dependency-injection-patterns▌
aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Use this skill when:
Dependency Injection Patterns
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
- Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
- Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
- Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection
Reference Files
- advanced-patterns.md: Testing with DI extensions, Akka.NET actor scope management, conditional/factory/keyed registration patterns
The Problem
Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:
// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
// ... 150 more lines ...
Problems: hard to find related registrations, no clear boundaries, can't reuse in tests, merge conflicts.
The Solution: Extension Method Composition
Group related registrations into extension methods:
// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddEmailServices()
.AddPaymentServices()
.AddValidators();
var app = builder.Build();
Extension Method Pattern
Basic Structure
namespace MyApp.Users;
public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IUserReadStore, UserReadStore>();
services.AddScoped<IUserWriteStore, UserWriteStore>();
services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
services.AddScoped<IUserValidationService, UserValidationService>();
return services;
}
}
With Configuration
namespace MyApp.Email;
public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
{
services.AddOptions<EmailOptions>()
.BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
.ValidateDataAnnotations()
.ValidateOnStart();
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
services.AddScoped<IUserEmailComposer, UserEmailComposer>();
services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
return services;
}
}
File Organization
Place extension methods near the services they register:
src/
MyApp.Api/
Program.cs # Composes all Add* methods
MyApp.Users/
Services/
UserService.cs
UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddUserServices()
MyApp.Orders/
OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddOrderServices()
MyApp.Email/
EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddEmailServices()
Convention: {Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs next to the feature's services.
Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Use For |
|---|---|
Add{Feature}Services() |
General feature registration |
Add{Feature}() |
Short form when unambiguous |
Configure{Feature}() |
When primarily setting options |
Use{Feature}() |
Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder) |
Testing Benefits
The Add* pattern lets you reuse production configuration in tests and only override what's different. Works with WebApplicationFactory, Akka.Hosting.TestKit, and standalone ServiceCollection.
See advanced-patterns.md for complete testing examples.
Layered Extensions
For larger applications, compose extensions hierarchically:
public static class AppServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddAppServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddDomainServices()
.AddInfrastructureServices()
.AddApiServices();
}
}
public static class DomainServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddDomainServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddProductServices();
}
}
Akka.Hosting Integration
The same pattern works for Akka.NET actor configuration:
public static class OrderActorExtensions
{
public static AkkaConfigurationBuilder AddOrderActors(
this AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder)
{
return builder
.WithActors((system, registry, resolver) =>
{
var orderProps = resolver.Props<OrderActor>();
var orderRef = system.ActorOf(orderProps, "orders");
registry.Register<OrderActor>(orderRef);
});
}<How to use dependency-injection-patterns on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add dependency-injection-patterns
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches dependency-injection-patterns from GitHub repository aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate dependency-injection-patterns. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /dependency-injection-patterns) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Carlos Bhatia· Dec 28, 2024
dependency-injection-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 20, 2024
dependency-injection-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Carlos Khan· Dec 20, 2024
We added dependency-injection-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Kwame Singh· Dec 12, 2024
dependency-injection-patterns is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Noah Abebe· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend dependency-injection-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend dependency-injection-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ama Anderson· Nov 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: dependency-injection-patterns is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Carlos Torres· Oct 22, 2024
dependency-injection-patterns has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Li Perez· Oct 10, 2024
Useful defaults in dependency-injection-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 2, 2024
Useful defaults in dependency-injection-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 32