOnlyList<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt)
.ToList(); // Single materialization
}
// GOOD: Return IEnumerable if caller might not need all items
public IEnumerable<Order> GetActiveOrders()
{
return _orders
.Where(o => o.IsActive)
.OrderBy(o => o.CreatedAt);
// Caller decides when to materialize
}
Be careful with async and IEnumerable:
// BAD: Async in LINQ - hidden allocations
var results = orders
.Select(async o => await ProcessOrderAsync(o)) // Task per item!
.ToList();
await Task.WhenAll(results);
// GOOD: Use IAsyncEnumerable for streaming
public async IAsyncEnumerable<OrderResult> ProcessOrdersAsync(
IEnumerable<Order> orders,
[EnumeratorCancellation] CancellationToken ct = default)
{
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
frontend-design
669anthropics/claude-code
Frontendtag: designantigravity-design-expert
211sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Frontendtag: designhigh-end-visual-design
193leonxlnx/taste-skill
Frontendtag: designinterior-design-expert
148erichowens/some_claude_skills
Frontendtag: designtui-design
114hyperb1iss/hyperskills
Frontendtag: designgame-ui-design
65omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity
Frontendtag: designReviews
4.6★★★★★46 reviews- KKabir Choi★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for type-design-performance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- IIshan Lopez★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
type-design-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- AAanya Martin★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
type-design-performance reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- IIshan Ndlovu★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: type-design-performance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- FFatima Iyer★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in type-design-performance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- EEvelyn Farah★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
I recommend type-design-performance for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- AAdvait Kapoor★★★★★Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in type-design-performance — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- SSakura Ramirez★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
type-design-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- IIshan Flores★★★★★Oct 2, 2024
I recommend type-design-performance for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- YYuki Li★★★★★Sep 13, 2024
type-design-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 46
1 / 5Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.