### Sprint Status
Works with
description: "Fast sprint status check. Reads the current sprint plan, scans story files for status, and produces a concise progress snapshot with burndown assessment and emerging risks. Run at any ti
argument-hint: "[sprint-number or blank for current]"
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionsprint-statusExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches sprint-status from Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate sprint-status. Access via /sprint-status in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
10.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
10.7K
stars
| name | sprint-status |
| description | "Fast sprint status check. Reads the current sprint plan, scans story files for status, and produces a concise progress snapshot with burndown assessment and emerging risks. Run at any time during a sprint for quick situational awareness. Use when user asks 'how is the sprint going', 'sprint update', 'show sprint progress'." |
| argument-hint | "[sprint-number or blank for current]" |
| user-invocable | true |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep |
| model | haiku |
This is a fast situational awareness check, not a sprint review. It reads the
current sprint plan and story files, scans for status markers, and produces a
concise snapshot in under 30 lines. For detailed sprint management, use
/sprint-plan update or /milestone-review.
This skill is read-only. It never proposes changes, never asks to write files, and makes at most one concrete recommendation.
Argument: $ARGUMENTS[0] (blank = use current sprint)
/sprint-status 3), search
production/sprints/ for a file matching sprint-03.md, sprint-3.md,
or similar. Report which file was found.production/sprints/ and treat it as the current sprint.production/sprints/ does not exist or is empty, report: "No sprint
files found. Start a sprint with /sprint-plan new." Then stop.Read the sprint file in full. Extract:
Using today's date and the sprint end date from the sprint file, calculate:
If the sprint file does not include explicit dates, note "Sprint dates not found — burndown assessment skipped."
First: check for production/sprint-status.yaml.
If it exists, read it directly — it is the authoritative source of truth.
Extract status for each story from the status field. No markdown scanning needed.
Use its sprint, goal, start, end fields instead of re-parsing the sprint plan.
If sprint-status.yaml does not exist (legacy sprint or first-time setup),
fall back to markdown scanning:
When using the fallback, add a note at the bottom of the output:
"⚠ No sprint-status.yaml found — status inferred from markdown. Run /sprint-plan update to generate one."
Optionally (fast check only — do not do a deep scan): grep src/ for a
directory or file name that matches the story's system slug to check for
implementation evidence. This is a hint only, not a definitive status.
After collecting status for all stories, check each IN PROGRESS story for staleness:
Last Updated: field in the frontmatter or header (e.g., Last Updated: 2026-04-01
or updated: 2026-04-01). Accept any reasonable date field name: Last Updated,
Updated, last-updated, updated_at.STALE stories are included in the output table and collected into an "Attention Needed" section (see Phase 5 output format).
Stale story escalation: If any IN PROGRESS story is flagged STALE, the burndown verdict is upgraded to at least At Risk — even if the completion percentage is within the normal On Track window. Record this escalation reason: "At Risk — [N] story(ies) with no progress in [N] days."
Calculate:
Assess burndown by comparing completion percentage to time consumed percentage:
If dates are unavailable, skip the burndown assessment and report "On Track / At Risk / Behind: unknown — sprint dates not found."
Keep the total output to 30 lines or fewer. Use this format:
## Sprint [N] Status — [Today's Date]
**Sprint Goal**: [from sprint plan]
**Days Remaining**: [N] of [total] ([% time consumed])
### Progress: [complete/total] tasks ([%])
| Story / Task | Priority | Status | Owner | Blocker |
|----------------------|------------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| [title] | Must Have | DONE | [owner] | |
| [title] | Must Have | IN PROGRESS | [owner] | |
| [title] | Must Have | BLOCKED | [owner] | [brief reason] |
| [title] | Should Have| NOT STARTED | [owner] | |
### Attention Needed
| Story / Task | Status | Last Updated | Days Stale | Note |
|----------------------|-------------|----------------|------------|----------------|
| [title] | IN PROGRESS | [date or N/A] | [N days] | [STALE / no timestamp — cannot check staleness / inline task — cannot check staleness] |
*(Omit this section entirely if no IN PROGRESS stories are stale or have timestamp concerns.)*
### Burndown: [On Track / At Risk / Behind]
[1-2 sentences. If behind: which Must Haves are at risk. If on track: confirm
and note any Should Haves the team could pull.]
### Must-Haves at Risk
[List any Must Have stories that are BLOCKED or NOT STARTED with less than
40% of sprint time remaining. If none, write "None."]
### Emerging Risks
[Any risks visible from the story scan: missing files, cascading blockers,
stories with no owner. If none, write "None identified."]
### Recommendation
[One concrete action, or "Sprint is on track — no action needed."]
Apply these rules before outputting, and place the flag at the TOP of the output if triggered (above the status table):
Critical flag — if Must Have stories are BLOCKED or NOT STARTED and less than 40% of the sprint time remains:
SPRINT AT RISK: [N] Must Have stories are not complete with [X]% of sprint
time remaining. Recommend replanning with `/sprint-plan update`.
Completion flag — if all Must Have stories are DONE:
All Must Haves complete. Team can pull from Should Have backlog.
Missing stories flag — if any referenced story files do not exist:
NOTE: [N] story files referenced in the sprint plan are missing.
Run `/story-readiness sprint` to validate story file coverage.
This skill is read-only. It reports observed facts from files on disk.
/sprint-plan update)For more detail on a specific story, the user can read the story file directly
or run /story-readiness [path].
For sprint replanning, use /sprint-plan update.
For end-of-sprint retrospective, use /milestone-review.
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
JuliusBrussee/caveman
JuliusBrussee/caveman
whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing
JuliusBrussee/caveman
whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing
vercel-labs/skills
We added sprint-status from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
sprint-status reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Keeps context tight: sprint-status is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
sprint-status has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
sprint-status fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sprint-status is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend sprint-status for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Useful defaults in sprint-status — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added sprint-status from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
sprint-status has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 38