Optimizes application performance by identifying and fixing bottlenecks based on profiling data.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionperformance-optimizationExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches performance-optimization from OWNER/REPO and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate performance-optimization. Access via /performance-optimization in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use skill to generate boilerplate code, refactor legacy code, and write tests faster
Example
Generate React component with TypeScript types, styled-components, and comprehensive test suite in minutes
Reduce development time by 40-60% for repetitive coding tasks
Systematically review code for bugs, security issues, and style violations
Example
Analyze pull requests for common anti-patterns, suggest performance improvements, flag security vulnerabilities
Catch 70%+ of code issues before human review, improve code quality
Trace errors through stack traces and identify root causes faster
Example
Analyze error logs, suggest probable causes, recommend fixes with code examples
0
total installs
0
this week
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
—
stars
| name | performance-optimization |
| description | Optimizes application performance. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, or when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement. Use when profiling reveals bottlenecks that need fixing. |
Measure before optimizing. Performance work without measurement is guessing — and guessing leads to premature optimization that adds complexity without improving what matters. Profile first, identify the actual bottleneck, fix it, measure again. Optimize only what measurements prove matters.
When NOT to use: Don't optimize before you have evidence of a problem. Premature optimization adds complexity that costs more than the performance it gains.
| Metric | Good | Needs Improvement | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) | ≤ 2.5s | ≤ 4.0s | > 4.0s |
| INP (Interaction to Next Paint) | ≤ 200ms | ≤ 500ms | > 500ms |
| CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) | ≤ 0.1 | ≤ 0.25 | > 0.25 |
1. MEASURE → Establish baseline with real data
2. IDENTIFY → Find the actual bottleneck (not assumed)
3. FIX → Address the specific bottleneck
4. VERIFY → Measure again, confirm improvement
5. GUARD → Add monitoring or tests to prevent regression
Two complementary approaches — use both:
Frontend:
# Synthetic: Lighthouse in Chrome DevTools (or CI)
# Chrome DevTools → Performance tab → Record
# Chrome DevTools MCP → Performance trace
# RUM: Web Vitals library in code
import { onLCP, onINP, onCLS } from 'web-vitals';
onLCP(console.log);
onINP(console.log);
onCLS(console.log);
Backend:
# Response time logging
# Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
# Database query logging with timing
# Simple timing
console.time('db-query');
const result = await db.query(...);
console.timeEnd('db-query');
Use the symptom to decide what to measure first:
What is slow?
├── First page load
│ ├── Large bundle? --> Measure bundle size, check code splitting
│ ├── Slow server response? --> Measure TTFB in DevTools Network waterfall
│ │ ├── DNS long? --> Add dns-prefetch / preconnect for known origins
│ │ ├── TCP/TLS long? --> Enable HTTP/2, check edge deployment, keep-alive
│ │ └── Waiting (server) long? --> Profile backend, check queries and caching
│ └── Render-blocking resources? --> Check network waterfall for CSS/JS blocking
├── Interaction feels sluggish
│ ├── UI freezes on click? --> Profile main thread, look for long tasks (>50ms)
│ ├── Form input lag? --> Check re-renders, controlled component overhead
│ └── Animation jank? --> Check layout thrashing, forced reflows
├── Page after navigation
│ ├── Data loading? --> Measure API response times, check for waterfalls
│ └── Client rendering? --> Profile component render time, check for N+1 fetches
└── Backend / API
├── Single endpoint slow? --> Profile database queries, check indexes
├── All endpoints slow? --> Check connection pool, memory, CPU
└── Intermittent slowness? --> Check for lock contention, GC pauses, external deps
Common bottlenecks by category:
Frontend:
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Investigation |
|---|---|---|
| Slow LCP | Large images, render-blocking resources, slow server | Check network waterfall, image sizes |
| High CLS | Images without dimensions, late-loading content, font shifts | Check layout shift attribution |
| Poor INP | Heavy JavaScript on main thread, large DOM updates | Check long tasks in Performance trace |
| Slow initial load | Large bundle, many network requests | Check bundle size, code splitting |
Backend:
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Investigation |
|---|---|---|
| Slow API responses | N+1 queries, missing indexes, unoptimized queries | Check database query log |
| Memory growth | Leaked references, unbounded caches, large payloads | Heap snapshot analysis |
| CPU spikes | Synchronous heavy computation, regex backtracking | CPU profiling |
| High latency | Missing caching, redundant computation, network hops | Trace requests through the stack |
// BAD: N+1 — one query per task for the owner
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany();
for (const task of tasks) {
task.owner = await db.users.findUnique({ where: { id: task.ownerId } });
}
// GOOD: Single query with join/include
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany({
include: { owner: true },
});
// BAD: Fetching all records
const allTasks = await db.tasks.findMany();
// GOOD: Paginated with limits
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany({
take: 20,
skip: (page - 1) * 20,
orderBy: { createdAt: 'desc' },
});
<!-- BAD: No dimensions, no format optimization -->
<img src="/hero.jpg" />
<!-- GOOD: Hero / LCP image — art direction + resolution switching, high priority -->
<!--
Two techniques combined:
- Art direction (media): different crop/composition per breakpoint
- Resolution switching (srcset + sizes): right file size per screen density
-->
<picture>
<!-- Mobile: portrait crop (8:10) -->
<source
media="(max-width: 767px)"
srcset="/hero-mobile-400.avif 400w, /hero-mobile-800.avif 800w"
sizes="100vw"
width="800"
height="1000"
type="image/avif"
/>
<source
media="(max-width: 767px)"
srcset="/hero-mobile-400.webp 400w, /hero-mobile-800.webp 800w"
sizes="100vw"
width="800"
height="1000"
type="image/webp"
/>
<!-- Desktop: landscape crop (2:1) -->
<source
srcset="/hero-800.avif 800w, /hero-1200.avif 1200w, /hero-1600.avif 1600w"
sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px"
width="1200"
height="600"
type="image/avif"
/>
<source
srcset="/hero-800.webp 800w, /hero-1200.webp 1200w, /hero-1600.webp 1600w"
sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px"
width="1200"
height="600"
type="image/webp"
/>
<img
src="/hero-desktop.jpg"
width="1200"
height="600"
fetchpriority="high"
alt="Hero image description"
/>
</picture>
<!-- GOOD: Below-the-fold image — lazy loaded + async decoding -->
<img
src="/content.webp"
width="800"
height="400"
loading="lazy"
decoding="async"
alt="Content image description"
/>
// BAD: Creates new object on every render, causing children to re-render
function TaskList() {
return <TaskFilters options={{ sortBy: 'date', order: 'desc' }} />;
}
// GOOD: Stable reference
const DEFAULT_OPTIONS = { sortBy: 'date', order: 'desc' } as const;
function TaskList() {
return <TaskFilters options={DEFAULT_OPTIONS} />;
}
// Use React.memo for expensive components
const TaskItem = React.memo(function TaskItem({ task }: Props) {
return <div>{/* expensive render */}</div>;
});
// Use useMemo for expensive computations
function TaskStats({ tasks }: Props) {
const stats = useMemo(() => calculateStats(tasks), [tasks]);
return <div>{stats.completed} / {stats.total}</div>;
}
// Modern bundlers (Vite, webpack 5+) handle named imports with tree-shaking automatically,
// provided the dependency ships ESM and is marked `sideEffects: false` in package.json.
// Profile before changing import styles — the real gains come from splitting and lazy loading.
// GOOD: Dynamic import for heavy, rarely-used features
const ChartLibrary = lazy(() => import('./ChartLibrary'));
// GOOD: Route-level code splitting wrapped in Suspense
const SettingsPage = lazy(() => import('./pages/Settings'));
function App() {
return (
<Suspense fallback={<Spinner />}>
<SettingsPage />
</Suspense>
);
}
// Cache frequently-read, rarely-changed data
const CACHE_TTL = 5 * 60 * 1000; // 5 minutes
let cachedConfig: AppConfig | null = null;
let cacheExpiry = 0;
async function getAppConfig(): Promise<AppConfig> {
if (cachedConfig && Date.now() < cacheExpiry) {
return cachedConfig;
}
cachedConfig = await db.config.findFirst();
cacheExpiry = Date.now() + CACHE_TTL;
return cachedConfig;
}
// HTTP caching headers for static assets
app.use('/static', express.static('public', {
maxAge: '1y', // Cache for 1 year
immutable: true, // Never revalidate (use content hashing in filenames)
}));
// Cache-Control for API responses
res.set('Cache-Control', 'public, max-age=300'); // 5 minutes
Set budgets and enforce them:
JavaScript bundle: < 200KB gzipped (initial load)
CSS: < 50KB gzipped
Images: < 200KB per image (above the fold)
Fonts: < 100KB total
API response time: < 200ms (p95)
Time to Interactive: < 3.5s on 4G
Lighthouse Performance score: ≥ 90
Enforce in CI:
# Bundle size check
npx bundlesize --config bundlesize.config.json
# Lighthouse CI
npx lhci autorun
For detailed performance checklists, optimization commands, and anti-pattern reference, see references/performance-checklist.md.
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We'll optimize later" | Performance debt compounds. Fix obvious anti-patterns now, defer micro-optimizations. |
| "It's fast on my machine" | Your machine isn't the user's. Profile on representative hardware and networks. |
| "This optimization is obvious" | If you didn't measure, you don't know. Profile first. |
| "Users won't notice 100ms" | Research shows 100ms delays impact conversion rates. Users notice more than you think. |
| "The framework handles performance" | Frameworks prevent some issues but can't fix N+1 queries or oversized bundles. |
React.memo and useMemo everywhere (overusing is as bad as underusing)After any performance-related change:
Cut debugging time by 30-50%, especially for unfamiliar codebases
Get explanations, examples, and best practices for unfamiliar frameworks
Example
Understand Next.js app router, learn Rust ownership, grasp Kubernetes concepts with practical examples
Accelerate learning curve by 2-3x, reduce onboarding time for new tech stacks
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-30 minutes to install and see first useful output
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use coding skills for boilerplate generation, code reviews, refactoring legacy code, writing tests, learning new frameworks, and debugging non-critical issues. Best for repetitive tasks where errors are easy to catch.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for production security features (auth, encryption, payment processing), complex business logic requiring deep domain knowledge, performance-critical algorithms, or when learning fundamentals is more valuable than speed.
wshobson/agents
OWNER/REPO
supercent-io/skills-template
flutter/skills
pproenca/dot-skills
wshobson/agents
Registry listing for performance-optimization matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: performance-optimization is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
performance-optimization fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
performance-optimization is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
performance-optimization reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Keeps context tight: performance-optimization is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for performance-optimization matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
performance-optimization reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Registry listing for performance-optimization matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
performance-optimization is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 36