arXiv▌
arXiv is a curated research-sharing platform open to anyone.
Export includes YAML frontmatter on the MDX option plus attribution so copies credit explainx.ai and this page URL.
about
arXiv is a curated research-sharing platform open to anyone. As a pioneer in digital open access, arXiv.org now hosts more than two million scholarly articles in eight subject areas, curated by our strong community of volunteer moderators. arXiv offers researchers a broad range of services: article submission, compilation, production, retrieval, search and discovery, web distribution for human readers, and API access for machines, together with content curation and preservation. Our emphasis on openness, collaboration, and scholarship provide the strong foundation on which arXiv thrives. arXiv currently serves the fields of physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. arXiv was founded by Paul Ginsparg in 1991 and is now maintained and operated by Cornell Tech. Operations are maintained by the arXiv Leadership Team and arXiv staff at Cornell University. Governance of arXiv is led by the Leadership Team with guidance from the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council, Institutions Advisory Council, and Science Advisory Council. arXiv is a community-supported resource funded by Cornell University, the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and donors. Registered users may submit articles to be announced by arXiv. There are no fees or costs for article submission. Submissions to arXiv are subject to a moderation process that classifies material as topical to the subject area and checks for scholarly value. Material is not peer-reviewed by arXiv - the contents of arXiv submissions are wholly the responsibility of the submitter and are presented “as is” without any warranty or guarantee. By hosting works and other materials on this site, arXiv, Cornell University, and their agents do not in any way convey implied approval of the assumptions, methods, results, or conclusions of the work.
features & capabilities
- /Agent4Rec, a user simulator in recommendation, leveraging LLM-empowered generative agents equipped with user profile, memory, and actions modules specifically tailored for the recommender system.
- /These agents' profile modules are initialized using real-world datasets (e.g. MovieLens, Steam, Amazon-Book), capturing users' unique tastes and social traits.
- /Memory modules log both factual and emotional memories and are integrated with an emotion-driven reflection mechanism.
- /Action modules support a wide variety of behaviors, spanning both taste-driven and emotion-driven actions.
industry focus
FAQ
- What is arXiv?
- arXiv is an AI agent profile on explainx.ai. The directory summarizes positioning, optional website links, and community ratings so buyers and developers can compare agents before visiting the vendor.
- How are arXiv reviews calculated?
- This page shows 56 ratings with an average of about 4.8 out of 5, combining illustrative sample rows with signed-in user reviews—always validate claims on the official product site.
- Where can I browse more agents?
- Use the explainx.ai agents index at /agents to filter by category, upvotes, and related listings.
List & Promote Your Agent
Add your AI agent to our curated directory
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Use Cases▌
Task Automation
Handle multi-step workflows autonomously
Example
Schedule meeting → Find time → Send invite → Confirm attendees
Save 5-10 hours/week on routine coordination tasks
Information Synthesis
Gather data from multiple sources and summarize
Example
Research competitor pricing across 5 websites, create comparison table
Reduce research time from hours to minutes
Decision Support
Analyze options and recommend actions
Example
Review 20 vendor proposals, score against criteria, rank top 3
Make data-driven decisions faster
Architecture▌
AI agents combine large language models with tools, memory, and decision-making logic to autonomously complete multi-step tasks without constant human guidance.
LLM Core
Large language model for reasoning and decision-making
Understand tasks, plan steps, generate responses
Tool Integration
APIs, databases, external services the agent can call
Take actions beyond text generation (search, compute, write files)
Memory System
Short-term (conversation) and long-term (persistent) memory
Maintain context across interactions and learn from past actions
Orchestration Logic
Decision engine for choosing next action
Plan multi-step workflows and handle errors/edge cases
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Clear task definition and success criteria
- ›APIs and tools agent will need to access
- ›Approval workflows for sensitive actions
- ›Monitoring and logging infrastructure
Installation Steps
- 1.Define agent scope and capabilities
- 2.Integrate necessary tools and APIs
- 3.Build orchestration logic for task planning
- 4.Test with low-risk tasks in sandbox
- 5.Monitor performance and iterate
- 6.Scale to production use cases
Key Considerations
- →Security: What actions can agent take without approval?
- →Reliability: What happens when agent fails mid-task?
- →Cost: LLM API calls can add up at scale
- →Monitoring: How to detect and fix agent mistakes?
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with narrow, well-defined tasks
- +Monitor agent actions and outcomes
- +Provide human oversight for critical decisions
- +Iterate based on real-world performance
- +Measure ROI: time saved, errors reduced, costs
✗ Don't
- −Don't deploy without testing edge cases
- −Don't give agent access to sensitive systems without safeguards
- −Don't ignore agent errors—investigate and fix root cause
- −Don't scale before proving value on pilot tasks
Performance & Optimization▌
Key Metrics
- Task completion rate: % of tasks agent completes successfully
- Time to completion: Agent vs. human baseline
- Error rate: % of tasks requiring human intervention
- Cost per task: LLM costs vs. human labor savings
Optimization Tips
- →Cache common workflows to reduce redundant LLM calls
- →Fine-tune decision logic based on failure patterns
- →Expand tool library to handle more use cases
- →Implement human-in-loop for high-stakes decisions
Ratings
4.8★★★★★56 reviews- ★★★★★Isabella Ramirez· Dec 28, 2024
arXiv reduced evaluation time — saves/upvotes on explainx.ai correlated with fewer surprises in the trial.
- ★★★★★Olivia Gill· Dec 16, 2024
arXiv is a strong agent listing on explainx.ai — the profile made it easy to compare capabilities before we signed up on the vendor site.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024
arXiv reduced evaluation time — saves/upvotes on explainx.ai correlated with fewer surprises in the trial.
- ★★★★★Olivia Ghosh· Dec 8, 2024
arXiv has been stable for production-ish demos; the explainx.ai page was a useful single link to share internally.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 27, 2024
We piloted arXiv for two weeks; the registry summary and category tag matched what the product actually emphasizes.
- ★★★★★Isabella Menon· Nov 27, 2024
We compared arXiv with three neighbors in the same category; this one had the most concrete “what it does” framing.
- ★★★★★Advait Chen· Nov 19, 2024
We piloted arXiv for two weeks; the registry summary and category tag matched what the product actually emphasizes.
- ★★★★★Kiara Garcia· Nov 7, 2024
Solid agent profile: arXiv links out cleanly and the on-site reviews add signal beyond marketing copy.
- ★★★★★Liam Sethi· Oct 26, 2024
arXiv reduced evaluation time — saves/upvotes on explainx.ai correlated with fewer surprises in the trial.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 18, 2024
arXiv is a strong agent listing on explainx.ai — the profile made it easy to compare capabilities before we signed up on the vendor site.
showing 1-10 of 56