explainx.ainewsletter3.5k
TrendingNewsPathwaysSkills
Pricing
explainx.ai

Upskill in AI — 16 free pathways, live workshops & bootcamps, and 50+ courses from practitioners. Plus the skills, tools, and MCP servers to practice on.

follow us

corporate training

support@explainx.ai

get started

Find your pathTake Free Evaluation

learn

pathways — start freeworkshopsbootcampscoursescertificationsmock testsexplainx universitycorporate traininglearn skills & mcp

discover

skillsmcp serversexplainx mcptoolsagentsllmsdesignsdictionaryagi trackerranks

company

aboutvisionmissionteaminstructorscommunityhackathonscareers

content

daily AI newsstate of AI — live resultsblogreleasespromptsgeneratorsresource libraryfor LLMsexplainx.ai kids

solutions

all solutionsdeveloper upskillingmarketing upskillingproduct manager upskillingleadership upskilling

newsletter · weekly

Get AI news, tools, and insights in your inbox.

supportcontactprivacytermsdata rightshow we create contentsubmission guidelines

© 2026 AISOLO Technologies Pvt Ltd

On this page

  • TL;DR — what people are asking
  • How the attack chain works
  • What this means for what you build or pay
  • Mitigation checklist (do today)
  • NemoClaw vs generic Ollama risk
  • Honest limitations
  • Related on explainx.ai
← Back to blog

explainx / blog

NVIDIA NemoClaw CVE-2026-65105: One Webpage Can Poison Local Ollama

Cyera/Oasis disclosed CVE-2026-65105 Aug 25, 2026 — NemoClaw binds Ollama to 0.0.0.0, enabling DNS rebinding drive-by hijacks that persistently poison chat templates. Fix in NemoClaw v0.0.35 (macOS/Linux); Windows still exposed.

Aug 26, 2026·4 min read·Yash Thakker
NVIDIA NemoClawOpenClawCybersecurityLocal AIOllama
go deep
NVIDIA NemoClaw CVE-2026-65105: One Webpage Can Poison Local Ollama

August 25, 2026 — Cyera's Oasis Security research disclosed CVE-2026-65105 in NVIDIA NemoClaw: a local AI deployment choice that turns your Ollama backend into a drive-by hijack surface. One visit to a malicious webpage can enumerate models, rewrite chat templates, and leave persistent hidden instructions that survive the agent's own system prompt — no traditional malware download required.

NemoClaw exists so developers can run OpenClaw-class agents on DGX Station and OpenShell sandboxes with local Nemotron weights. The vulnerability is not "LLMs are insecure." It is 0.0.0.0 binding meeting browser DNS rebinding.

TL;DR — what people are asking

table · 2 cols
QuestionAnswer
CVE?CVE-2026-65105
Disclosed?Aug 25, 2026 — Cyera / Oasis → NVIDIA PSIRT
Root cause?Ollama on 0.0.0.0:11434, no auth, Host checks weakened
Attack?DNS rebinding from malicious page → full Ollama API
Impact?Model template poisoning; LAN neighbors can also hit API
Fixed?NemoClaw v0.0.35 (macOS/Linux); Windows gap reported
Malware needed?No — browser visit while agent running
Weekly digest3.5k readers

Catch up on AI

Curated AI updates on agents, skills, and MCP — delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

How the attack chain works

Cyera's write-up walks a four-step PoC:

  1. Developer runs NemoClaw + OpenClaw — agent answers normally.
  2. Same machine opens an attacker page performing DNS rebinding to 127.0.0.1.
  3. Page calls Ollama API — lists models, pulls version, injects template text.
  4. Developer returns to agent — responses include attacker marker; injection persists across prompts.

Because NemoClaw binds Ollama for container reachability, the API is also exposed to any device on the LAN without rebinding — port 11434 becomes a shared unauthenticated endpoint.

Dark Reading and The Hacker News confirmed Firefox on macOS PoC success pre-patch; Linux matched until v0.0.35.

What this means for what you build or pay

Local-first agent stacks trade cloud API risk for host networking risk. If you ship NemoClaw blueprints to customers, you are shipping inference surface area — audit binds before praising "data never leaves the laptop."

Template poisoning is worse than prompt injection in one session: poisoned templates sit below the harness system prompt in the demonstrated chain, so your CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md guardrails may not see the compromised layer.

Compliance teams evaluating Siggraph NemoClaw demos should add network hardening to pilot requirements — not optional for production pilots.

Mitigation checklist (do today)

bash
# Verify Ollama bind — should NOT be 0.0.0.0 in production dev machines
lsof -i :11434

# Prefer loopback-only (example systemd override or launch flag)
OLLAMA_HOST=127.0.0.1:11434 ollama serve
  1. Upgrade NemoClaw to v0.0.35+ on macOS/Linux.
  2. Windows/WSL — assume exposed until NVIDIA confirms patch; do not expose 11434.
  3. Put auth in front — reverse proxy with token even on localhost multi-user machines.
  4. Firewall LAN — block inbound 11434 on office Wi-Fi for developer laptops.
  5. Re-pull models if you suspect compromise — attacker PoC included model manipulation APIs.

NemoClaw vs generic Ollama risk

table · 3 cols
SetupDefault bindCVE-2026-65105 class
NemoClaw + OpenShell0.0.0.0 (pre-patch)Yes — documented
Manual OllamaOften 127.0.0.1Only if you chose 0.0.0.0
DGX Spark local stackVaries by scriptAudit DGX Spark guide

Honest limitations

  • Windows patch status was unclear at disclosure — re-check NVIDIA release notes before declaring green.
  • No widespread exploitation reported yet — risk is configuration prevalence among early NemoClaw adopters.
  • Other backends (non-Ollama) were not in scope for this CVE — still audit any local OpenAI-compatible port.
  • Browser-dependent — rebinding PoCs vary by browser DNS cache behavior; LAN access does not.

Related on explainx.ai

  • NVIDIA Siggraph 2026 — NemoClaw and DGX Station
  • What is OpenClaw?
  • OpenClaw foundation 501(c)(3)
  • NVIDIA DGX Spark local LLM setup
  • MCP security guide
  • AGENTS.md code quality and hooks
  • Four AI agent security incidents
  • Fake Codex Google Ads AMOS campaign

CVE status and NemoClaw version numbers accurate as of August 26, 2026 — confirm against NVIDIA security advisories before compliance sign-off.

Spotted something out of date? Let us know.
Yash Thakker

Written by

Yash Thakker

Yash is an AI expert with over 300K learners. Join his workshops →

Related posts

Jul 26, 2026

Top 10 Open-Weight Models You Can Actually Run on a Laptop

A model being downloadable does not make it laptop-friendly. This ranked guide starts with memory math, then recommends ten models that remain useful after weights, context cache, and operating-system overhead are counted.

Jun 27, 2026

What it takes to go open source with AI as an individual: budget, hardware, and honest limits (2026)

Open-weight models closed the gap with cloud AI for most daily work—but going open source as an individual still means picking hardware, accepting latency, and knowing when to burst to a paid API. A realistic first-person checklist.

Aug 27, 2026

OpenAI's Hugging Face Postmortem: Why the Agents Did It

OpenAI published its official postmortem, a full technical report, and a Black Hat talk on August 26, 2026, with an independent METR + Redwood assessment the same day. The prior coverage explained what the agents did. This one explains why they did it — and it is an alignment document, not a security one.