hotfix

Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · updated Apr 16, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill hotfix
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

### Hotfix

  • description: "Emergency fix workflow that bypasses normal sprint processes with a full audit trail. Creates hotfix branch, tracks approvals, and ensures the fix is backported correctly."
  • argument-hint: "[bug-id or description]"
  • allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, Task
skill.md
name
hotfix
description
"Emergency fix workflow that bypasses normal sprint processes with a full audit trail. Creates hotfix branch, tracks approvals, and ensures the fix is backported correctly."
argument-hint
"[bug-id or description]"
user-invocable
true
allowed-tools
Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, Task

Explicit invocation only: This skill should only run when the user explicitly requests it with /hotfix. Do not auto-invoke based on context matching.

Phase 1: Assess Severity

Read the bug description or ID. Determine severity:

  • S1 (Critical): Game unplayable, data loss, security vulnerability — hotfix immediately
  • S2 (Major): Significant feature broken, workaround exists — hotfix within 24 hours
  • If severity is S3 or lower, recommend using the normal bug fix workflow instead and stop.

Phase 2: Create Hotfix Record

Draft the hotfix record:

## Hotfix: [Short Description]
Date: [Date]
Severity: [S1/S2]
Reporter: [Who found it]
Status: IN PROGRESS

### Problem
[Clear description of what is broken and the player impact]

### Root Cause
[To be filled during investigation]

### Fix
[To be filled during implementation]

### Testing
[What was tested and how]

### Approvals
- [ ] Fix reviewed by lead-programmer
- [ ] Regression test passed (qa-tester)
- [ ] Release approved (producer)

### Rollback Plan
[How to revert if the fix causes new issues]

Ask: "May I write this to production/hotfixes/hotfix-[date]-[short-name].md?"

If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed.


Phase 3: Create Hotfix Branch

If git is initialized, create the hotfix branch:

git checkout -b hotfix/[short-name] [release-tag-or-main]

Phase 4: Investigate and Implement

Focus on the minimal change that resolves the issue. Do NOT refactor, clean up, or add features alongside the hotfix.

Validate the fix by running targeted tests for the affected system. Check for regressions in adjacent systems.

Update the hotfix record with root cause, fix details, and test results.


Phase 5: Collect Approvals

Use the Task tool to request sign-off in parallel:

  • subagent_type: lead-programmer — Review the fix for correctness and side effects
  • subagent_type: qa-tester — Run targeted regression tests on the affected system
  • subagent_type: producer — Approve deployment timing and communication plan

All three must return APPROVE before proceeding. If any returns CONCERNS or REJECT, do not deploy — surface the issue and resolve it first.


Phase 5b: QA Re-Entry Gate

After approvals, determine the QA scope required before deploying the hotfix. Spawn qa-lead via Task with:

  • The hotfix description and affected system
  • The regression test results from Phase 5
  • A list of all systems that touch the changed files (use Grep to find callers)

Ask qa-lead: Is a full smoke check sufficient, or does this fix require a targeted team-qa pass?

Apply the verdict:

  • Smoke check sufficient — run /smoke-check against the hotfix build. If PASS, proceed to Phase 6.
  • Targeted QA pass required — run /team-qa [affected-system] scoped to the changed system only. If QA returns APPROVED or APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS, proceed to Phase 6.
  • Full QA required — S1 fixes that touch core systems may require a full /team-qa sprint. This delays deployment but prevents a bad patch.

Do not skip this gate. A hotfix that breaks something else is worse than the original bug.


Phase 6: Update Bug Status and Deploy

Update the original bug file if one exists:

## Fix Record
**Fixed in**: hotfix/[branch-name] — [commit hash or description]
**Fixed date**: [date]
**Status**: Fixed — Pending Verification

Set **Status**: Fixed — Pending Verification in the bug file header.

Output a deployment summary:

## Hotfix Ready to Deploy: [short-name]

**Severity**: [S1/S2]
**Root cause**: [one line]
**Fix**: [one line]
**QA gate**: [Smoke check PASS / Team-QA APPROVED]
**Approvals**: lead-programmer ✓ / qa-tester ✓ / producer ✓
**Rollback plan**: [from Phase 2 record]

Merge to: release branch AND development branch
Next: /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] after deploy to confirm resolution

Rules

  • Hotfixes must be the MINIMUM change to fix the issue — no cleanup, no refactoring
  • Every hotfix must have a rollback plan documented before deployment
  • Hotfix branches merge to BOTH the release branch AND the development branch
  • All hotfixes require a post-incident review within 48 hours
  • If the fix is complex enough to need more than 4 hours, escalate to technical-director

Phase 7: Post-Deploy Verification

After deploying, run /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] to confirm the fix resolved the issue in the deployed build.

If VERIFIED FIXED: run /bug-report close [BUG-ID] to formally close it. If STILL PRESENT: the hotfix failed — immediately re-open, assess rollback, and escalate.

Schedule a post-incident review within 48 hours using /retrospective hotfix.

how to use hotfix

How to use hotfix on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add hotfix
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill hotfix

The skills CLI fetches hotfix from GitHub repository Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/hotfix

Reload or restart Cursor to activate hotfix. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /hotfix) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.553 reviews
  • Charlotte Smith· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: hotfix is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Anika Kapoor· Dec 20, 2024

    hotfix has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024

    I recommend hotfix for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Kwame Ghosh· Nov 15, 2024

    hotfix has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Olivia Haddad· Nov 11, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: hotfix is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Noor Bhatia· Oct 6, 2024

    Useful defaults in hotfix — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Noah Rao· Oct 2, 2024

    We added hotfix from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Hana Jain· Sep 17, 2024

    hotfix reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Jin Mensah· Sep 13, 2024

    Registry listing for hotfix matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Tariq Martinez· Sep 13, 2024

    hotfix has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 53

1 / 6