but

Use GitButler CLI (but) as the default version-control interface.

gitbutlerapp/gitbutlerUpdated Apr 8, 2026

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

0

total installs

0

this week

20.0K

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills add https://github.com/gitbutlerapp/gitbutler --skill but

0

installs

0

this week

20.0K

stars

Installation Guide

How to use but on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add but
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/gitbutlerapp/gitbutler --skill but

Fetches but from gitbutlerapp/gitbutler and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/but

Restart Cursor to activate but. Access via /but in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

GitButler CLI Skill

Use GitButler CLI (but) as the default version-control interface.

Non-Negotiable Rules

  1. Use but for all write operations. Never run git add, git commit, git push, git checkout, git merge, git rebase, git stash, or git cherry-pick. If the user says a git write command, translate it to but and run that.
  2. Always add --status-after to mutation commands.
  3. Use CLI IDs from but status -fv / but diff / but show; never hardcode IDs.
  4. Start with but status -fv before mutations so IDs and stack state are current.
  5. Create a branch for new work with but branch new <name> when needed.

Core Flow

Every write task should follow this sequence.

# 1. Inspect state and gather IDs
but status -fv

# 2. If new branch needed:
but branch new <name>

# 3. Edit files (Edit/Write tools)

# 4. Refresh IDs if needed
but status -fv

# 5. Perform mutation with IDs from status/diff/show
but <mutation> ... --status-after

Command Patterns

  • Commit: but commit <branch> -m "<msg>" --changes <id>,<id> --status-after
  • Commit + create branch: but commit <branch> -c -m "<msg>" --changes <id> --status-after
  • Amend: but amend <file-id> <commit-id> --status-after
  • Reorder commits: but move <source-commit-id> <target-commit-id> --status-after (commit IDs, not branch names)
  • Stack branches: but move <branch-name-or-id> <target-branch-name-or-id> --status-after (branch names or branch CLI IDs)
  • Tear off a branch: but move <branch-name-or-id> zz --status-after (zz = unassigned; branch name or branch CLI ID)
  • Equivalent branch subcommand syntax remains available: but branch move <branch-name> <target-branch-name> and but branch move --unstack <branch-name>
  • Push: but push or but push <branch-id>
  • Pull: but pull --check then but pull --status-after

Task Recipes

Commit files

  1. but status -fv
  2. Find the CLI ID for each file you want to commit.
  3. but commit <branch> -m "<msg>" --changes <id1>,<id2> --status-after Use -c to create the branch if it doesn't exist. Omit IDs you don't want committed.
  4. Check the --status-after output for remaining uncommitted changes. If the file still appears as unassigned or assigned to another branch after commit, it may be dependency-locked. See "Stacked dependency / commit-lock recovery" below.

Amend into existing commit

  1. but status -fv (or but show <branch-id>)
  2. Locate file ID and target commit ID.
  3. but amend <file-id> <commit-id> --status-after

Reorder commits

but move supports both commit reordering and branch stack operations. Use commit IDs when reordering commits.

  1. but status -fv
  2. but move <commit-a> <commit-b> --status-after — uses commit IDs like c3, c5
  3. Refresh IDs from the returned status, then run the inverse: but move <commit-b> <commit-a> --status-after

Stack existing branches

To make one existing branch depend on (stack on top of) another, use top-level move:

but move feature/frontend feature/backend

This moves the frontend branch on top of the backend branch in one step.

Equivalent subcommand syntax:

but branch move feature/frontend feature/backend

DO NOT use uncommit + branch delete + branch new -a to stack existing branches. That approach fails because git branch names persist even after but branch delete. Always use but move <branch> <target-branch> (or the equivalent but branch move ...).

To unstack (make a stacked branch independent again):

but move feature/logging zz

Equivalent subcommand syntax:

but branch move --unstack feature/logging

Note: branch stack/tear-off operations use branch names (like feature/frontend) or branch CLI IDs, while commit reordering uses commit IDs (like c3). Do NOT use but undo to unstack — it may revert more than intended and lose commits.

Stacked dependency / commit-lock recovery

A dependency lock occurs when a file was originally committed on branch A, but you're trying to commit changes to it on branch B. Symptoms:

  • but commit succeeds but the file still appears in unassignedChanges in the --status-after output
  • The file shows as "unassigned" instead of being staged to any branch

Recovery: Stack your branch on the dependency branch, then commit:

  1. but status -fv — identify which branch originally owns the file (check commit history).
  2. but move <your-branch-name> <dependency-branch-name> — stack your branch on the dependency. Uses full branch names, not CLI IDs.
  3. but status -fv — the file should now be assignable. Commit it.
  4. but commit <branch> -m "<msg>" --changes <id> --status-after

If but move <branch> <target-branch> fails: Do NOT try uncommit, squash, or undo to work around it — these will leave the workspace in a worse state. Instead, re-run but status -fv to confirm both branches still exist and are applied, then retry with exact branch names from the status output.

Resolve conflicts after reorder/move

NEVER use git add, git commit, git checkout --theirs, git checkout --ours, or any git write commands during resolution. Only use but resolve commands and edit files directly with the Edit tool.

If but move causes conflicts (conflicted commits in status):

  1. but status -fv — find commits marked as conflicted.
  2. but resolve <commit-id> — enter resolution mode. This puts conflict markers in the files.
  3. Read the conflicted files to see the <<<<<<< / ======= / >>>>>>> markers.
  4. Edit the files to resolve conflicts by choosing the correct content and removing markers.
  5. but resolve finish — finalize. Do NOT run this without editing the files first.
  6. Repeat for any remaining conflicted commits.

Common mistakes: Do NOT use but amend on conflicted commits (it won't work). Do NOT skip step 4 — you must actually edit the files to remove conflict markers before finishing.

Git-to-But Map

git but
git status but status -fv
git add + git commit but commit ... --changes ...
git checkout -b but branch new <name>
git push but push
git rebase -i but move, but squash, but reword
git rebase --onto but branch move <branch> <new-base>
git cherry-pick but pick

Notes

  • Prefer explicit IDs over file paths for mutations.
  • --changes accepts comma-separated values (--changes a1,b2) or repeated flags (--changes a1 --changes b2), not space-separated.
  • Read-only git inspection (git log, git blame, git show --stat) is allowed.
  • After a successful --status-after, don't run a redundant but status -fv unless you need new IDs.
  • Use but show <branch-id> to see commit details for a branch, including per-commit file changes and line counts.
  • Per-commit file counts: but status does NOT include per-commit file counts. Use but show <branch-id> or git show --stat <commit-hash> to get them.
  • Avoid --help probes; use this skill and references/reference.md first. Only use --help after a failed attempt.
  • Run but skill check only when command behavior diverges from this skill, not as routine preflight.
  • For command syntax and flags: references/reference.md
  • For workspace model: references/concepts.md
  • For workflow examples: references/examples.md

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Steps

  1. 1Install product management skill
  2. 2Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.875 reviews
  • N
    Naina MalhotraDec 20, 2024

    but is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • J
    Jin AgarwalDec 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in but — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • C
    Charlotte ThomasDec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: but is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • S
    Sakura JohnsonDec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for but matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • C
    Chaitanya PatilDec 8, 2024

    Registry listing for but matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • K
    Kwame HuangDec 8, 2024

    but fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • P
    Piyush GNov 27, 2024

    but reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • N
    Naina ReddyNov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in but — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • N
    Naina SethiNov 7, 2024

    but has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • N
    Nia YangNov 3, 2024

    but reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 75

1 / 8

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.