gepetto

softaworks/agent-toolkit · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill gepetto
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Multi-step planning orchestration: research, stakeholder interviews, specification synthesis, implementation planning, and external LLM review.

  • Guides users through structured discovery: research topics, detailed interviews, and spec synthesis before writing implementation plans
  • Generates self-contained section files with dependencies, requirements, and acceptance criteria for autonomous or manual implementation
  • Integrates feedback from external LLM reviewers (Gemini, Codex) and supp
skill.md

Gepetto

Orchestrates a multi-step planning process: Research → Interview → Spec Synthesis → Plan → External Review → Sections

CRITICAL: First Actions

BEFORE anything else, do these in order:

1. Print Intro

Print intro banner immediately:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: AI-Assisted Implementation Planning
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Research → Interview → Spec Synthesis → Plan → External Review → Sections

Note: GEPETTO will write many .md files to the planning directory you pass it

2. Validate Spec File Input

Check if user provided @file at invocation AND it's a spec file (ends with .md).

If NO @file was provided OR the path doesn't end with .md, output this and STOP:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: Spec File Required
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

This skill requires a markdown spec file path (must end with .md).
The planning directory is inferred from the spec file's parent directory.

To start a NEW plan:
  1. Create a markdown spec file describing what you want to build
  2. It can be as detailed or as vague as you like
  3. Place it in a directory where gepetto can save planning files
  4. Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md

To RESUME an existing plan:
  1. Run: /gepetto @path/to/your-spec.md

Example: /gepetto @planning/my-feature-spec.md
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Do not continue. Wait for user to re-invoke with a .md file path.

3. Setup Planning Session

Determine session state by checking existing files:

  1. Set planning_dir = parent directory of the spec file

  2. Set initial_file = the spec file path

  3. Scan for existing planning files:

    • claude-research.md
    • claude-interview.md
    • claude-spec.md
    • claude-plan.md
    • claude-integration-notes.md
    • claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
    • claude-ralphy-prd.md
    • reviews/ directory
    • sections/ directory
  4. Determine mode and resume point:

Files Found Mode Resume From
None new Step 4
research only resume Step 6 (interview)
research + interview resume Step 8 (spec synthesis)
+ spec resume Step 9 (plan)
+ plan resume Step 10 (external review)
+ reviews resume Step 11 (integrate)
+ integration-notes resume Step 12 (user review)
+ sections/index.md resume Step 14 (write sections)
all sections complete resume Step 15 (execution files)
+ claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md + claude-ralphy-prd.md complete Done
  1. Create TODO list with TodoWrite based on current state

Print status:

Planning directory: {planning_dir}
Mode: {mode}

If resuming:

Resuming from step {N}
To start fresh, delete the planning directory files.

Logging Format

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
STEP {N}/17: {STEP_NAME}
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
{details}
Step {N} complete: {summary}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Workflow

4. Research Decision

See research-protocol.md.

  1. Read the spec file
  2. Extract potential research topics (technologies, patterns, integrations)
  3. Ask user about codebase research needs
  4. Ask user about web research needs (present derived topics as multi-select)
  5. Record which research types to perform in step 5

5. Execute Research

See research-protocol.md.

Based on decisions from step 4, launch research subagents:

  • Codebase research: Task(subagent_type=Explore)
  • Web research: Task(subagent_type=Explore) with WebSearch

If both are needed, launch both Task tools in parallel (single message with multiple tool calls).

Important: Subagents return their findings - they do NOT write files directly. After collecting results from all subagents, combine them and write to <planning_dir>/claude-research.md.

Skip this step entirely if user chose no research in step 4.

6. Detailed Interview

See interview-protocol.md

Run in main context (AskUserQuestion requires it). The interview should be informed by:

  • The initial spec
  • Research findings (if any)

7. Save Interview Transcript

Write Q&A to <planning_dir>/claude-interview.md

8. Write Initial Spec (Spec Synthesis)

Combine into <planning_dir>/claude-spec.md:

  • Initial input (the spec file)
  • Research findings (if step 5 was done)
  • Interview answers (from step 6)

This synthesizes the user's raw requirements into a complete specification.

9. Generate Implementation Plan

Create detailed plan → <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md

IMPORTANT: Write for an unfamiliar reader. The plan must be fully self-contained - an engineer or LLM with no prior context should understand what we're building, why, and how just from reading this document.

10. External Review

See external-review.md

Launch TWO subagents in parallel to review the plan:

  1. Gemini via Bash
  2. Codex via Bash

Both receive the plan content and return their analysis. Write results to <planning_dir>/reviews/.

11. Integrate External Feedback

Analyze the suggestions in <planning_dir>/reviews/.

You are the authority on what to integrate or not. It's OK if you decide to not integrate anything.

Step 1: Write <planning_dir>/claude-integration-notes.md documenting:

  • What suggestions you're integrating and why
  • What suggestions you're NOT integrating and why

Step 2: Update <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md with the integrated changes.

12. User Review of Integrated Plan

Use AskUserQuestion:

The plan has been updated with external feedback. You can now review and edit claude-plan.md.

If you want Claude's help editing the plan, open a separate Claude session - this session
is mid-workflow and can't assist with edits until the workflow completes.

When you're done reviewing, select "Done" to continue.

Options: "Done reviewing"

Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.

13. Create Section Index

See section-index.md

Read claude-plan.md. Identify natural section boundaries and create <planning_dir>/sections/index.md.

CRITICAL: index.md MUST start with a SECTION_MANIFEST block. See the reference for format requirements.

Write index.md before proceeding to section file creation.

14. Write Section Files — Parallel Subagents

See section-splitting.md

Launch parallel subagents - one Task per section for maximum efficiency:

  1. First, parse sections/index.md to get the SECTION_MANIFEST list
  2. Then launch ALL section Tasks in a single message (parallel execution):
# Launch all in ONE message for parallel execution:

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="""
  Write section file: section-01-{name}

  Inputs:
  - <planning_dir>/claude-plan.md
  - <planning_dir>/sections/index.md

  Output: <planning_dir>/sections/section-01-{name}.md

  The section file must be COMPLETELY SELF-CONTAINED. Include:
  - Background (why this section exists)
  - Requirements (what must be true when complete)
  - Dependencies (requires/blocks)
  - Implementation details (from the plan)
  - Acceptance criteria (checkboxes)
  - Files to create/modify

  The implementer should NOT need to reference any other document.
  """
)

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="Write section file: section-02-{name} ..."
)

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="Write section file: section-03-{name} ..."
)

# ... one Task per section in the manifest

Wait for ALL subagents to complete before proceeding.

15. Generate Execution Files — Subagent

Delegate to subagent to reduce main context token usage:

Task(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  prompt="""
  Generate two execution files for autonomous implementation.

  Input files:
  - <planning_dir>/sections/index.md (has SECTION_MANIFEST)
  - <planning_dir>/sections/section-*.md (all section files)

  OUTPUT 1: <planning_dir>/claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
  For ralph-loop plugin. EMBED all section content inline.

  Structure:
  - Mission statement
  - Full content of sections/index.md
  - Full content of EACH section file (embedded, not referenced)
  - Execution rules (dependency order, verify acceptance criteria)
  - Completion signal: <promise>ALL-SECTIONS-COMPLETE</promise>

  OUTPUT 2: <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md
  For Ralphy CLI. REFERENCE section files (don't embed).

  Structure:
  - PRD header
  - How to use (ralphy --prd command)
  - Context explanation
  - Checkbox task list: one "- [ ] Section NN: {name}" per section

  Write both files.
  """
)

Wait for subagent completion before proceeding.

16. Final Status

Verify all files were created successfully:

  • All section files from SECTION_MANIFEST
  • claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md
  • claude-ralphy-prd.md

17. Output Summary

Print generated files and next steps:

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
GEPETTO: Planning Complete
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Generated files:
  - claude-research.md (research findings)
  - claude-interview.md (Q&A transcript)
  - claude-spec.md (synthesized specification)
  - claude-plan.md (implementation plan)
  - claude-integration-notes.md (feedback decisions)
  - reviews/ (external LLM feedback)
  - sections/ (implementation units)
  - claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md (for ralph-loop plugin)
  - claude-ralphy-prd.md (for Ralphy CLI)

How to implement:

Option A - Manual (recommended for learning/control):
  1. Read sections/index.md to understand dependencies
  2. Implement each section file in order
  3. Each section is self-contained with acceptance criteria

Option B - Autonomous with ralph-loop (Claude Code plugin):
  /ralph-loop @<planning_dir>/claude-ralph-loop-prompt.md --completion-promise "COMPLETE" --max-iterations 100

Option C - Autonomous with Ralphy (external CLI):
  ralphy --prd <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md
  # Or: cp <planning_dir>/claude-ralphy-prd.md ./PRD.md && ralphy
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
how to use gepetto

How to use gepetto on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add gepetto
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill gepetto

The skills CLI fetches gepetto from GitHub repository softaworks/agent-toolkit and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/gepetto

Reload or restart Cursor to activate gepetto. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /gepetto) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.563 reviews
  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024

    We added gepetto from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Kwame Farah· Dec 8, 2024

    gepetto fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Kwame Zhang· Dec 8, 2024

    gepetto reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Zaid Tandon· Dec 8, 2024

    We added gepetto from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Kwame Chawla· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in gepetto — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Liam Liu· Nov 27, 2024

    gepetto is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Diya Diallo· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for gepetto matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Nikhil Ndlovu· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in gepetto — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Nikhil Abebe· Nov 27, 2024

    We added gepetto from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 3, 2024

    Useful defaults in gepetto — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 63

1 / 7